This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Mindfulness Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Mindfulness Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
The section, "Elevation_of_positive_emotions_and_outcomes", misrepresents the work of Shao (2009). Current text reads, "He found that a stronger positive association for women than for men."
However, the Shao's article says, "Our findings show that mindfulness was not associated with performance either as a bivariate correlation or when controlling for other predictors. We found, however, that mindfulness and gender interacted to predict performance. Specifically, mindfulness was positively related to performance for women but not men."
Source: Shao, R.P. & Skarlicki, D.P. 2009 "The role of mindfulness in predicting individual performance" Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, volume 41, number 4, page 198.
45 women participated in this study.
I suggest we change the text to, "He found mindfulness was positively related to performance for women."
Martinangel ( talk) 18:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This piece,
Although Buddhist meditation techniques originated as spiritual practices, they have a long history of secular applications. For instance, the Tang Dynasty Chan (Japanese Zen) and Huayan scholar-monk Zongmi (780-841) listed "Five Types of Meditation", the first of which is for fanfu (Japanese bompu) 凡夫 "ordinary people". Philip Kapleau explains:
Bompu Zen, being free from any philosophic or religious content, is for anybody and everybody. It is a Zen practiced purely in the belief that it can improve both physical and mental health. Since it can almost certainly have no ill effects, anyone can undertake it, whatever religious beliefs they happen to hold or if they hold none at all. Bompu Zen is bound to eliminate sickness of a psychosomatic nature and to improve the health generally. (1989:49)
is about the five types of Zen, not about mindfulness in psychology. I have removed this section from the page. A more appropriate place for this information would be (and is) Guifeng Zongmi or Buddhist meditation.
Also, after a recent edit, the first sentence of the blockquoted section above is now redundant. makeswell ( talk) 15:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Are there no critiques of the concept of mindfulness that could be included? Alnpete ( talk) 07:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I found the criticism quote by Wallace difficult to understand. The use of ellipses in the quotation takes what may be a coherent argument, and make it seem like that of an uneducated person. I suggest removing the quote, as it already has too much space for what is, namely a disputed, and not necessarily relevant (that is Mindfulness is as much what is taught now, as what was taught a few hundred years after Buddha died) opinion. Any objections, suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.18.92 ( talk) 08:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
there looks to be an overlap with psychological mindedness-- Penbat ( talk) 18:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Says on page 770: "Our meta-analysis only included mindfulness meditation protocols, limiting the scope of the results to this particular practice." TimidGuy ( talk) 11:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Says on page 764: "Studies were excluded if they (1) did not include a mindfulness meditation based intervention." And "The meta-analysis excluded studies that examined mindfulness as part of another treatment, such as cognitive behavior protocol, because it was dif!cult to dissociate the effect of mindfulness fromother components." TimidGuy ( talk) 11:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
TimidGuy you keep inserting that this study is specific to meditation. Whatever the paper means by the stuff you've quoted, it does not mean it was confined to meditation studies only. Look at Appendix B, or read the DARE summary: "In the included studies, a variety of mindfulness therapies were used, including mindfulness-based awareness processes, stress reduction, cognitive therapy, relapse prevention and yoga." Alexbrn talk| contribs| COI 14:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the interwikis and have transferred them to my workpage (they are also in the page history of this page). They will be installed on Wikidata as soon as possible. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Same topic Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I've explained before. It's up to you to come up with WP:RS which make this distinction. Otherwise it's your personal understanding, which is WP:OR. Sorry; the insight may be correct, but Wikipedia is based on WP:RS, not on our personal insights. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Copying info from "Mindfulnees (psychology)" has extended "MM", but not generated substantial differences. So far, only TimidGuy seems to object to the proposed merger, so I'll go ahead and merge them. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Having gone through most pages related to mindfulness, and after creating a sidebar, it's clear that "mindfulness (meditation)" is covered by Mindfulness (psychology), Satipatthana and Anapanasati. Its also clear that "mindfulness meditation" is a synonym for "mindfulness (psychology)". The argument that "mindfulness (meditation)" is different from "mindfulness (state)" is still not conclusively covered by WP:RS, and even it were, should result in a separate page on "mindfulness (state)", not on a fourth page on mindfulness-practice. Therefor, I've changed "Mindfulness (meditation)" into a disambiguation-page, and reworked Mindfulness into an overview-page, with links to both the Buddhist and the psychological use. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Joshua Jonathan. There is no need for a separate "mindfulness meditation" article. VictoriaGrayson ( talk) 19:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
