This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WrestleMania 32 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the discussion was: Not redirected due to no renewed discussion and stalled consensus. TheTMOBGaming2 ( talk) 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
I am formally proposing that this article redirect to WrestleMania#Future until there is officially some build for the event, which means until the Royal Rumble (2016) is done. There seems to be no sourced information that is not currently duplicated at WrestleMania#Future. The official "background" disclaimer for professional wrestling in all PPV articles doesn't count. Pragmatically, this article is a magnet for disruption from IPs and redlinks. Alternatively, we could request to semi-protect the article until February 2016, but some disruption might still slip through. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC) ping @ LM2000: @ TheMeaningOfBlah: @ CRRaysHead90: @ RadioKAOS: @ InedibleHulk:
Where did it come from? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Those unsourced statements in the lede in citations. Same goes for WrestleMania 31. They are WP:OR Could someone better explain to User talk:TheMeaningOfBlah#Manual notification? starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 03:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
My request for page protection went through, this should filter out most of the people who want to dump their speculation until December. My hope for a redirect still stands though. LM2000 ( talk) 04:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
rumoured matches 86.163.235.212 ( talk) 16:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I have found a higher quality PNG of the WrestleMania logo, this one is sized at 1,482 x 529 pixels (The one currently being used on the page is 500 x 200). I found this on the Pro Wrestling Wikia: http://prowrestling.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wrestlemania_32_logo.png The direct link to the full resolution logo is here: http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/prowrestling/images/b/b0/Wrestlemania_32_logo.png/revision/latest?cb=20150123211002
I can't edit the file, but maybe someone else can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby165324 ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry if this is formatted incorrectly, I don't really edit Wikipedia.
Just wanted to point out that the graphic on the right says that WM32 takes place on March 4th 2016 when the correct date is April 3rd.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Category:Professional wrestling in Texas 59.101.98.130 ( talk) 04:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I just want to point out that the projected match card still says the there will be a one on one match for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. Since the Royal Rumble has been modified, there's a chance that the Wrestlemania 32 main event might be a bit different, anyone agree? 147.69.38.96 ( talk) 05:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC) You said The Undertaker would be barred from competing at wrestlemania again. Did you mean banned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch ( talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Is there some space to talk about this topic?
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the theme song which is not supported by a reliable source. 198.108.244.195 ( talk) 13:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I hereby move this to talk. Apart from maybe the date when tickets went on sale this whole package seems unencyclopedic trivia:
Travel packages and individual tickets went on sale on November 6, 2015, with the Gold Circle VIP Packages available for $2,360, and individual tickets ranging from $18 to $1,180. The Gold Circle Packages include seating at ringside, a "VIP Stadium entrance" and a "take-home" folding chair.< ref name=32Tickets> "WrestleMania 32 tickets on sale now". WWE. Retrieved 25 November 2015.</ ref>
Str1977 (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
As far as I know, there has been no confirmation of a singles match for the Divas Title, let alone one featuring either Becky Lynch or Sasha Banks, beyond Charlotte saying so in a promo. For all we know, there could be a Triple Threat or Fatal Four-Way match for the title at the event that's still almost six weeks away. Isn't it premature to list otherwise on this page? Skudrafan1 ( talk) 17:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Charlotte will have a match at Mania. That is confirmed. The opponent is not, which is why the table would say "Charlotte (c) vs. TBD". This shows that the match is confirmed, but the opponent(s) is not. It's not rocket science. -- JDC808 ♫ 17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The type of match between Dean Ambrose and Brock Lesnar is wrong, its a No Holds Barred Street Fight match, according to the official match cards shown in Youtube and other sites
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFbqaHUx0WM Nathalex1 ( talk) 23:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add match: Charlotte Vs. Sasha Banks or Becky Lynch - Divas Championship Geekhunter33 ( talk) 09:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Dose any one know the poster Victor2C ( talk) 21:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The poster should also show other wrestlemania participants Abdurrahmanchamp ( talk) 18:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
The Rock has confirmed he will appear at Wrestlemania, in the description, why does it not say that The Rock will be appearing at the event, WWE.com and The Rock's twitter account have both confirmed it, could you please add in the description that The Rock has confirmed that he will be at the event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.127.41 ( talk) 03:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the new participants for the Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal to be officially listed. Bo Dallas, Curtis Axel, Heath Slater and Adam Rose have been officially announced as entrants in the match tonight on an episode of SmackDown.
source: [1] KO Asylum ( talk) 07:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Per Wrestling Observer, The Battle Royal is now on the Main Card. Link: http://www.f4wonline.com/wwe-news/full-wrestlemania-card-plus-tv-network-and-ppv-schedule-210166 Quoting article for those who cant get through the paywall:
"WWE has officially updated the plans for Sunday's WrestleMania regarding where the different matches will air on the show.
As of right now, and this could change during the week, the Kalisto vs. Ryback U.S. title match will take place at about 4:30 p.m. Central time, 5:30 p.m. Eastern, and will be a WWE Network exclusive.
The USA Network and WWE Network one hour simulcast from 5-6 p.m. local time and 6-7 p.m. Eastern time, which will also air at WWE.com, the WWE app, and YouTube, will have the women's ten person tag team match and the Usos vs. Dudleys match.
The 20 man Andre the Giant Battle Royal will now be on the WrestleMania PPV card." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.42.51 ( talk) 05:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Someone added the claim that the New Day vs. LON match is a handicap match for the titles. However, the only source used thus far says nothing about handicap matches nor does it explicitely speak of a title match. We need sources for this. Str1977 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Str1977 (talk): source - [2] KO Asylum (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Str1977 (talk): Can you or someone include the link into the article because i'm unable to do it at the moment. Everything points to it being a 4-on-3 handicap match. At Roadblock, they made sure to state it was 2 vs. 2 when citing Sheamus and Barrett of LON vs. Big E and Kofi of New Day. source: [3] KO Asylum (talk) 03:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Here's a link that proves the tag team titles will be defended. Here's the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Chris Jericho Vs. AJ Styles 2601:240:4300:10D4:B422:87FB:BD80:77F0 ( talk) 01:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
the most important matches should go on top, followed by secondary main events like the cell match, followed by the other title matches (order: intercontinental, tag team, US and women's or the last two can be switched), followed by the remaining matches, with the pre-show matches lised at the bottom as they're the least important. reading this, you see the first match and think that's the main event match. it's not.
think of it like this - back when you used to buy wrestling videos and dvds, the list of matches at the back, the matches shown at the top of the list is most important, with lesser important matches going further down. it makes sense.
also for notes, make them short and concise. use * and footnotes if it's long and complex, so that the resulting table looks neater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.226.199 ( talk) 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
There's been some back and forth editing over what the "official" poster of the event is. There are two images in question:
1 is here - /info/en/?search=WrestleMania_32#/media/File:WrestleMania_32_poster.jpg
If you check out Stephanie McMahon's Instagram account here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BCiHW2YhEb_/?taken-by=stephaniemcmahon&hl=en, you can see a picture she posted of the real poster hanging on a wall. It is the 1st image I linked. That 1st image has also been shown hanging on the wall in the office during Raw the last few weeks.
There are some people removing that 1st image off the Mania 32 Wiki page and replacing it with the 2nd image. The 2nd image is a photoshopped picture of an image that is used when you sign up for WWE Network, which you can see here: http://www.wwe.com/wwenetwork. The 2nd image is not a poster. It is a fan manipulated image where they added the WrestleMania logo and and the date and other text to make it look like an official poster. Nowhere on WWE.com is the 2nd image I linked shown as an actual poster with text over it. It's a photoshop. A very well done photoshop, but a photoshop nonetheless. Until someone can can prove otherwise, keep the 1st image as the official poster on this Wiki page. OldSkool01 ( talk) 17:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Daniel Bryan retired because of brain damage from too many concussions in his career. Not from his neck injury. Joshua ariel 97 ( talk) 16:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
82.170.115.123 ( talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the match between triple h and roman reigns from for the wwe world heavyweight championship(x) to no disqualification for the wwe world heavyweight championship(y) here is the source with picture http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/691887-wrestlemania-32-main-event-match-possibly-getting-an-added-stipulation 82.170.115.123 ( talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done: Event is currently airing, matter is probably already settled or will be shortly. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 01:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I hereby move the following over here:
In a rare event for WrestleMania main eventers, it was theorized that WWE scripted Reigns not to speak on the last Raw before WrestleMania 32 to avoid him being booed, in a repeat of the Raw before WrestleMania 31 (which Reigns headlined). [1] [2]
Not only is this extreemly strangely worded - it is also not actually included in the source attached which merely said:
Instead of getting a chance to state what this match means to him, Reigns said nothing at all Monday night in Brooklyn. He didn’t have to say much, but something would have sufficed. Instead, it felt like WWE was sort of afraid to put him in front of a hostile crowd for fear of him being booed during his promo. If that was the case, WWE had good reason to feel that way because despite beating up Triple H on multiple occasions and closing the show by doing a cool dive over the top rope, the fans still jeered him.
There is nothing in there about anyone "theorizing" or WWE "scripting". There is also nothing about last years pre-Mania Raw, which makes the inclusion of a RAW report from 2015 all the more pointless. So it's best to put the whole thing away. Str1977 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
References
Can we please list the date? I tuned in at 7pm because usually it's 7-8 preshow 8-11 main show but accoding to results, the 3 pre-show matches all completed? Can someone list a reference to support these? When did this happen? When does the main show happen? Ranze ( talk) 23:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as the end time goes, this WAS in fact the first WWE ppv that went past its scheduled end time. An edit was made stating that WMXX also went over, but that is not true as WMXX was advertised as a 5 hour show that was scheduled through 12am est. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.59.98 ( talk) 15:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
It was a six man tag not a handicap match
The vandalism is insane.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
220.244.228.72 ( talk) 01:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Roman Reigns defeated Triple H by disqualifaction in 28:37 minutes 2.50.150.106 ( talk) 02:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Can we fix the elimination thing.
Why is this not listed under results? WWE acknowledged that this match set a record for the shortest match in WWE Wrestlemania history and that the Rock set a new record.
Why is John Cena even mentioned in the results. No hate to him but he wasn't even with The Rock during those six seconds he faced Erick Rowan. 98.19.214.13 ( talk) 14:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
In the results table, Charlotte should not have a (c) next to her name since she was not the defending Women's Champion. She was the Divas Champion, but the Divas Title was not on the line. The match was to decide who would be the new Women's Champion and when the match was over Lilian announced Charlotte as the NEW Women's Champion. Essentially it was a match for a vacant championship where all 3 women in the match were challengers. Charlotte's Divas Title was not on the line so her having a (c) next to her name doesn't make any sense. This shouldn't be that complicated of an issue, but some people keep editing back in the (c). Hopefully this clearly explains it. OldSkool01 ( talk) 06:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Under the circumstances I can live without a "c" qualifier for Charlotte as long as the footnote remains as it now is: "Charlotte entered the match as Divas Champion, but was crowned WWE Women's Champion at the conclusion of the match." Is that acceptable to you? Str1977 (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Would anyone be interested in reporting on delays on fans not able to enter the stadium or reach their seats?
http://www.pwinsider.com/article/101077/getting-into-att-stadium-is-a-long-tedious-process.html?p=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.5.252 ( talk) 01:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Just like the Pontiac Silverdome that hosted WrestleMania III, why is the attendance of over 101,000 at WrestleMania 32 disputed. Also, where did you get the source that it's disputed? 98.18.59.229 ( talk) 03:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
I removed the following content from this article "WrestleMania 32 consisted of professional wrestling matches that involved wrestlers from pre-existing scripted feuds or storylines that played out on WWE television. Wrestlers portrayed heroes or villains as they followed a series of events that built tension and culminated in a wrestling match or series of matches" because of the following reasons.
1. It's merely stating something that every single reader over the age of 5, would be blatantly aware of. 2. The wording is awful, it sounds like some badly scripted warning on a TV show. 3. It is covered in a lot of detail on the Professional wrestling article, which is linked directly before previous location of the offending content.
If anyone can explain why they think it actually adds to the quality of the article, please explain here. Thanks Spacecowboy420 ( talk) 06:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
@
Spacecowboy420:I agree with the removal of the content in question, this is well known information to people around the world on how pro wrestling works and is not needed in this article. There is no point to it.
Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (
talk)
10:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I've fully protected the article for three days. @ WarMachineWildThing and Danratedrko: Edit summaries are not a substitute for talk page discussion. Danratedrko, I came close to blocking you as you haven't seemed to learned from your last block for personal attacks. Please tone down your rhetoric and discuss content issues here. -- NeilN talk to me 03:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Noted Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ( talk) 04:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Starship.paint: I think someone got them reverted before the lock down. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ( talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Article referenced to dispute the attendance contains opinion saying WWE had to announce over 100,000 and does not describe how Mr. Meltzer came up with the lower figure. Slumpercat ( talk) 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect WrestleMania XXXVI. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 21#WrestleMania XXXVI until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
@ Kakarott: I'm starting this thread for you to discuss why you're inserting fabricated numbers. Please keep discussion here rather than reverting. — Czello ( music) 07:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Heyyo456 ( talk) 03:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
just don’t go into edit war for more than 3 times in the last 24 hoursThis sounds like an invitation for WP:GAMING. — Czello ( music) 08:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This discussion has been borrowed from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling
Copy and pasted thread
|
---|
|
I'm not too familiar with this discussion, but it's clear that there is a dispute. Wikipedia's job is simply to reflect what is written in reliable sources, hence the full range of attendances needs to be mentioned in the infobox with a note that it is disputed. It is not Wikipedia's job to decide which attendance is correct. Hashim-afc ( talk) 16:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Honduras445 Completely agreed with you, also in 2016 Meltzer claimed 93,730. Meltzer is always anti WWE, and now suddenly in 2023 after All In (2023) he claims 80,709 and all this on twitter rather than actual publication, literally the only source used (and rightfully challenged by Raj Giri another prominent wrestling Journal;ist): https://twitter.com/davemeltzerWON/status/1678456928031350784 look at his retweet "You had mentioned after WrestleMania 32 that the real attendance was 97K+. What led to the big discrepancy with the later 80K number? I'm not being a smartass, I'm legitimately curious twitter.com/davemeltzerWON…" ]. The claim of 80,709 is based on a single police station report but there is no link to that but figures of 93,730 and 101,763. There wasn't a proper consensus even in project page, and here we should do a new consensus. It seems 4 people in favor of the upper limit than 2 so far. And Twitter can't be used as a legitimate source. Why did Meltzer suddenly change the number again after All In 2023? To make it look as if All In had more attendance. But I stand by more well sourced comments and we can't use Twitter as a source, get a better source for 80,000 figure. Since you like WON so much, lets use the more well sourced WP:RS 93,730 rather than using a tweet as a source! And take into account new consensus here. Dilbaggg ( talk) 04:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WrestleMania 32 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
The result of the discussion was: Not redirected due to no renewed discussion and stalled consensus. TheTMOBGaming2 ( talk) 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
I am formally proposing that this article redirect to WrestleMania#Future until there is officially some build for the event, which means until the Royal Rumble (2016) is done. There seems to be no sourced information that is not currently duplicated at WrestleMania#Future. The official "background" disclaimer for professional wrestling in all PPV articles doesn't count. Pragmatically, this article is a magnet for disruption from IPs and redlinks. Alternatively, we could request to semi-protect the article until February 2016, but some disruption might still slip through. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC) ping @ LM2000: @ TheMeaningOfBlah: @ CRRaysHead90: @ RadioKAOS: @ InedibleHulk:
Where did it come from? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Those unsourced statements in the lede in citations. Same goes for WrestleMania 31. They are WP:OR Could someone better explain to User talk:TheMeaningOfBlah#Manual notification? starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 03:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
My request for page protection went through, this should filter out most of the people who want to dump their speculation until December. My hope for a redirect still stands though. LM2000 ( talk) 04:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
rumoured matches 86.163.235.212 ( talk) 16:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I have found a higher quality PNG of the WrestleMania logo, this one is sized at 1,482 x 529 pixels (The one currently being used on the page is 500 x 200). I found this on the Pro Wrestling Wikia: http://prowrestling.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wrestlemania_32_logo.png The direct link to the full resolution logo is here: http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/prowrestling/images/b/b0/Wrestlemania_32_logo.png/revision/latest?cb=20150123211002
I can't edit the file, but maybe someone else can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby165324 ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry if this is formatted incorrectly, I don't really edit Wikipedia.
