This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles New York City This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3

haha... wow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.140.205 ( talk) 04:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Regarding this edit, [1] when it comes to biographical material about living persons, Wikipedia tends to be conservative. We don't post sensitive, personal or contentious material about a living person without strong sourcing. (See reliable sources for Wikipedia's guidelines about sourcing.) Even then, we have to weigh this information as compared to all the information regarding this person, and if we decide to include this information, we should do so in an encyclopedic manner. I'm sorry, but saying that sources exist, but you can't find any, so you're adding a 'citation needed' tag, is not sufficient. A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 01:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Amanda Peet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080706084912/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i7c5caf365ab6a9b896e30bce25086ad5 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i7c5caf365ab6a9b896e30bce25086ad5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. — ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC) reply

You should have an article for U Toronto physicist Amanda Peet, or at least mention her on a disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 ( talk) 20:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Is she notable? Can you prove that she's notable? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 20:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Chaheel Riens: You can see how frequently she is cited by searching "Amanda W. Peet" in Google Books or do the same search on Google Scholars to see the numerous peer-reviewed articles she's authored. Or you could check out the Nova presentation: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/view-peet.html. I don't know if that constitutes "proof" for Wikipurposes. Likely cutting edge theoretical physicists have a heavier burden than the countless garage bands, sitcom episodes and video games that have articles in Wikipedia. AnthroMimus ( talk) 05:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Peet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728164438/http://www.screeninglog.com/journal/2008/6/13/amanda-peet-boards-emmerichs-2012.html to http://www.screeninglog.com/journal/2008/6/13/amanda-peet-boards-emmerichs-2012.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815102634/http://www.reelzchannel.com/movie-news/3176/amanda-peet-joins-gullivers-travels-remake to http://www.reelzchannel.com/movie-news/3176/amanda-peet-joins-gullivers-travels-remake

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Why is Peet listed in the American Quakers category? I don't see any reference supporting that she's Quaker, only that her father is, and that she attended a Quaker school. - Amcbride ( talk) 23:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Removed. -- Amcbride ( talk) 21:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC) reply