There is a tag on Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) linking to this discussion. The tag suggests Mindfulness-based stress reduction be merged with Mindfulness (psychology), but I don't see any discussion of that specific merge since the date of the tag, which is June 2014. I would disagree that the MBSR article be merged with the general mindfulness article, since MBSR is a particular program with wide notoriety. MBSR is a customized adaption of the principles of mindfulness. Mrtea (talk) 01:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Template removed. Thank you everyone for your comments. I've removed the merge template from MBSR per the consensus here, and it looks like it was placed there erroneously anyway. -- Mrtea (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Here's what I've proposed before:
The current Mindfulness article would become "Mindfulness (Buddhism)", the current "Mindfulness (psychology)" and "Mindfulness (positive psychology) articles would become "Mindfulness." The "Mindfulness meditation" article should comprise content that's now a bit haphazardly spread among other articles and should focus on the secular practice, including the burgeoning body of research and popular interest. All of these secular mindfulness therapies have separate bodies of research. TimidGuy ( talk) 10:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Alexbrn: Re your revert and my undo (diff). On my User Talk page you wrote: "Your treatment of the source is undue and gives weight to dubious aspects of it." Could you please explain what you mean by that? For your ready reference:
Here's the text that you had, and to which you reverted:
A 2013 meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies concluded that they are useful in treating a variety of psychological problems – for example in helping to reduce anxiety, depression, and stress – and that mindfulness was a "central component" of the therapies' effectiveness. [1] Given the low quality of the underlying data, it is however possible that this conclusion was overstated. [2]
and here's my edit:
A 2013 meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies (MBT), involving 209 studies and 12,145 participants, showed that MBT is moderately effective in pre-post studies, superior to some treatments ( psychoeducation, supportive therapy, relaxation, imagery, and art-therapy), but not more effective than traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. [1] The analysis indicated that MBT was more effective in treating psychological disorders than it was in treating physical or medical conditions. MBT showed "large and clinically significant effects in treating anxiety and depression", with gains maintained at follow-up. These findings were similar to those obtained in previous meta-analyses. [3] The authors acknowledged, however, the wide variation between the studies in their design, interventions, participants, outcomes, and quality; it it thus possible that their conclusions may be overstated. [4]
Clinical Psychology Review, which published the Khoury study, is a peer-reviewed Academic journal. The study was assessed by at least five reviewers. The limitations of the study were identified by the authors themselves, but I left your citation of the CRD review in the Article anyway.
Thanks; LeoRomero ( talk) 01:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |first3=
(
help)
{{
citation}}
: |entry=
ignored (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
citation}}
: |entry=
ignored (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
@ Alexbrn: So I don't waste your time responding to the above, I wanna tell you right now that I think I see what you're saying. Am reading that huge AHRQ study, and will edit my edits accordingly. - Thanks; LeoRomero ( talk) 06:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Alexbrn: Here's what I did (diff), I'd appreciate your feedback. - Thanks again; LeoRomero ( talk) 08:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
"Random Scribble Outside Context" is almost equivalent to "Wikipedia" (d*rn!). More concretely:
Etc.. Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 07:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
I've been thinking further over TimidGuy's point of mindfulness as a "state", which may also arise spontaneously. It reminds me of the first jhana, which the Buddha is said to have experienced spontaneously when he was a youth. According to the Nikaya's, Gautama remembered this when he'd decided to quit his ascetic practices. The memory lead him to another approach, culminating in his awakening (according to the Nikaya's). Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 09:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Three sources have been given so far for mindfulness as as state:
"The simplest definition of meditation is learning to do one thing at a time. Building the capacity to quiet the mind has undeniable value at a time when our attention is under siege, and distraction has become our steady state. Meditation – in the right doses — is also valuable as a means to relax the body, quiet the emotions and refresh one’s energy. There is growing evidence that meditation has some health benefits. What I haven’t seen is much evidence that meditating leads people to behave better, improves their relationships or makes them happier.
Consider what Jack Kornfield has to say about meditation. In the 1970s, after spending a number of years as a monk in Southeast Asia, Mr. Kornfield was one of the first Americans to bring the practice of mindfulness to the West. He remains one of the best-known mindfulness teachers, while also practicing as a psychologist.“ While I benefited enormously from the training in the Thai and Burmese monasteries where I practiced,” he wrote, “I noticed two striking things. First, there were major areas of difficulty in my life, such as loneliness, intimate relationships, work, childhood wounds, and patterns of fear that even very deep meditation didn’t touch.
