This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2019 Bolivian protests article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
A news item involving 2019 Bolivian protests was featured on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
In the news section on the following dates:
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
As per title, there is an attributed claim in the article about Costas being the only independent member of the TSE. I am wondering whether it is relevant to include? I personally think that a description used by one relatively small website ( Infobae) isn't of great importance. Note that the claim wasn't even attributed before I intervened. BeŻet ( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Can somebody translate from Spanish to english and added them to English Wikipedia article. It is very interesting to give more information:
"===28 de octubre===
Se intensifica la contestación con numerosos bloqueos y enfrentamientos con las fuerzas del orden y entre manifestantes a favor y en contra del Presidente Morales en La Paz, Cochabamba y Santa Cruz.
La Paz, Bolivia
Ante los bloqueos de los puntos estratégicos que impedían la normal circulación de vehículos y de transporte público en la mañana, la demanda del servicio de transporte Mi Teleférico, fue tan masiva que se colapsó. La Dirección Departamental de Educación de La Paz informó que las labores educativas serian normales, sin embargo, el Magisterio asumió un paro de 24 horas, con suspensión de actividades escolares.
Integrantes del Sindicato Mixto de Mineros de Huanuni y otros centros, llegaron a la ciudad de La Paz para respaldar al presidente Evo Morales, en una movilización que se abrió paso con el uso de cachorros de dinamita, infringiendo la Ley 400 (Artículo 8) y el Decreto Supremo 2888. El estruendo de las dinamitas seguía el recorrido por el Prado paceño. “Pedimos disculpas a la población por el ruido de las dinamitas, es parte de nuestras costumbres”, dijo el secretario general del Sindicato de Trabajadores Mineros de Huanuni, David Choque. A su lado se encontraba el máximo dirigente de la Central Obrera Boliviana (COB), Juan Carlos Guarachi. Mientras los mineros llegaban a la plaza Obelisco, los funcionarios públicos se apostaron en el sector para recibirlos con aplausos. Insultaron y agredieron a vecinos y estudiantes de la facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Mayor de San Andrés que bloqueaban el sector.
Se realizó un cabildo en horas de la tarde, en la avenida Costanera de La Paz se escucharon voces que demandaban la salida de Morales como solución al conflicto social, que derivó en ataques violentos de seguidores del Presidente contra vecinos que bloquean pacíficamente las calles, denunciando fraude electoral.
Con palos y piedras, personas afines al Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS) y chóferes atacaron en la mañana a viviendas y un automóvil particulares en la zona Sur de La Paz, los vecinos filmaron esos hechos y publicarlos en redes sociales
Source: ( https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestas_en_Bolivia_de_2019)
Indonesian Wikipedia already add some Spanish language article to they version of article with local language. Hanafi455 ( talk) 00:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
In case this needs to be discussed: I have removed the YouTube screenshot as it does not belong in the article: YouTube is not a usable source on Wikipedia, and the caption is an editor's interpretation of what is seen, and therefore counts as WP:SYNTH. BeŻet ( talk) 21:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
There is no source provided for the image- I assumed that you were suggesting the image not having a source was your reason for disqualifying the caption. In any case, the source for the image is also the source for the caption, it could have easily been copied from commons. Of course, in the interest of not making the article too image-heavy and messy, I don't mind the image being removed - I only respond because of your initial statements that
YouTube is not a usable sourceand that the
caption is an editor's interpretation of what is seen, when neither of these are in any way true. YouTube can be used, and the video gave the detail that was in the caption (and perhaps should have been copied over from commons). As long as we agree on those points, we're good. Kingsif ( talk) 00:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
a fresh ballot sheet found in the streets of La Paz; a source is required to indicate that this is an accurate description of what the paper is and where it was found. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 17:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
If the source for the caption is just what the interviewee says, then it should be attributed; I've done so. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 20:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Jamez42: You tagged a section of text describing (with attribution) an analysis by The Nation as being potentially undue, as well as changing the wording in which the information was presented. I have partially reverted this change because (a) it made the text more awkward and (b) it led to some statements sourced from The Nation being unattributed. If you feel that the order changes are important, we can discuss them here.
As for the undue weight tag, WP:RSP says:
There is consensus that The Nation is generally reliable. Most editors consider The Nation a partisan source whose statements should be attributed. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from The Nation constitutes due weight in the article and conforms to the biographies of living persons policy.
