This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Breaking out merge discussion, which may continue as needed. Dekimasu よ! 20:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS → Hana o Pūn/Futari wa NS – Article title doesn't need a space between the slashes unless it's for technical restrictions. It's not only unnecessary but also grammatically incorrect. These are just two song titles that are paired together. lullabying ( talk) 00:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge article to Kira Pika and create another redirect without the spaces if you want, rendering the issue moot. Band article is tiny, this album article is even tinier, a single Wikipedia article can certainly cover both. SnowFire ( talk) 21:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Article has been updated with reception. I propose Keep for this article but Merge
Kira Pika to
Kirarin Revolution.
lullabying (
talk) 22:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose merging "Kira Pika". The group is notable per
WP:BAND.
And I'm opposed to merging this article (the one about the single) as well. The single chanted and
Lullabying even found a good source discussing the songs in detail. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 09:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
This is taken from WP:MERGEREASON and here are my suggestions about merging Kira Pika with Kirarin Revolution:
Aside from this a lot of the information from Kira Pika now overlaps with Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS, and Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS has now established notability independent outside of the show. Kira Pika can also be merged to Draft:Kirarin Revolution discography once I finish getting feedback from it. lullabying ( talk) 17:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
About your Third Opinion request: The request made at Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires recent thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance and the most recent discussion here is almost two months old. You might want to request a consensus evaluation at WP:AN. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 21:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Comment. Since Lullabying created the "
Kirarin Revolution discography", he or she has AfDed or
boldly redirected several articles there. I personally find all this annoying, if not
disruptive. The
MilkyWay article, for example, was easlily defendable if only he or she notified me.
I had to come here yet again because I saw him/her posting a
request for closure. First an
WP:3O (it was so long ago, it seems like a couple of years have passed!), then I can remember a post to
WP:AN (yes, about this very article!), now a
WP:ANRFC. Just
WP:DROPTHESTICK. Could you please, I'm begging you... I had other plans for today. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 13:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC) And for tomorrow. And for the coming year. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 13:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Breaking out merge discussion, which may continue as needed. Dekimasu よ! 20:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS → Hana o Pūn/Futari wa NS – Article title doesn't need a space between the slashes unless it's for technical restrictions. It's not only unnecessary but also grammatically incorrect. These are just two song titles that are paired together. lullabying ( talk) 00:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge article to Kira Pika and create another redirect without the spaces if you want, rendering the issue moot. Band article is tiny, this album article is even tinier, a single Wikipedia article can certainly cover both. SnowFire ( talk) 21:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Article has been updated with reception. I propose Keep for this article but Merge
Kira Pika to
Kirarin Revolution.
lullabying (
talk) 22:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose merging "Kira Pika". The group is notable per
WP:BAND.
And I'm opposed to merging this article (the one about the single) as well. The single chanted and
Lullabying even found a good source discussing the songs in detail. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 09:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
This is taken from WP:MERGEREASON and here are my suggestions about merging Kira Pika with Kirarin Revolution:
Aside from this a lot of the information from Kira Pika now overlaps with Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS, and Hana o Pūn / Futari wa NS has now established notability independent outside of the show. Kira Pika can also be merged to Draft:Kirarin Revolution discography once I finish getting feedback from it. lullabying ( talk) 17:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
About your Third Opinion request: The request made at Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires recent thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance and the most recent discussion here is almost two months old. You might want to request a consensus evaluation at WP:AN. — TransporterMan ( TALK) 21:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Comment. Since Lullabying created the "
Kirarin Revolution discography", he or she has AfDed or
boldly redirected several articles there. I personally find all this annoying, if not
disruptive. The
MilkyWay article, for example, was easlily defendable if only he or she notified me.
I had to come here yet again because I saw him/her posting a
request for closure. First an
WP:3O (it was so long ago, it seems like a couple of years have passed!), then I can remember a post to
WP:AN (yes, about this very article!), now a
WP:ANRFC. Just
WP:DROPTHESTICK. Could you please, I'm begging you... I had other plans for today. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 13:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC) And for tomorrow. And for the coming year. --
Moscow Connection (
talk) 13:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)