This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 18 November 2016 by reviewer Smmurphy ( talk · contribs). Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a good article. It could use some updated sources to make it more current. Kkrupp ( talk) 05:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

I wonder if the article would benefit from having more information added to the secure attachment style paragraph? Katelynn McClure ( talk) 04:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)Katelynn McClure reply

I noticed that there are a few grammatical mistakes throughout the article. The beginning sentence could benefit from an "a" before psychological model and under the infant attachment section the word exploration has an extra e at the beginning. I also wonder if the section under working model has enough sources? It seems like this section would benefit from a few more sources. KitKatD14 ( talk) 22:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply