Affect labeling was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 5, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that posting one's feelings on
social media is a form of
affect labeling, and may help reduce emotional distress? |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Created by Sdolbier ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 01:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next week or so. I'll be using the template below. Thanks!
Ganesha811 (
talk) 01:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
N/A - no images for the time being | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
Affect labeling was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 5, 2020. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that posting one's feelings on
social media is a form of
affect labeling, and may help reduce emotional distress? |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 23:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Created by Sdolbier ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 01:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next week or so. I'll be using the template below. Thanks!
Ganesha811 (
talk) 01:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
N/A - no images for the time being | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |