This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was he Iran's UN representative at the UN HQ in NY or at Geneva? Or was he accredited for both?-- Severino ( talk) 10:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Bazargan was not prime minister at presidency of Banisadr. He was prime minister of provisional government 31.59.94.95 ( talk) 06:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)AHN
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kazem Rajavi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
The article accessible via ProQuest 408057298 shows that it was published in 'Lifestyle' section of the newspaper as a 'Commentary'. As a result, it is an opinion piece that does not comply with WP:NEWSORG and WP:NOTOPINION (criteria 2) and should not be use for anything more than personal opinion of Colman McCarthy with in-text attribution. Pahlevun ( talk) 14:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
@ MA Javadi: This explanation is written per WP:RESPTAG. The fact that you insist on putting the word "renowned" in the first sentence, in a clear violation of WP:PUFFERY, speaks for itself. No matter how many sources use the word, it cannot be used in Wikipedia is such way. In fact, peacock terms are used for pushing a POV, which this article suffers from badly. There has been at least three instances of failed verification: [1] [2] [3]. The third failed verification reads exactly –I want to stress again, exactly– like the MEK propaganda outlets. Despite there is not even one mention of Iranian position, the article repeatedly uses quotes favorable towards MEK's position in addition to direct mentions of its own positions. Aside from the "renowned" defender of human rights (the kind that supported Saddam Hussein's regime), he has been also described as "the financial and technical wizard of the MEK" [4], which is totally absent from this article. That sounds like a POV article. Do not remove the POV tag per WP:WNTRMT, unless the problem is resolved. Pahlevun ( talk) 19:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Shortly after his appointment, he resigned his post in protest to the "repressive policies and terrorist activities of the ruling clerics in Iran"( copied from here or here) without a citation, this article will have a POV issue. Plus, this is Iranian position, in case you wanted to know [6]. This article fails to mention the political nature of his activities, and brands him a simply as a professor or "human rights defender". He was a "Mujahedin-e Khalq activist" (as mentioned by Robert Satloff in his book The Politics Of Change In The Middle East), "the head of the People's Mujahideen organization in Geneva" (in words of Anthony Cordesman), "the Mojahedin's leader" (Cohen's article already in the article) or "Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) leader" (what the U.S. Department of Defense says). The lead does not say anything about his position in the current regime, during the time hundreds of executions took place. Pahlevun ( talk) 14:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Does this article need an NPOV tag? Idealigic ( talk) 10:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was he Iran's UN representative at the UN HQ in NY or at Geneva? Or was he accredited for both?-- Severino ( talk) 10:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Bazargan was not prime minister at presidency of Banisadr. He was prime minister of provisional government 31.59.94.95 ( talk) 06:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)AHN
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kazem Rajavi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
The article accessible via ProQuest 408057298 shows that it was published in 'Lifestyle' section of the newspaper as a 'Commentary'. As a result, it is an opinion piece that does not comply with WP:NEWSORG and WP:NOTOPINION (criteria 2) and should not be use for anything more than personal opinion of Colman McCarthy with in-text attribution. Pahlevun ( talk) 14:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
@ MA Javadi: This explanation is written per WP:RESPTAG. The fact that you insist on putting the word "renowned" in the first sentence, in a clear violation of WP:PUFFERY, speaks for itself. No matter how many sources use the word, it cannot be used in Wikipedia is such way. In fact, peacock terms are used for pushing a POV, which this article suffers from badly. There has been at least three instances of failed verification: [1] [2] [3]. The third failed verification reads exactly –I want to stress again, exactly– like the MEK propaganda outlets. Despite there is not even one mention of Iranian position, the article repeatedly uses quotes favorable towards MEK's position in addition to direct mentions of its own positions. Aside from the "renowned" defender of human rights (the kind that supported Saddam Hussein's regime), he has been also described as "the financial and technical wizard of the MEK" [4], which is totally absent from this article. That sounds like a POV article. Do not remove the POV tag per WP:WNTRMT, unless the problem is resolved. Pahlevun ( talk) 19:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Shortly after his appointment, he resigned his post in protest to the "repressive policies and terrorist activities of the ruling clerics in Iran"( copied from here or here) without a citation, this article will have a POV issue. Plus, this is Iranian position, in case you wanted to know [6]. This article fails to mention the political nature of his activities, and brands him a simply as a professor or "human rights defender". He was a "Mujahedin-e Khalq activist" (as mentioned by Robert Satloff in his book The Politics Of Change In The Middle East), "the head of the People's Mujahideen organization in Geneva" (in words of Anthony Cordesman), "the Mojahedin's leader" (Cohen's article already in the article) or "Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) leader" (what the U.S. Department of Defense says). The lead does not say anything about his position in the current regime, during the time hundreds of executions took place. Pahlevun ( talk) 14:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Does this article need an NPOV tag? Idealigic ( talk) 10:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)