Second, among the several dozen Western monks (and lots of Asian meditators) I met during my time in Asia, with a few notable exceptions, most were not helped by meditation in big areas of their lives. Meditation and spiritual practice can easily be used to suppress and avoid feeling or to escape from difficult areas of our lives.»
There is a difference between mindfulness meditation and simple mindfulness. The latter isn’t a practice separate from everyday life. Mindfulness just means becoming more conscious of what you’re feeling, more intentional about your behaviors and more attentive to your impact on others. It’s about presence — what Ms. Ingram calls “keeping quiet and simple inside, rather than having any mental task whatsoever.
The real challenge isn’t what we’re able to do with our eyes closed. It’s to be more self-aware in the crucible of our everyday lives, and to behave better as a result. That’s mindfulness in action"
It's clear that three different meanings of "mindfulness" are being confused here: mindfulness in daily life, mindfulness practice in a "formal" setting, and Buddhist insight or Vipassana meditation. The issue at stake here is not mindfulness as a "state", but the growing popularisation of mindfulness outside a buddhist and clinical context (aptly called the "Mindfulness movement" [8]; see also Google and Mindfulness Isn't a Trend, It's a Movement). It's perfectly fine to write a section on "Popularisation of mindfulness" in the Mindfulness-article, but it does not warrant the creation of content-forks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |year=
(
help). Trait, state and practice.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk! 07:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)If there is to be a separate article on "daily mindfulness", "mindfulness as a state", "mindfulness as a function", etc.: under which name? With regards to WP:COMMONNAME, the term "mindfulness" is overwhelmingly being used for the western, secular mimdfulness-practice; so that's not the name to be used. What are the alternatives?
So, quite some choices. Mindfulness (state) might be an alternative, supported by Merriam-Webster; the alternative is to make mention of "mindfulness as a state" apart from practice, and to add some links at the Mindfulness (disambiguation) page, which I'll do rigth now.
Attempting to correcting add an edit on ADHD. Someone is deleting and I'm not sure why. Please let me know what I am doing wrong. Lifegaurdgirl ( talk) 00:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that has been
merged and now targets the page: • Mindfulness Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Mindfulness Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Duquesne University/UCOR 143 Global and Cultural Perspectives (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
The section, "Elevation_of_positive_emotions_and_outcomes", misrepresents the work of Shao (2009). Current text reads, "He found that a stronger positive association for women than for men."
However, the Shao's article says, "Our findings show that mindfulness was not associated with performance either as a bivariate correlation or when controlling for other predictors. We found, however, that mindfulness and gender interacted to predict performance. Specifically, mindfulness was positively related to performance for women but not men."
Source: Shao, R.P. & Skarlicki, D.P. 2009 "The role of mindfulness in predicting individual performance" Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, volume 41, number 4, page 198.
45 women participated in this study.
I suggest we change the text to, "He found mindfulness was positively related to performance for women."
Martinangel ( talk) 18:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
This piece,
Although Buddhist meditation techniques originated as spiritual practices, they have a long history of secular applications. For instance, the Tang Dynasty Chan (Japanese Zen) and Huayan scholar-monk Zongmi (780-841) listed "Five Types of Meditation", the first of which is for fanfu (Japanese bompu) 凡夫 "ordinary people". Philip Kapleau explains:
Bompu Zen, being free from any philosophic or religious content, is for anybody and everybody. It is a Zen practiced purely in the belief that it can improve both physical and mental health. Since it can almost certainly have no ill effects, anyone can undertake it, whatever religious beliefs they happen to hold or if they hold none at all. Bompu Zen is bound to eliminate sickness of a psychosomatic nature and to improve the health generally. (1989:49)
is about the five types of Zen, not about mindfulness in psychology. I have removed this section from the page. A more appropriate place for this information would be (and is) Guifeng Zongmi or Buddhist meditation.
