This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
As Azawad has now been deemed to fulfill the requirements to be included on the List of sovereign states, I thought it only right and proper to add it here and to make the relevant changes to the Mali entry. Any disagreements? 86.178.182.255 ( talk) 19:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the SNC fulfills the criteria for being a sovereign state, because it's based outside the country and thus doesn't have permanent control over any territory in the way that the NTC did which qualified it for entry here. Obviously that could change, but it seems a little unrealistic to list Homs as the de facto capital of opposition Syria when Bashar al-Asad was being paraded around it a week or so ago. At the moment, I'd say the TNC is basically a government-in-exile, which wouldn't qualify it for inclusion.
I'm not going to remove it for now because I'd welcome other people's views to see if I'm the only one who thinks this, but that's certainly the angle that I'd take. 86.178.182.255 ( talk) 19:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Palestine is not a sovereign state and many references indicate this. The entry should be deleted from this article, but until then the disputed/no source tags are appropriate. This is currently under discussion on the Dispute Resolution board. 99.237.236.218 ( talk) 15:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
I had a go at updating the Palestine section with regards to the UN permanent observer thing, but I wouldn't consider myself an expert in international relations so I'd be glad for someone to check it over. Frickeg ( talk) 12:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
To explain my edit of separating Libya into two political entities during this portion of the time line I would like to draw your attention to the american civil war where the CSA is considered a defacto state itself despite fighting for independence. I know that the rebels claimed to be the legitimate government during the civil wayr but much like the congo crises there were two governments vying for legitimacy with the national community. Therefore I have split each Libya apart because both sides controlled land and a fore filled the general description of statehood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuminister ( talk • contribs)
Now I;`ve been seeing some frantic editing removing and readding the Islamic State (Islamic State in the Lavant) to this list. Although I may disagree politically to their existance I would argue that they do meet the requirements of statehood. However I would like to discuss this topic before readding them to the list as it seems to be a touchy subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuminister ( talk • contribs)
As stated above I suggest we add this section to the article to cover those states that are formed in conflict but never gain complete control over their complete area. Ie states created in the russian civil war that lasted for a short time. LPR, DPR, ISIL, or any polity resulting from separatist movements like Tamil Eelam. I still need to come up with a more concrete discretion for these type of states so I would like some help doing that. Benuminister ( talk) 00:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Well, I can understand that many of users here couldn't recognize Crimea as a self-governing state for a several days, it can be. But in question of belonging to Russia or Ukraine English Wikipedia having some mismatches now. Firstly, according to "Russia" section of current page, Russia has 21 republics and 2 federal cities. At the same time, according to that page we can see that Russia has 22 republics (with image where Crimea is a part of RF), and according to that - has 3 federal cities (with image where Sevastopol and Crimea are parts of RF). Secondly, according to "Ukraine" section of current page, "Ukraine HAD one autonomous republic: Crimea". Usually that means that Ukraine lost that territory, but according to that page, we can read next: " is a de jure autonomous republic of Ukraine covering most of the Crimean Peninsula". So Ukraine lost it or not?
And finally, the most interesting thing: According to "Russia" and "Ukraine" sections of current page Crimea is STILL NOT the part of Russia, but ALREADY NOT the part of Ukraine. So, logically, it means that Republic of Crimea must be self-governing? No, as it turned out, because these edits were cancelled from the page.
Sorry for my not ideal English.
Mc9902 (
talk) 12:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Crimea was not independent for a few days. It was annexed by Russia (if that will stick, is yet to be decided). Legacypac ( talk) 21:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
What we do with other states is irrelevant, I am not sure any RS have called Crimea a sovereign state. As to the others, they should be removed too. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of sovereign states in the 2010s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
In order to prevent an edit war or some such nonsense, might as well explain why I've been making edits.
