This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Please add info about the AQI scale used by the EPA in the US.- 71.174.186.40 ( talk) 14:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
An additional section could describe how air pollution has changed since pre-industrial revolution, or how it has affected global warming. Also, it might be beneficial to further describe greenhouse gases. Overall, the structure is very organized and easy to follow. The 2014 World Health Organization report mentioned in the opening section could also work well in the health effects section! Amcgoo ( talk) 03:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Air pollution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
It was mentioned on the Today programme on 28 August 2018 can reduce intelligence - does any one think this could go in the article? Vorbee ( talk) 07:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Brian Everlasting, I don't know what you are playing at. But anyone trying to describe this graph as "fluctuating or changing" rather than "accelerating" is either a dyed-in-the-wool climate change denier (and thus has no business editing this article) or incompetent at interpreting graphs (and thus has no business editing this article). Stop it. Your contributions have been almost uniformly bad, and you seem determined to keep up the record. The next block is not going to be far away with this behaviour. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 10:31, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Check Real-Time AQI For India Gyane Haobijam ( talk) 07:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Restructure Intro
Under the title there is a small paragraph referencing different articles that relate to some of the topics incorporated in the article. Instead of being the first thing the reader sees, this paragraph should be broken up into its respected topics of air pollution and placed under the corresponding subsection. For example, the link to medical theory of bad air should be put at the bottom of “Health effects,” this way the reader can easily find and reference it.
Regulation: Rename & Add Info
Under regulations there are two sections “Canada” and “Germany.” Under the subtitle “Canada” is a detailed explanation of Canada’s air quality health index with clear charts and graphics. While the section is cohesive it should not be under the “Regulation” section because it doesn’t discuss or provide any information on the regulations Canada has in place for air pollution. It only explains the levels of the AQHI and the pollutants it measures. Additionally, in the next subsection titled “Germany” there is only one sentence which is linked to a different wikipedia webpage. If the author had no intention on including Germany’s air standards and index then the subsection should have been deleted entirely. Also, there is no reasoning as to why the author chose Canada and Germany as the two examples for air quality laws, nor does the author mention the actual air pollution laws of either country even thought the section is titled “Regulations.” The section should be renamed, “Air Quality Index” and Germany should either be deleted or more countries should be listed so the reader can compare indexes among different countries.
Expired Link
Under the section “Pollutants” the bullet point “Particulate matter / particles” is linked to a webpage that no longer exists. The information should be updated.
Jbohey (
talk) 22:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
I removed "substances, physical" above since there are no physical substances that modify something yet are inert. Koyaanis Qatsi
ATTENTION: The only thing that I see when I view this page is the words "GOD WILL SAVE!!!!" I do not know how to fix this but figured that it was worth mentioning, seeing as probably no one can view this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.98.18 ( talk) 04:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I noticed that there is an it's that should be its Builtlikegod ( talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd argue that BreezoMeter's Air Pollution Heat Map has the highest and most accurate resolution (up to 500m according to them) showcasing air pollution around the globe, here is an example link for the Paris area: https://breezometer.com/air-quality-map/city/paris -- Damsel of Death ( talk) 08:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the subtitle ‘Cities’, the text currently reads:
Air pollution is usually concentrated in densely populated metropolitan areas, especially in developing countries where environmental regulations are relatively lax … by the local university in Sheffield, UK.
I would like to add the following paragraph:
Quarmby et al (2019) conduct a review of the evidence behind air quality strategies and technologies, with a focus on road transport in urban areas, because air pollution tends to be worse in cities, and the main source is fossil fuel vehicles. They draw on the environmental science and policy literature to provide interdisciplinary insight into the most effective air quality policy measures. The most promising initiatives include active travel infrastructure, roadside barriers, low emission zones, and low speed limits. Technologies which remove pollution from the air largely remain unproven, especially at the scale needed to make a significant impact. The combinations of policies from three cities which rank highly for air quality are reviewed; one important finding is that policies are most effective when they are a part of a mutually reinforcing suite of measures. Policies consistent across the cities studied are good public transport coverage, a good cycle network, and financial incentives for electric vehicle purchase. [1] Palihue ( talk) 12:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
thumb Mark König ( talk) 10:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This might just be a single study and so not yet ready for inclusion in the encyclopedia, but a subject worth watching or possibly researching the scientific consensus about if anyone's interested. -- Beland ( talk) 02:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
In 2013, the World Health Organization recognised outdoor air pollution (as well as particulate matter in outdoor air pollution specifically) as carcinogenic to humans.
Could someone add this to the article ? For instance in legend of the first picture ?
