Landing at Saidor has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 21, 2009 WikiProject A-class review Approved May 17, 2017 Good article nominee Listed
	Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on January 2, 2011, January 2, 2015, January 2, 2022, and January 2, 2023.
Current status: Good article

This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: South Pacific / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Additional information: /  This article has passed an A-Class review. Australia: Military history Mid‑importance Landing at Saidor is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Japan: Military history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:09, April 24, 2024 ( JST, Reiwa 6) ( Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles United States: Military history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

G'day, the ALLCAPS treatment of operational names in this article jars quite a bit. I don't think it is consistent with MOS:MILTERMS or the rendering of operational names in high quality article titles that are operational names, such as Operation Brevity and others in the FA showcase. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 03:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply

It was that way in the sources. It's not covered by MOS:MILTERMS, which does not mention codenames (but perhaps should), but I thinks comes under MOS:SMALLCAPS? Anyhow, I have de-capitalised the codenames. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 05:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC) reply