Just wanted to point out that the graphic on the right says that WM32 takes place on March 4th 2016 when the correct date is April 3rd.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Category:Professional wrestling in Texas 59.101.98.130 ( talk) 04:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
I just want to point out that the projected match card still says the there will be a one on one match for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. Since the Royal Rumble has been modified, there's a chance that the Wrestlemania 32 main event might be a bit different, anyone agree? 147.69.38.96 ( talk) 05:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC) You said The Undertaker would be barred from competing at wrestlemania again. Did you mean banned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch ( talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Is there some space to talk about this topic?
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the theme song which is not supported by a reliable source. 198.108.244.195 ( talk) 13:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I hereby move this to talk. Apart from maybe the date when tickets went on sale this whole package seems unencyclopedic trivia:
Travel packages and individual tickets went on sale on November 6, 2015, with the Gold Circle VIP Packages available for $2,360, and individual tickets ranging from $18 to $1,180. The Gold Circle Packages include seating at ringside, a "VIP Stadium entrance" and a "take-home" folding chair.< ref name=32Tickets> "WrestleMania 32 tickets on sale now". WWE. Retrieved 25 November 2015.</ ref>
Str1977 (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
As far as I know, there has been no confirmation of a singles match for the Divas Title, let alone one featuring either Becky Lynch or Sasha Banks, beyond Charlotte saying so in a promo. For all we know, there could be a Triple Threat or Fatal Four-Way match for the title at the event that's still almost six weeks away. Isn't it premature to list otherwise on this page? Skudrafan1 ( talk) 17:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Charlotte will have a match at Mania. That is confirmed. The opponent is not, which is why the table would say "Charlotte (c) vs. TBD". This shows that the match is confirmed, but the opponent(s) is not. It's not rocket science. -- JDC808 ♫ 17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The type of match between Dean Ambrose and Brock Lesnar is wrong, its a No Holds Barred Street Fight match, according to the official match cards shown in Youtube and other sites
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFbqaHUx0WM Nathalex1 ( talk) 23:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add match: Charlotte Vs. Sasha Banks or Becky Lynch - Divas Championship Geekhunter33 ( talk) 09:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Dose any one know the poster Victor2C ( talk) 21:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The poster should also show other wrestlemania participants Abdurrahmanchamp ( talk) 18:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
The Rock has confirmed he will appear at Wrestlemania, in the description, why does it not say that The Rock will be appearing at the event, WWE.com and The Rock's twitter account have both confirmed it, could you please add in the description that The Rock has confirmed that he will be at the event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.127.41 ( talk) 03:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the new participants for the Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal to be officially listed. Bo Dallas, Curtis Axel, Heath Slater and Adam Rose have been officially announced as entrants in the match tonight on an episode of SmackDown.
source: [1] KO Asylum ( talk) 07:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Per Wrestling Observer, The Battle Royal is now on the Main Card. Link: http://www.f4wonline.com/wwe-news/full-wrestlemania-card-plus-tv-network-and-ppv-schedule-210166 Quoting article for those who cant get through the paywall:
"WWE has officially updated the plans for Sunday's WrestleMania regarding where the different matches will air on the show.
As of right now, and this could change during the week, the Kalisto vs. Ryback U.S. title match will take place at about 4:30 p.m. Central time, 5:30 p.m. Eastern, and will be a WWE Network exclusive.
The USA Network and WWE Network one hour simulcast from 5-6 p.m. local time and 6-7 p.m. Eastern time, which will also air at WWE.com, the WWE app, and YouTube, will have the women's ten person tag team match and the Usos vs. Dudleys match.
The 20 man Andre the Giant Battle Royal will now be on the WrestleMania PPV card." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.42.51 ( talk) 05:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Someone added the claim that the New Day vs. LON match is a handicap match for the titles. However, the only source used thus far says nothing about handicap matches nor does it explicitely speak of a title match. We need sources for this. Str1977 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Str1977 (talk): source - [2] KO Asylum (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Str1977 (talk): Can you or someone include the link into the article because i'm unable to do it at the moment. Everything points to it being a 4-on-3 handicap match. At Roadblock, they made sure to state it was 2 vs. 2 when citing Sheamus and Barrett of LON vs. Big E and Kofi of New Day. source: [3] KO Asylum (talk) 03:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Here's a link that proves the tag team titles will be defended. Here's the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Chris Jericho Vs. AJ Styles 2601:240:4300:10D4:B422:87FB:BD80:77F0 ( talk) 01:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
the most important matches should go on top, followed by secondary main events like the cell match, followed by the other title matches (order: intercontinental, tag team, US and women's or the last two can be switched), followed by the remaining matches, with the pre-show matches lised at the bottom as they're the least important. reading this, you see the first match and think that's the main event match. it's not.
think of it like this - back when you used to buy wrestling videos and dvds, the list of matches at the back, the matches shown at the top of the list is most important, with lesser important matches going further down. it makes sense.
also for notes, make them short and concise. use * and footnotes if it's long and complex, so that the resulting table looks neater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.226.199 ( talk) 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
There's been some back and forth editing over what the "official" poster of the event is. There are two images in question:
1 is here - /info/en/?search=WrestleMania_32#/media/File:WrestleMania_32_poster.jpg
If you check out Stephanie McMahon's Instagram account here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BCiHW2YhEb_/?taken-by=stephaniemcmahon&hl=en, you can see a picture she posted of the real poster hanging on a wall. It is the 1st image I linked. That 1st image has also been shown hanging on the wall in the office during Raw the last few weeks.
There are some people removing that 1st image off the Mania 32 Wiki page and replacing it with the 2nd image. The 2nd image is a photoshopped picture of an image that is used when you sign up for WWE Network, which you can see here: http://www.wwe.com/wwenetwork. The 2nd image is not a poster. It is a fan manipulated image where they added the WrestleMania logo and and the date and other text to make it look like an official poster. Nowhere on WWE.com is the 2nd image I linked shown as an actual poster with text over it. It's a photoshop. A very well done photoshop, but a photoshop nonetheless. Until someone can can prove otherwise, keep the 1st image as the official poster on this Wiki page. OldSkool01 ( talk) 17:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Daniel Bryan retired because of brain damage from too many concussions in his career. Not from his neck injury. Joshua ariel 97 ( talk) 16:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
82.170.115.123 ( talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the match between triple h and roman reigns from for the wwe world heavyweight championship(x) to no disqualification for the wwe world heavyweight championship(y) here is the source with picture http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/691887-wrestlemania-32-main-event-match-possibly-getting-an-added-stipulation 82.170.115.123 ( talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Not done: Event is currently airing, matter is probably already settled or will be shortly. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 01:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I hereby move the following over here:
In a rare event for WrestleMania main eventers, it was theorized that WWE scripted Reigns not to speak on the last Raw before WrestleMania 32 to avoid him being booed, in a repeat of the Raw before WrestleMania 31 (which Reigns headlined). [1] [2]
Not only is this extreemly strangely worded - it is also not actually included in the source attached which merely said:
Instead of getting a chance to state what this match means to him, Reigns said nothing at all Monday night in Brooklyn. He didn’t have to say much, but something would have sufficed. Instead, it felt like WWE was sort of afraid to put him in front of a hostile crowd for fear of him being booed during his promo. If that was the case, WWE had good reason to feel that way because despite beating up Triple H on multiple occasions and closing the show by doing a cool dive over the top rope, the fans still jeered him.