Also, after a recent edit, the first sentence of the blockquoted section above is now redundant. makeswell ( talk) 15:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Are there no critiques of the concept of mindfulness that could be included? Alnpete ( talk) 07:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I found the criticism quote by Wallace difficult to understand. The use of ellipses in the quotation takes what may be a coherent argument, and make it seem like that of an uneducated person. I suggest removing the quote, as it already has too much space for what is, namely a disputed, and not necessarily relevant (that is Mindfulness is as much what is taught now, as what was taught a few hundred years after Buddha died) opinion. Any objections, suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.18.92 ( talk) 08:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
there looks to be an overlap with psychological mindedness-- Penbat ( talk) 18:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Says on page 770: "Our meta-analysis only included mindfulness meditation protocols, limiting the scope of the results to this particular practice." TimidGuy ( talk) 11:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Says on page 764: "Studies were excluded if they (1) did not include a mindfulness meditation based intervention." And "The meta-analysis excluded studies that examined mindfulness as part of another treatment, such as cognitive behavior protocol, because it was dif!cult to dissociate the effect of mindfulness fromother components." TimidGuy ( talk) 11:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
TimidGuy you keep inserting that this study is specific to meditation. Whatever the paper means by the stuff you've quoted, it does not mean it was confined to meditation studies only. Look at Appendix B, or read the DARE summary: "In the included studies, a variety of mindfulness therapies were used, including mindfulness-based awareness processes, stress reduction, cognitive therapy, relapse prevention and yoga." Alexbrn talk| contribs| COI 14:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
I have removed the interwikis and have transferred them to my workpage (they are also in the page history of this page). They will be installed on Wikidata as soon as possible. – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Same topic Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I've explained before. It's up to you to come up with WP:RS which make this distinction. Otherwise it's your personal understanding, which is WP:OR. Sorry; the insight may be correct, but Wikipedia is based on WP:RS, not on our personal insights. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Copying info from "Mindfulnees (psychology)" has extended "MM", but not generated substantial differences. So far, only TimidGuy seems to object to the proposed merger, so I'll go ahead and merge them. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Having gone through most pages related to mindfulness, and after creating a sidebar, it's clear that "mindfulness (meditation)" is covered by Mindfulness (psychology), Satipatthana and Anapanasati. Its also clear that "mindfulness meditation" is a synonym for "mindfulness (psychology)". The argument that "mindfulness (meditation)" is different from "mindfulness (state)" is still not conclusively covered by WP:RS, and even it were, should result in a separate page on "mindfulness (state)", not on a fourth page on mindfulness-practice. Therefor, I've changed "Mindfulness (meditation)" into a disambiguation-page, and reworked Mindfulness into an overview-page, with links to both the Buddhist and the psychological use. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Joshua Jonathan. There is no need for a separate "mindfulness meditation" article. VictoriaGrayson ( talk) 19:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
There is a tag on Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) linking to this discussion. The tag suggests Mindfulness-based stress reduction be merged with Mindfulness (psychology), but I don't see any discussion of that specific merge since the date of the tag, which is June 2014. I would disagree that the MBSR article be merged with the general mindfulness article, since MBSR is a particular program with wide notoriety. MBSR is a customized adaption of the principles of mindfulness. Mrtea (talk) 01:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Template removed. Thank you everyone for your comments. I've removed the merge template from MBSR per the consensus here, and it looks like it was placed there erroneously anyway. -- Mrtea (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Here's what I've proposed before:
The current Mindfulness article would become "Mindfulness (Buddhism)", the current "Mindfulness (psychology)" and "Mindfulness (positive psychology) articles would become "Mindfulness." The "Mindfulness meditation" article should comprise content that's now a bit haphazardly spread among other articles and should focus on the secular practice, including the burgeoning body of research and popular interest. All of these secular mindfulness therapies have separate bodies of research. TimidGuy ( talk) 10:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Alexbrn: Re your revert and my undo (diff). On my User Talk page you wrote: "Your treatment of the source is undue and gives weight to dubious aspects of it." Could you please explain what you mean by that? For your ready reference:
Here's the text that you had, and to which you reverted:
A 2013 meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies concluded that they are useful in treating a variety of psychological problems – for example in helping to reduce anxiety, depression, and stress – and that mindfulness was a "central component" of the therapies' effectiveness. [1] Given the low quality of the underlying data, it is however possible that this conclusion was overstated. [2]
and here's my edit:
A 2013 meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies (MBT), involving 209 studies and 12,145 participants, showed that MBT is moderately effective in pre-post studies, superior to some treatments ( psychoeducation, supportive therapy, relaxation, imagery, and art-therapy), but not more effective than traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. [1] The analysis indicated that MBT was more effective in treating psychological disorders than it was in treating physical or medical conditions. MBT showed "large and clinically significant effects in treating anxiety and depression", with gains maintained at follow-up. These findings were similar to those obtained in previous meta-analyses. [3] The authors acknowledged, however, the wide variation between the studies in their design, interventions, participants, outcomes, and quality; it it thus possible that their conclusions may be overstated. [4]
Clinical Psychology Review, which published the Khoury study, is a peer-reviewed Academic journal. The study was assessed by at least five reviewers. The limitations of the study were identified by the authors themselves, but I left your citation of the CRD review in the Article anyway.