However, I don't think this means that any and all content from The Nation should be considered undue. Due and undue weight has to be judged in the context of the article and the source in question. Could you please explain why you think this specific text is undue? — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 22:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Since the coup happened, the people protesting have changed, and right now we are dealing with a few days of protests against Anez. I think this creates an interesting technical challenge as the nature of the protests has changed, and this should be entailed somehow in the article. It is likely that the Anez protests can last for quite some time. We also need to account for the people killed in the latter protests (two victims so far). I just wanted to start the discussion about how to deal with this situation. Should both protests be covered in separate articles or in the same one? How does that affect the infobox? BeŻet ( talk) 22:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
There are some problems that I think that will come up. We have removed the causes and the goals from the infobox, and the timeline is being split between anti and pro-MAS protests, when both of them have taken place both before and after Morales' resignation. Maybe the goals and causes of the Pro-Morales' protests can be places in the political crisis article, and a protests section developed. Any thoughts? -- Jamez42 ( talk) 12:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Yesterday, i found that on Spanish and French Wikipedia, there are a statement about a OAS about election audit investigation, the statement originally was ini Spanish, then translated in French. When i found the statement. It is very interesting to add the statement on Indonesian and English Wikipedia as well and translate the originally Spanish source. But in case of english, there are two versions, in Spanish and English translation with additional official English source from the same organization.
The statement from OAS on Spanish like this, and the statement was translated to French and Indonesian Wikipedias [5] [6]:
Desde la Secretaría General de la OEA reiteramos la disposición para cooperar en la búsqueda de las soluciones democráticas para el país, es por ello que en virtud de la gravedad de las denuncias y análisis respecto al proceso electoral que me ha trasladado el equipo de auditores nos cabe manifestar que la primera ronda de las elecciones celebrada el 20 de octubre pasado debe ser anulada y el proceso electoral debe comenzar nuevamente, efectuándose la primera ronda tan pronto existan nuevas condiciones que den nuevas garantías para su celebración, entre ellas una nueva composición del órgano electoral. Por supuesto, aun resta el detallado informe final al respecto que se tramitara conforme los supuestos establecidos.
But why in English the statement from OAS was removed because is interesting to see the evidence of election fraud. I'm from Indonesia but i was very interesting about current situation in Bolivia throughout internet so i contributed in Wikipedia. Hanafi455 ( talk) 05:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Rural areas are seeing police surrendering to protesters and the protesters taking arsenals of guns. The trade unions are declaring a siege of the capital. Blood shed and murder is already sky rocketing under the dictatorship. Call it what it is. AHC300 ( talk) 23:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The article right now makes it out to be a bit too much a binary between Evo on one side and protesters + new admin on the other side. Especially now with Áñez taking the presidency there groups that called for Evo to resign are also protesting/making statements against the new Áñez admin, not really clear that all of the people that are protesting against Anez are supportive of Evo/MAS, e.g https://www.paginasiete.bo/nacional/2019/11/16/el-alto-cumple-su-quinto-dia-de-movilizaciones-entre-division-debilitamiento-237575.html 88.95.176.49 ( talk) 12:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps a simple solution would be to split pre-coup protests (anti-Morales) and post-coup protests (anti-Áñez) into two separate articles, so each would have its own infobox and each would be smaller in size that the current combined article, which would certainly increase the readability. This would also make a nice timeline: 1) pre-coup protests 2) coup 3) post-coup protests. Only the names of the two new articles would have to be figured out. 193.198.162.14 ( talk) 10:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand the point of including the referendum map image. This was a popular referendum, so regions are completely meaningless in displaying information, and this could be interpreted as an attempt to suggest that the difference between the Yes and No vote was larger than in reality. I'd support removing the image, as it serves no purpose. BeŻet ( talk) 13:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Jamez42: Snarkily mimicking the words of another editor is rude and unproductive. These maps are useful in elections where geography makes a difference, e.g., where there are electoral districts which each get a specified number of seats. They are not useful for referenda, where one person has one vote. Moreover, there is a great deal of work on how this kind of map is misleading. Here is a short article about it from NatGeo for your reference: [7]. It's about the US and how different states have different numbers of electoral votes; it also applies here given that different parts of Bolivia have differing populations. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 01:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@ BeŻet: @ Cmonghost: @ Jamez42: I can see about adding shading. Jamez42 is right about the use of such maps in election articles.---- ZiaLater ( talk) 17:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. They are often an important illustrative aid to understanding. When possible, find better images and improve captions instead of simply removing poor or inappropriate ones, especially on pages with few visuals.. This means that I you think that there could be a better image for the section (say for example, results by municipality), you should be WP:BOLD and include it. Regardless, the image is relevant to illustrate the results of the 2016 referendum, which is one of the main reasons why the protests started. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 12:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
You added the map. Shortly thereafter it was removed. It is up to you to develop a consensus for its inclusion. You don't get to add content to an article and insist that it remain in the article while not acknowledging arguments to the contrary. It has now been explained to you multiple times why the image is not relevant to the article and you have not provided a substantive response. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 17:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
The more visible the statement, and the longer it stands unchallenged, the stronger the implication of consensus is.. I am not ignoring the rest of the policy, my point is that this time the consensus should be built towards the revert, not necessarily towards the image. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 17:27, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Given the fact that several editors are questioning the inclusion of the map, I will now remove it, until its inclusion is justified. BeŻet ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
A brief read through of the lede alone shows many issues. This would prompt a reexamination of the content of this page in general. Some I have fixed, but there should be awareness of this. There is also a woeful lack of sources from Bolivia which have a lot more detailed and accurate information.
The 6th November entry contains a possibly erroneous piece of information. It states that the attackers urinated on Ms. Guzman. While one of our sources states that, I had not read that detail in half a dozen reports of the events, including the interview given by the woman herself used as one of our three references. If this is true, I would expect it to have been mentioned elsewhere as it seems pretty extreme. AA quick google search is not showing up any corroborating evidence for this. Crmoorhead ( talk) 21:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The infobox presents two sides to the conflict: "Morales loyalists" and "Áñez loyalists". This gives the impression that the MAS opposition or anti-Morales movement during the 2019 Bolivian protests was led by Jeanine Áñez. However Áñez, as a Beni senator prior to the protests, had a relatively minor role during the crisis itself with more prominent figures such as Carlos Mesa and Luis Fernando Camacho being nominally considered the main actors behinds the protests, and it was only after Morales' resignation that she was summoned by the Congress to take up the role of interim president. ( Source). The infobox should be changed to more accurately reflect the roles each person had in the conflict.-- Metroxed ( talk) 12:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Just reading further into these issues, it would be great to see the impact of wildfires on the reasoning behind these protests. I don't have the capacity to add this to the article, so placing the comment here if someone else can look into it. Jamzze ( talk) 20:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2019 Bolivian protests article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
A news item involving 2019 Bolivian protests was featured on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
In the news section on the following dates:
|
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
As per title, there is an attributed claim in the article about Costas being the only independent member of the TSE. I am wondering whether it is relevant to include? I personally think that a description used by one relatively small website ( Infobae) isn't of great importance. Note that the claim wasn't even attributed before I intervened. BeŻet ( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Can somebody translate from Spanish to english and added them to English Wikipedia article. It is very interesting to give more information:
"===28 de octubre===
Se intensifica la contestación con numerosos bloqueos y enfrentamientos con las fuerzas del orden y entre manifestantes a favor y en contra del Presidente Morales en La Paz, Cochabamba y Santa Cruz.
La Paz, Bolivia
Ante los bloqueos de los puntos estratégicos que impedían la normal circulación de vehículos y de transporte público en la mañana, la demanda del servicio de transporte Mi Teleférico, fue tan masiva que se colapsó. La Dirección Departamental de Educación de La Paz informó que las labores educativas serian normales, sin embargo, el Magisterio asumió un paro de 24 horas, con suspensión de actividades escolares.
Integrantes del Sindicato Mixto de Mineros de Huanuni y otros centros, llegaron a la ciudad de La Paz para respaldar al presidente Evo Morales, en una movilización que se abrió paso con el uso de cachorros de dinamita, infringiendo la Ley 400 (Artículo 8) y el Decreto Supremo 2888. El estruendo de las dinamitas seguía el recorrido por el Prado paceño. “Pedimos disculpas a la población por el ruido de las dinamitas, es parte de nuestras costumbres”, dijo el secretario general del Sindicato de Trabajadores Mineros de Huanuni, David Choque. A su lado se encontraba el máximo dirigente de la Central Obrera Boliviana (COB), Juan Carlos Guarachi. Mientras los mineros llegaban a la plaza Obelisco, los funcionarios públicos se apostaron en el sector para recibirlos con aplausos. Insultaron y agredieron a vecinos y estudiantes de la facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Mayor de San Andrés que bloqueaban el sector.
Se realizó un cabildo en horas de la tarde, en la avenida Costanera de La Paz se escucharon voces que demandaban la salida de Morales como solución al conflicto social, que derivó en ataques violentos de seguidores del Presidente contra vecinos que bloquean pacíficamente las calles, denunciando fraude electoral.
Con palos y piedras, personas afines al Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS) y chóferes atacaron en la mañana a viviendas y un automóvil particulares en la zona Sur de La Paz, los vecinos filmaron esos hechos y publicarlos en redes sociales
Source: ( https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestas_en_Bolivia_de_2019)
Indonesian Wikipedia already add some Spanish language article to they version of article with local language. Hanafi455 ( talk) 00:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
In case this needs to be discussed: I have removed the YouTube screenshot as it does not belong in the article: YouTube is not a usable source on Wikipedia, and the caption is an editor's interpretation of what is seen, and therefore counts as WP:SYNTH. BeŻet ( talk) 21:57, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
There is no source provided for the image- I assumed that you were suggesting the image not having a source was your reason for disqualifying the caption. In any case, the source for the image is also the source for the caption, it could have easily been copied from commons. Of course, in the interest of not making the article too image-heavy and messy, I don't mind the image being removed - I only respond because of your initial statements that
YouTube is not a usable sourceand that the
caption is an editor's interpretation of what is seen, when neither of these are in any way true. YouTube can be used, and the video gave the detail that was in the caption (and perhaps should have been copied over from commons). As long as we agree on those points, we're good. Kingsif ( talk) 00:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
a fresh ballot sheet found in the streets of La Paz; a source is required to indicate that this is an accurate description of what the paper is and where it was found. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 17:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
If the source for the caption is just what the interviewee says, then it should be attributed; I've done so. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 20:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Jamez42: You tagged a section of text describing (with attribution) an analysis by The Nation as being potentially undue, as well as changing the wording in which the information was presented. I have partially reverted this change because (a) it made the text more awkward and (b) it led to some statements sourced from The Nation being unattributed. If you feel that the order changes are important, we can discuss them here.
As for the undue weight tag, WP:RSP says:
There is consensus that The Nation is generally reliable. Most editors consider The Nation a partisan source whose statements should be attributed. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from The Nation constitutes due weight in the article and conforms to the biographies of living persons policy.
However, I don't think this means that any and all content from The Nation should be considered undue. Due and undue weight has to be judged in the context of the article and the source in question. Could you please explain why you think this specific text is undue? — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 22:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Since the coup happened, the people protesting have changed, and right now we are dealing with a few days of protests against Anez. I think this creates an interesting technical challenge as the nature of the protests has changed, and this should be entailed somehow in the article. It is likely that the Anez protests can last for quite some time. We also need to account for the people killed in the latter protests (two victims so far). I just wanted to start the discussion about how to deal with this situation. Should both protests be covered in separate articles or in the same one? How does that affect the infobox? BeŻet ( talk) 22:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
There are some problems that I think that will come up. We have removed the causes and the goals from the infobox, and the timeline is being split between anti and pro-MAS protests, when both of them have taken place both before and after Morales' resignation. Maybe the goals and causes of the Pro-Morales' protests can be places in the political crisis article, and a protests section developed. Any thoughts? -- Jamez42 ( talk) 12:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Yesterday, i found that on Spanish and French Wikipedia, there are a statement about a OAS about election audit investigation, the statement originally was ini Spanish, then translated in French. When i found the statement. It is very interesting to add the statement on Indonesian and English Wikipedia as well and translate the originally Spanish source. But in case of english, there are two versions, in Spanish and English translation with additional official English source from the same organization.
The statement from OAS on Spanish like this, and the statement was translated to French and Indonesian Wikipedias [5] [6]:
Desde la Secretaría General de la OEA reiteramos la disposición para cooperar en la búsqueda de las soluciones democráticas para el país, es por ello que en virtud de la gravedad de las denuncias y análisis respecto al proceso electoral que me ha trasladado el equipo de auditores nos cabe manifestar que la primera ronda de las elecciones celebrada el 20 de octubre pasado debe ser anulada y el proceso electoral debe comenzar nuevamente, efectuándose la primera ronda tan pronto existan nuevas condiciones que den nuevas garantías para su celebración, entre ellas una nueva composición del órgano electoral. Por supuesto, aun resta el detallado informe final al respecto que se tramitara conforme los supuestos establecidos.
But why in English the statement from OAS was removed because is interesting to see the evidence of election fraud. I'm from Indonesia but i was very interesting about current situation in Bolivia throughout internet so i contributed in Wikipedia. Hanafi455 ( talk) 05:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Rural areas are seeing police surrendering to protesters and the protesters taking arsenals of guns. The trade unions are declaring a siege of the capital. Blood shed and murder is already sky rocketing under the dictatorship. Call it what it is. AHC300 ( talk) 23:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
The article right now makes it out to be a bit too much a binary between Evo on one side and protesters + new admin on the other side. Especially now with Áñez taking the presidency there groups that called for Evo to resign are also protesting/making statements against the new Áñez admin, not really clear that all of the people that are protesting against Anez are supportive of Evo/MAS, e.g https://www.paginasiete.bo/nacional/2019/11/16/el-alto-cumple-su-quinto-dia-de-movilizaciones-entre-division-debilitamiento-237575.html 88.95.176.49 ( talk) 12:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Perhaps a simple solution would be to split pre-coup protests (anti-Morales) and post-coup protests (anti-Áñez) into two separate articles, so each would have its own infobox and each would be smaller in size that the current combined article, which would certainly increase the readability. This would also make a nice timeline: 1) pre-coup protests 2) coup 3) post-coup protests. Only the names of the two new articles would have to be figured out. 193.198.162.14 ( talk) 10:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand the point of including the referendum map image. This was a popular referendum, so regions are completely meaningless in displaying information, and this could be interpreted as an attempt to suggest that the difference between the Yes and No vote was larger than in reality. I'd support removing the image, as it serves no purpose. BeŻet ( talk) 13:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
@ Jamez42: Snarkily mimicking the words of another editor is rude and unproductive. These maps are useful in elections where geography makes a difference, e.g., where there are electoral districts which each get a specified number of seats. They are not useful for referenda, where one person has one vote. Moreover, there is a great deal of work on how this kind of map is misleading. Here is a short article about it from NatGeo for your reference: [7]. It's about the US and how different states have different numbers of electoral votes; it also applies here given that different parts of Bolivia have differing populations. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 01:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@ BeŻet: @ Cmonghost: @ Jamez42: I can see about adding shading. Jamez42 is right about the use of such maps in election articles.---- ZiaLater ( talk) 17:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative. They are often an important illustrative aid to understanding. When possible, find better images and improve captions instead of simply removing poor or inappropriate ones, especially on pages with few visuals.. This means that I you think that there could be a better image for the section (say for example, results by municipality), you should be WP:BOLD and include it. Regardless, the image is relevant to illustrate the results of the 2016 referendum, which is one of the main reasons why the protests started. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 12:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
You added the map. Shortly thereafter it was removed. It is up to you to develop a consensus for its inclusion. You don't get to add content to an article and insist that it remain in the article while not acknowledging arguments to the contrary. It has now been explained to you multiple times why the image is not relevant to the article and you have not provided a substantive response. — cmonghost 👻 ( talk) 17:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
The more visible the statement, and the longer it stands unchallenged, the stronger the implication of consensus is.. I am not ignoring the rest of the policy, my point is that this time the consensus should be built towards the revert, not necessarily towards the image. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 17:27, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Given the fact that several editors are questioning the inclusion of the map, I will now remove it, until its inclusion is justified. BeŻet ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
A brief read through of the lede alone shows many issues. This would prompt a reexamination of the content of this page in general. Some I have fixed, but there should be awareness of this. There is also a woeful lack of sources from Bolivia which have a lot more detailed and accurate information.
The 6th November entry contains a possibly erroneous piece of information. It states that the attackers urinated on Ms. Guzman. While one of our sources states that, I had not read that detail in half a dozen reports of the events, including the interview given by the woman herself used as one of our three references. If this is true, I would expect it to have been mentioned elsewhere as it seems pretty extreme. AA quick google search is not showing up any corroborating evidence for this. Crmoorhead ( talk) 21:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The infobox presents two sides to the conflict: "Morales loyalists" and "Áñez loyalists". This gives the impression that the MAS opposition or anti-Morales movement during the 2019 Bolivian protests was led by Jeanine Áñez. However Áñez, as a Beni senator prior to the protests, had a relatively minor role during the crisis itself with more prominent figures such as Carlos Mesa and Luis Fernando Camacho being nominally considered the main actors behinds the protests, and it was only after Morales' resignation that she was summoned by the Congress to take up the role of interim president. ( Source). The infobox should be changed to more accurately reflect the roles each person had in the conflict.-- Metroxed ( talk) 12:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Just reading further into these issues, it would be great to see the impact of wildfires on the reasoning behind these protests. I don't have the capacity to add this to the article, so placing the comment here if someone else can look into it. Jamzze ( talk) 20:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)