This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Medicine: Society / Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force. Women scientists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Smithzv31 ( talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

I will continue to add information, I am currently reading the tutorial. Also, If I'm writing a connector page to Eve Fogelman.

Need help getting an image up

Thanks,

Z — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithzv31 ( talk • contribs)

I see that there are two sections within the list of publications about the Kestenberg Movement Profile. I have two questions:

(1) Is there a reason why there are two? What is the difference between these lists?

(2) Also, this list is quite long for a Wikipedia article. Many Wikipedia articles are on very notable topics but do not list out all the publications on that topic as part of the article. I can imagine two ways of improving this: (a) Create a "Further reading" section with a "reasonable number of publications" per WP:FURTHER. Is there any chance that just the most essential texts could be picked out for inclusion in such a list? (b) Take this bibliography out of this article entirely and use it (it's an amazing list) as resources from which to build an article on the Kestenberg Movement Profile itself, which doesn't seem to exist in English Wikipedia yet. Doing either or both of these two suggestions would greatly improve how this section appears and serve the readers a little better.

What do others think? -- Lange.lea ( talk) 21:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Greetings,

I have edited and changed many things thanks to your guidance. Let me know what you think or if you see any room for improvement.

z — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithzv31 ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply

extensive duplication DGG ( talk ) 17:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Support - significant overlap by two articles created by the same WP:Single purpose account with a declared WP:Conflict of interest. OnionRing ( talk) 17:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• 'Don't merge - The Kestenberg Movement Profile would make the Judith Kestenberg page extremely bulky. Whoever is editing obviously doesn't know how to Wikipedia Sandbox. Overall the material is relevant and if you are looking at the reference list, they are academically represented. Thoughts? Also, can a movement be merged with a person? FIW 18:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[[User:FreeInformationWorld|FreeInformationWorld]— Preceding unsigned comment added by FreeInformationWorld ( talk • contribs)
  • Comment: User:FreeInformationWorld has been blocked as a WP:Sockpuppet of User:Smithzv31. OnionRing ( talk) 16:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC) reply

• Don't Merge - After reviewing possible additions, I think that we should down size the article on Judith Kestenberg's page and add more to the Kestenberg Movement Profile. Smithzv31 ( talk) 16:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• I recommend not merging the two articles. The Kestenberg Movement Profile is a system widely used by Dance/movement therapists and warrants its own page, similar to that of Laban Analysis and Action Profile. Scholarlymuse ( talk) 23:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• I would agree that the material has too much overlap. I think it would be best to edit the Judith Kestenberg section but retain to separate web pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scholarlymuse ( talk • contribs) 23:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Agreed that the material is currently too overlapping. This can be fixed through edits, it seems to me, and the two entries should remain distinct. Do not merge. The Kestenberg Movement Profile (KMP) pertains to a research methodology, a body of theoretical work, and a set of applicable ideas (e.g. applied clinically/psychologically, developmentally, anthropologically). Current research is being pursued, training in the method has internationally spread, theoretical aspects are actively being considered (interlaced with current domains in psychology, developmental science, movement studies/kinesics, psychoanalysis, nonverbal behavior, cultural studies, etc.). The KMP certainly deserves its own place in Wikipedia. This seems fundamentally different than the Judith Kestenberg page, which is equally needed. While Dr. Kestenberg was principal among the originators of the KMP, and her contributions were foundational in that realm, there were other original contributors, and the method continues to evolve. As an individual, Dr. Kestenberg's contributions (to the literature, as a teacher, trainer and scholar) extended well beyond the KMP method, theory and applications. She contributed invaluable work in the areas of psychological and psychodynamic developmental stage theory, parent-child interaction patterns, the relationship of child observation to adult psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, and the bridging of creative arts with psychiatry and psychology; Moreover, she was a keynote contributor to knowledge and thinking about the Holocaust, and to it's impact upon child survivors and on intergenerational effects, as upon children of survivors. By initiating and overseeing one of the largest collections of child-survivor interviews, and creating a psychologically anchored way of studying them, she laid ground for an even broader understanding of the effects of organized persecution upon youth. Hence, as an individual, Dr. Kestenberg's contributions as a pivotal thinker, theorist, and clinician in psychiatry, psychology, psychoanalysis, child-studies, parenting-studies, Holocaust-studies, and trauma-studies distinguish her separately from the Kestenberg Movement Profile. So, I recommend editing, not merging. [kmsossin] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmsossin ( talk • contribs) 23:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply
• Comment This is a discussion for active Wikipedia editors on the merits or disadvantages of a merge. Don't invite all your friends and co-workers to create an account and chime in here, because that's not what a merge proposal is for, and the new WP:Single-purpose account's comments will be taken with a large pinch of salt when deciding whether or not to merge. OnionRing ( talk) 16:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Closing, given no consensus for a merge over almost 2 years. There seems to a consensus that the current pages could be (heavily) pruned to remove duplication, but that both Judith Kestenberg and Kestenberg Movement Profile are independently notable. Klbrain ( talk) 16:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judith Kestenberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117062038/http://www.adl.org/hidden/what_we_do.asp to http://www.adl.org/hidden/what_we_do.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply