Padre Pio is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The EWTN source never says "allegdly". The source says the following:
World War I continued and in July 1918, Pope Benedict XV, who had termed the World War "the suicide of Europe," appealed to all Christians urging them to pray for an end to the World War. On 27 July of the same year, Padre Pio offered himself as a victim for the end of the war. Days passed and between 5 and 7 August, Padre Pio had a vision in which Christ appeared and pierced his side. [1] [2]
But Mr. Bobby put the following:
Allegedly at 5 and 7 August, Padre Pio had a vision in which Christ appeared and pierced his side. [1] [2] Rafaelosornio ( talk) 00:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Bias may make in-text attribution appropriate. This is clearly a case where we cannot just embrace the gullible position of Catholic sources. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 07:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
References
User:Horse Eye's Back you removed Ruffin's book as a source because it was not reliable. However Ruffin has used many quotes Padre Pio's letters, so can we at least use the book as a source for Padre Pio's letters? SanctumRosarium ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Some content in this article should be removed because it is either too long or not notable. Padre Pio was not a politician and was never involved in politics so it doesn't make sense to have so much content on his alleged political views. Instead it would be better to add more content on his spirituality as he was a priest and was considered a saint by the Church. Also his views about how women should dress and on television are not notable and should be removed. It is not relevant to include the opinions Padre Pio may have had on every aspect of human life. Instead the article should focus on religion because he was a religious figure. SanctumRosarium ( talk) 22:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The article is getting more and more credulous by uncritically accepting Pio's alleged feats of bilocation, celestial visions, demonic attacks etc. All this content is sourced to a single pro Pio biography written by a die-hard believer. A bishop Raffaele Rossi is being quoted citing Pio's stigmata as genuine as a "real fact".
I have raised this issue at WP:FTN [1]. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 18:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Padre Pio is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The EWTN source never says "allegdly". The source says the following:
World War I continued and in July 1918, Pope Benedict XV, who had termed the World War "the suicide of Europe," appealed to all Christians urging them to pray for an end to the World War. On 27 July of the same year, Padre Pio offered himself as a victim for the end of the war. Days passed and between 5 and 7 August, Padre Pio had a vision in which Christ appeared and pierced his side. [1] [2]
But Mr. Bobby put the following:
Allegedly at 5 and 7 August, Padre Pio had a vision in which Christ appeared and pierced his side. [1] [2] Rafaelosornio ( talk) 00:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Bias may make in-text attribution appropriate. This is clearly a case where we cannot just embrace the gullible position of Catholic sources. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 07:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
References
User:Horse Eye's Back you removed Ruffin's book as a source because it was not reliable. However Ruffin has used many quotes Padre Pio's letters, so can we at least use the book as a source for Padre Pio's letters? SanctumRosarium ( talk) 21:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Some content in this article should be removed because it is either too long or not notable. Padre Pio was not a politician and was never involved in politics so it doesn't make sense to have so much content on his alleged political views. Instead it would be better to add more content on his spirituality as he was a priest and was considered a saint by the Church. Also his views about how women should dress and on television are not notable and should be removed. It is not relevant to include the opinions Padre Pio may have had on every aspect of human life. Instead the article should focus on religion because he was a religious figure. SanctumRosarium ( talk) 22:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
The article is getting more and more credulous by uncritically accepting Pio's alleged feats of bilocation, celestial visions, demonic attacks etc. All this content is sourced to a single pro Pio biography written by a die-hard believer. A bishop Raffaele Rossi is being quoted citing Pio's stigmata as genuine as a "real fact".
I have raised this issue at WP:FTN [1]. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 18:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)