Basically, in most of the "sovereign states in x decade" articles, the official names of some sovereign states are incorrect. All I've been doing is correcting said names so they are consistent with the rest of wikipedia. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.92.239 ( talk) 00:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
As Azawad has now been deemed to fulfill the requirements to be included on the List of sovereign states, I thought it only right and proper to add it here and to make the relevant changes to the Mali entry. Any disagreements? 86.178.182.255 ( talk) 19:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure that the SNC fulfills the criteria for being a sovereign state, because it's based outside the country and thus doesn't have permanent control over any territory in the way that the NTC did which qualified it for entry here. Obviously that could change, but it seems a little unrealistic to list Homs as the de facto capital of opposition Syria when Bashar al-Asad was being paraded around it a week or so ago. At the moment, I'd say the TNC is basically a government-in-exile, which wouldn't qualify it for inclusion.
I'm not going to remove it for now because I'd welcome other people's views to see if I'm the only one who thinks this, but that's certainly the angle that I'd take. 86.178.182.255 ( talk) 19:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Palestine is not a sovereign state and many references indicate this. The entry should be deleted from this article, but until then the disputed/no source tags are appropriate. This is currently under discussion on the Dispute Resolution board. 99.237.236.218 ( talk) 15:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
I had a go at updating the Palestine section with regards to the UN permanent observer thing, but I wouldn't consider myself an expert in international relations so I'd be glad for someone to check it over. Frickeg ( talk) 12:22, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
To explain my edit of separating Libya into two political entities during this portion of the time line I would like to draw your attention to the american civil war where the CSA is considered a defacto state itself despite fighting for independence. I know that the rebels claimed to be the legitimate government during the civil wayr but much like the congo crises there were two governments vying for legitimacy with the national community. Therefore I have split each Libya apart because both sides controlled land and a fore filled the general description of statehood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuminister ( talk • contribs)
Now I;`ve been seeing some frantic editing removing and readding the Islamic State (Islamic State in the Lavant) to this list. Although I may disagree politically to their existance I would argue that they do meet the requirements of statehood. However I would like to discuss this topic before readding them to the list as it seems to be a touchy subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benuminister ( talk • contribs)
As stated above I suggest we add this section to the article to cover those states that are formed in conflict but never gain complete control over their complete area. Ie states created in the russian civil war that lasted for a short time. LPR, DPR, ISIL, or any polity resulting from separatist movements like Tamil Eelam. I still need to come up with a more concrete discretion for these type of states so I would like some help doing that. Benuminister ( talk) 00:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Well, I can understand that many of users here couldn't recognize Crimea as a self-governing state for a several days, it can be. But in question of belonging to Russia or Ukraine English Wikipedia having some mismatches now. Firstly, according to "Russia" section of current page, Russia has 21 republics and 2 federal cities. At the same time, according to that page we can see that Russia has 22 republics (with image where Crimea is a part of RF), and according to that - has 3 federal cities (with image where Sevastopol and Crimea are parts of RF). Secondly, according to "Ukraine" section of current page, "Ukraine HAD one autonomous republic: Crimea". Usually that means that Ukraine lost that territory, but according to that page, we can read next: " is a de jure autonomous republic of Ukraine covering most of the Crimean Peninsula". So Ukraine lost it or not?
And finally, the most interesting thing: According to "Russia" and "Ukraine" sections of current page Crimea is STILL NOT the part of Russia, but ALREADY NOT the part of Ukraine. So, logically, it means that Republic of Crimea must be self-governing? No, as it turned out, because these edits were cancelled from the page.
Sorry for my not ideal English.
Mc9902 (
talk) 12:03, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Crimea was not independent for a few days. It was annexed by Russia (if that will stick, is yet to be decided). Legacypac ( talk) 21:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
What we do with other states is irrelevant, I am not sure any RS have called Crimea a sovereign state. As to the others, they should be removed too. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of sovereign states in the 2010s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
In order to prevent an edit war or some such nonsense, might as well explain why I've been making edits.
Basically, in most of the "sovereign states in x decade" articles, the official names of some sovereign states are incorrect. All I've been doing is correcting said names so they are consistent with the rest of wikipedia. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.92.239 ( talk) 00:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)