Thanks; LeoRomero ( talk) 01:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |first3=
(
help)
{{
citation}}
: |entry=
ignored (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
citation}}
: |entry=
ignored (
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
@ Alexbrn: So I don't waste your time responding to the above, I wanna tell you right now that I think I see what you're saying. Am reading that huge AHRQ study, and will edit my edits accordingly. - Thanks; LeoRomero ( talk) 06:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Alexbrn: Here's what I did (diff), I'd appreciate your feedback. - Thanks again; LeoRomero ( talk) 08:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
"Random Scribble Outside Context" is almost equivalent to "Wikipedia" (d*rn!). More concretely:
Etc.. Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 07:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
I've been thinking further over TimidGuy's point of mindfulness as a "state", which may also arise spontaneously. It reminds me of the first jhana, which the Buddha is said to have experienced spontaneously when he was a youth. According to the Nikaya's, Gautama remembered this when he'd decided to quit his ascetic practices. The memory lead him to another approach, culminating in his awakening (according to the Nikaya's). Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 09:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Three sources have been given so far for mindfulness as as state:
"The simplest definition of meditation is learning to do one thing at a time. Building the capacity to quiet the mind has undeniable value at a time when our attention is under siege, and distraction has become our steady state. Meditation – in the right doses — is also valuable as a means to relax the body, quiet the emotions and refresh one’s energy. There is growing evidence that meditation has some health benefits. What I haven’t seen is much evidence that meditating leads people to behave better, improves their relationships or makes them happier.
Consider what Jack Kornfield has to say about meditation. In the 1970s, after spending a number of years as a monk in Southeast Asia, Mr. Kornfield was one of the first Americans to bring the practice of mindfulness to the West. He remains one of the best-known mindfulness teachers, while also practicing as a psychologist.“ While I benefited enormously from the training in the Thai and Burmese monasteries where I practiced,” he wrote, “I noticed two striking things. First, there were major areas of difficulty in my life, such as loneliness, intimate relationships, work, childhood wounds, and patterns of fear that even very deep meditation didn’t touch.
Second, among the several dozen Western monks (and lots of Asian meditators) I met during my time in Asia, with a few notable exceptions, most were not helped by meditation in big areas of their lives. Meditation and spiritual practice can easily be used to suppress and avoid feeling or to escape from difficult areas of our lives.»
There is a difference between mindfulness meditation and simple mindfulness. The latter isn’t a practice separate from everyday life. Mindfulness just means becoming more conscious of what you’re feeling, more intentional about your behaviors and more attentive to your impact on others. It’s about presence — what Ms. Ingram calls “keeping quiet and simple inside, rather than having any mental task whatsoever.
The real challenge isn’t what we’re able to do with our eyes closed. It’s to be more self-aware in the crucible of our everyday lives, and to behave better as a result. That’s mindfulness in action"
It's clear that three different meanings of "mindfulness" are being confused here: mindfulness in daily life, mindfulness practice in a "formal" setting, and Buddhist insight or Vipassana meditation. The issue at stake here is not mindfulness as a "state", but the growing popularisation of mindfulness outside a buddhist and clinical context (aptly called the "Mindfulness movement" [8]; see also Google and Mindfulness Isn't a Trend, It's a Movement). It's perfectly fine to write a section on "Popularisation of mindfulness" in the Mindfulness-article, but it does not warrant the creation of content-forks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
{{
citation}}
: Check date values in: |year=
(
help). Trait, state and practice.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk! 07:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)If there is to be a separate article on "daily mindfulness", "mindfulness as a state", "mindfulness as a function", etc.: under which name? With regards to WP:COMMONNAME, the term "mindfulness" is overwhelmingly being used for the western, secular mimdfulness-practice; so that's not the name to be used. What are the alternatives?
So, quite some choices. Mindfulness (state) might be an alternative, supported by Merriam-Webster; the alternative is to make mention of "mindfulness as a state" apart from practice, and to add some links at the Mindfulness (disambiguation) page, which I'll do rigth now.
Attempting to correcting add an edit on ADHD. Someone is deleting and I'm not sure why. Please let me know what I am doing wrong. Lifegaurdgirl ( talk) 00:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)