Sajak Géomédia ( talk) 20:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC).
I would appreciate it if there were an additional source measuring the contribution of each of the man-made and the natural sources to the total amount of air pollution.
Melaneas ( talk) 12:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This content was in pollution but I am wondering if it should be included in air pollution instead?
Air pollution fluctuations have been known to strongly depend on the weather dynamics. A recent study developed a multi-layered network analysis and detected strong interlinks between the geopotential height of the upper air ( 5 km) and surface air pollution in both China and the USA. [1] This study indicates that Rossby waves significantly affect air pollution fluctuations through the development of cyclone and anticyclone systems, and further affect the local stability of the air and the winds. The Rossby waves impact on air pollution has been observed in the daily fluctuations in surface air pollution. Thus, the impact of Rossby waves on human life is significant and rapid warming of the Arctic could slow down Rossby waves, thus increasing human health risks. EMsmile ( talk) 03:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
@ Zefr: There seems to be a mistake in this edit here: it states that air pollution causes "premature deaths on average of 1 year" [ sic], without describing the number of deaths per year. Jarble ( talk) 22:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
You should add the causes also 2409:4042:70E:A7D0:F064:DA0A:3B28:719D ( talk) 17:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dy1001.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 13:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jbohey.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a note that the diagram about air pollution in cities that refers to EU limits and WHO guidelines (this one: /info/en/?search=File:Air_pollution_exposure_in_cities_-_EU_limits_vs_WHO_guidelines.svg) needs updating in line with the revised 2021 WHO guidelines. 45154james ( talk) 14:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Is air pollution and atmospheric solution same? 110.235.237.244 ( talk) 09:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wl2671, XChen0219 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by FULBERT ( talk) 15:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VenusL ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by VenusL ( talk) 16:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sssara7 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sssara7 ( talk) 03:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
There is a tag but what is it for exactly please? If it has been fixed please remove the tag Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
"As the source of available carbon in the carbon cycle, atmospheric CO2 is the primary carbon source for life on Earth", according to our own article on the subject.
It is a slanderous false equivalence to place this along with sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and other actual pollutants.
If you wish to mention it as a greenhouse gas, that should be a separate assertion, and WP:DUE credit should be given before its reputation is smeared, which distracts from the urgent problem. Jaredscribe ( talk) 00:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Please add info about the AQI scale used by the EPA in the US.- 71.174.186.40 ( talk) 14:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
An additional section could describe how air pollution has changed since pre-industrial revolution, or how it has affected global warming. Also, it might be beneficial to further describe greenhouse gases. Overall, the structure is very organized and easy to follow. The 2014 World Health Organization report mentioned in the opening section could also work well in the health effects section! Amcgoo ( talk) 03:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Air pollution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
It was mentioned on the Today programme on 28 August 2018 can reduce intelligence - does any one think this could go in the article? Vorbee ( talk) 07:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Brian Everlasting, I don't know what you are playing at. But anyone trying to describe this graph as "fluctuating or changing" rather than "accelerating" is either a dyed-in-the-wool climate change denier (and thus has no business editing this article) or incompetent at interpreting graphs (and thus has no business editing this article). Stop it. Your contributions have been almost uniformly bad, and you seem determined to keep up the record. The next block is not going to be far away with this behaviour. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 10:31, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Check Real-Time AQI For India Gyane Haobijam ( talk) 07:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Restructure Intro
Under the title there is a small paragraph referencing different articles that relate to some of the topics incorporated in the article. Instead of being the first thing the reader sees, this paragraph should be broken up into its respected topics of air pollution and placed under the corresponding subsection. For example, the link to medical theory of bad air should be put at the bottom of “Health effects,” this way the reader can easily find and reference it.
Regulation: Rename & Add Info
Under regulations there are two sections “Canada” and “Germany.” Under the subtitle “Canada” is a detailed explanation of Canada’s air quality health index with clear charts and graphics. While the section is cohesive it should not be under the “Regulation” section because it doesn’t discuss or provide any information on the regulations Canada has in place for air pollution. It only explains the levels of the AQHI and the pollutants it measures. Additionally, in the next subsection titled “Germany” there is only one sentence which is linked to a different wikipedia webpage. If the author had no intention on including Germany’s air standards and index then the subsection should have been deleted entirely. Also, there is no reasoning as to why the author chose Canada and Germany as the two examples for air quality laws, nor does the author mention the actual air pollution laws of either country even thought the section is titled “Regulations.” The section should be renamed, “Air Quality Index” and Germany should either be deleted or more countries should be listed so the reader can compare indexes among different countries.
