This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
911 (emergency telephone number) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
911 (emergency telephone number) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I live in Egypt, and calling 911 would do the emergency call as well as 112 Soviera0 ( talk) 12:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
This is not a close run thing. The use of 911 is so prominent that we really should just move the page to 911, WP:NATURALDAB be damned because this is not at all the WP:COMMON WP:ENGLISH name and we're giving it WP:UNDUE importance pretending it is. Similarly, it is by far the most common meaning of "911" among most native English speakers and most Wikipedians. The disambig page shouldn't be parked at the main real estate.
If we keep it here at 9-1-1 only for the natural dab, we should make that clear within the article and still use 911 consistently in the running text outside of the intro sentence and Name section. — LlywelynII 20:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Others have repeatedly made the same point in the archives above, apparently. — LlywelynII 22:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
In the UK the emergency number map is 999, not 112. The map needs to be corrected. 163.120.111.178 ( talk) 22:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. By numbers this is 5-3 4-4 in support of the move. Most opposers cite
WP:NATURAL; however, I note that NATURAL says Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title, is sometimes preferred.
(emphasis mine) Why exactly natural disambiguation should be preferred for this article is not discussed, which weakens the "oppose" opinions. (
closed by non-admin page mover)
feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (
talk) 15:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Edit: Awesome Aasim should be "oppose" regarding the proposed new title, so numerically this should be 4-4. However, the difference in the strength of arguments still stands; the "oppose" arguments are generally weaker than the "support" arguments. I therefore still find
consensus to move based on reasons based in policy, sources, and common sense
.
feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (
talk) 02:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
9-1-1 →
911 (emergency telephone number) – The current spelling "9-1-1" is hardly ever used
[1] and is therefore a suboptimal search term / page title for Wikipedia. I'm proposing to rename the article to
911 (emergency telephone number) that would also bring about consistency with nearly all other articles about emergency numbers:
— kashmīrī TALK 12:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
and the world? To me, 911 (number), a universally recognised subject, would be the primary topic in the world. Most of the world has never heard of nor will possibly ever hear of that number's use in NANP countries. — kashmīrī TALK 20:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
162 etc., I didn't see your reply. On looking, I think that N11 codes are less important than Emergency telephone numbers. By a long way. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 10:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
I need to know Philippines police help me or no 2A00:F28:FF02:7EF1:39FA:4579:9F2:9855 ( talk) 06:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
911 (emergency telephone number) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
911 (emergency telephone number) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I live in Egypt, and calling 911 would do the emergency call as well as 112 Soviera0 ( talk) 12:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
This is not a close run thing. The use of 911 is so prominent that we really should just move the page to 911, WP:NATURALDAB be damned because this is not at all the WP:COMMON WP:ENGLISH name and we're giving it WP:UNDUE importance pretending it is. Similarly, it is by far the most common meaning of "911" among most native English speakers and most Wikipedians. The disambig page shouldn't be parked at the main real estate.
If we keep it here at 9-1-1 only for the natural dab, we should make that clear within the article and still use 911 consistently in the running text outside of the intro sentence and Name section. — LlywelynII 20:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Others have repeatedly made the same point in the archives above, apparently. — LlywelynII 22:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
In the UK the emergency number map is 999, not 112. The map needs to be corrected. 163.120.111.178 ( talk) 22:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. By numbers this is 5-3 4-4 in support of the move. Most opposers cite
WP:NATURAL; however, I note that NATURAL says Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title, is sometimes preferred.
(emphasis mine) Why exactly natural disambiguation should be preferred for this article is not discussed, which weakens the "oppose" opinions. (
closed by non-admin page mover)
feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (
talk) 15:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Edit: Awesome Aasim should be "oppose" regarding the proposed new title, so numerically this should be 4-4. However, the difference in the strength of arguments still stands; the "oppose" arguments are generally weaker than the "support" arguments. I therefore still find
consensus to move based on reasons based in policy, sources, and common sense
.
feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 (
talk) 02:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
9-1-1 →
911 (emergency telephone number) – The current spelling "9-1-1" is hardly ever used
[1] and is therefore a suboptimal search term / page title for Wikipedia. I'm proposing to rename the article to
911 (emergency telephone number) that would also bring about consistency with nearly all other articles about emergency numbers:
— kashmīrī TALK 12:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
and the world? To me, 911 (number), a universally recognised subject, would be the primary topic in the world. Most of the world has never heard of nor will possibly ever hear of that number's use in NANP countries. — kashmīrī TALK 20:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
162 etc., I didn't see your reply. On looking, I think that N11 codes are less important than Emergency telephone numbers. By a long way. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 10:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
I need to know Philippines police help me or no 2A00:F28:FF02:7EF1:39FA:4579:9F2:9855 ( talk) 06:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)