Expired Link
Under the section “Pollutants” the bullet point “Particulate matter / particles” is linked to a webpage that no longer exists. The information should be updated.
Jbohey (
talk) 22:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
I removed "substances, physical" above since there are no physical substances that modify something yet are inert. Koyaanis Qatsi
ATTENTION: The only thing that I see when I view this page is the words "GOD WILL SAVE!!!!" I do not know how to fix this but figured that it was worth mentioning, seeing as probably no one can view this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.98.18 ( talk) 04:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I noticed that there is an it's that should be its Builtlikegod ( talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I'd argue that BreezoMeter's Air Pollution Heat Map has the highest and most accurate resolution (up to 500m according to them) showcasing air pollution around the globe, here is an example link for the Paris area: https://breezometer.com/air-quality-map/city/paris -- Damsel of Death ( talk) 08:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under the subtitle ‘Cities’, the text currently reads:
Air pollution is usually concentrated in densely populated metropolitan areas, especially in developing countries where environmental regulations are relatively lax … by the local university in Sheffield, UK.
I would like to add the following paragraph:
Quarmby et al (2019) conduct a review of the evidence behind air quality strategies and technologies, with a focus on road transport in urban areas, because air pollution tends to be worse in cities, and the main source is fossil fuel vehicles. They draw on the environmental science and policy literature to provide interdisciplinary insight into the most effective air quality policy measures. The most promising initiatives include active travel infrastructure, roadside barriers, low emission zones, and low speed limits. Technologies which remove pollution from the air largely remain unproven, especially at the scale needed to make a significant impact. The combinations of policies from three cities which rank highly for air quality are reviewed; one important finding is that policies are most effective when they are a part of a mutually reinforcing suite of measures. Policies consistent across the cities studied are good public transport coverage, a good cycle network, and financial incentives for electric vehicle purchase. [1] Palihue ( talk) 12:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Air pollution has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
thumb Mark König ( talk) 10:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
This might just be a single study and so not yet ready for inclusion in the encyclopedia, but a subject worth watching or possibly researching the scientific consensus about if anyone's interested. -- Beland ( talk) 02:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
In 2013, the World Health Organization recognised outdoor air pollution (as well as particulate matter in outdoor air pollution specifically) as carcinogenic to humans.
Could someone add this to the article ? For instance in legend of the first picture ?
Sajak Géomédia ( talk) 20:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC).
I would appreciate it if there were an additional source measuring the contribution of each of the man-made and the natural sources to the total amount of air pollution.
Melaneas ( talk) 12:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This content was in pollution but I am wondering if it should be included in air pollution instead?
Air pollution fluctuations have been known to strongly depend on the weather dynamics. A recent study developed a multi-layered network analysis and detected strong interlinks between the geopotential height of the upper air ( 5 km) and surface air pollution in both China and the USA. [1] This study indicates that Rossby waves significantly affect air pollution fluctuations through the development of cyclone and anticyclone systems, and further affect the local stability of the air and the winds. The Rossby waves impact on air pollution has been observed in the daily fluctuations in surface air pollution. Thus, the impact of Rossby waves on human life is significant and rapid warming of the Arctic could slow down Rossby waves, thus increasing human health risks. EMsmile ( talk) 03:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
@ Zefr: There seems to be a mistake in this edit here: it states that air pollution causes "premature deaths on average of 1 year" [ sic], without describing the number of deaths per year. Jarble ( talk) 22:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
You should add the causes also 2409:4042:70E:A7D0:F064:DA0A:3B28:719D ( talk) 17:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dy1001.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 13:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 18 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jbohey.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 17:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Just a note that the diagram about air pollution in cities that refers to EU limits and WHO guidelines (this one: /info/en/?search=File:Air_pollution_exposure_in_cities_-_EU_limits_vs_WHO_guidelines.svg) needs updating in line with the revised 2021 WHO guidelines. 45154james ( talk) 14:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Is air pollution and atmospheric solution same? 110.235.237.244 ( talk) 09:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 July 2022 and 16 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wl2671, XChen0219 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by FULBERT ( talk) 15:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VenusL ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by VenusL ( talk) 16:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sssara7 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sssara7 ( talk) 03:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
There is a tag but what is it for exactly please? If it has been fixed please remove the tag Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
"As the source of available carbon in the carbon cycle, atmospheric CO2 is the primary carbon source for life on Earth", according to our own article on the subject.
It is a slanderous false equivalence to place this along with sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and other actual pollutants.
If you wish to mention it as a greenhouse gas, that should be a separate assertion, and WP:DUE credit should be given before its reputation is smeared, which distracts from the urgent problem. Jaredscribe ( talk) 00:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)