There is nothing in there about anyone "theorizing" or WWE "scripting". There is also nothing about last years pre-Mania Raw, which makes the inclusion of a RAW report from 2015 all the more pointless. So it's best to put the whole thing away. Str1977 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
References
Can we please list the date? I tuned in at 7pm because usually it's 7-8 preshow 8-11 main show but accoding to results, the 3 pre-show matches all completed? Can someone list a reference to support these? When did this happen? When does the main show happen? Ranze ( talk) 23:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
As far as the end time goes, this WAS in fact the first WWE ppv that went past its scheduled end time. An edit was made stating that WMXX also went over, but that is not true as WMXX was advertised as a 5 hour show that was scheduled through 12am est. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.59.98 ( talk) 15:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
It was a six man tag not a handicap match
The vandalism is insane.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
220.244.228.72 ( talk) 01:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Roman Reigns defeated Triple H by disqualifaction in 28:37 minutes 2.50.150.106 ( talk) 02:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Can we fix the elimination thing.
Why is this not listed under results? WWE acknowledged that this match set a record for the shortest match in WWE Wrestlemania history and that the Rock set a new record.
Why is John Cena even mentioned in the results. No hate to him but he wasn't even with The Rock during those six seconds he faced Erick Rowan. 98.19.214.13 ( talk) 14:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
In the results table, Charlotte should not have a (c) next to her name since she was not the defending Women's Champion. She was the Divas Champion, but the Divas Title was not on the line. The match was to decide who would be the new Women's Champion and when the match was over Lilian announced Charlotte as the NEW Women's Champion. Essentially it was a match for a vacant championship where all 3 women in the match were challengers. Charlotte's Divas Title was not on the line so her having a (c) next to her name doesn't make any sense. This shouldn't be that complicated of an issue, but some people keep editing back in the (c). Hopefully this clearly explains it. OldSkool01 ( talk) 06:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Under the circumstances I can live without a "c" qualifier for Charlotte as long as the footnote remains as it now is: "Charlotte entered the match as Divas Champion, but was crowned WWE Women's Champion at the conclusion of the match." Is that acceptable to you? Str1977 (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Would anyone be interested in reporting on delays on fans not able to enter the stadium or reach their seats?
http://www.pwinsider.com/article/101077/getting-into-att-stadium-is-a-long-tedious-process.html?p=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.5.252 ( talk) 01:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Just like the Pontiac Silverdome that hosted WrestleMania III, why is the attendance of over 101,000 at WrestleMania 32 disputed. Also, where did you get the source that it's disputed? 98.18.59.229 ( talk) 03:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
I removed the following content from this article "WrestleMania 32 consisted of professional wrestling matches that involved wrestlers from pre-existing scripted feuds or storylines that played out on WWE television. Wrestlers portrayed heroes or villains as they followed a series of events that built tension and culminated in a wrestling match or series of matches" because of the following reasons.
1. It's merely stating something that every single reader over the age of 5, would be blatantly aware of. 2. The wording is awful, it sounds like some badly scripted warning on a TV show. 3. It is covered in a lot of detail on the Professional wrestling article, which is linked directly before previous location of the offending content.
If anyone can explain why they think it actually adds to the quality of the article, please explain here. Thanks Spacecowboy420 ( talk) 06:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
@
Spacecowboy420:I agree with the removal of the content in question, this is well known information to people around the world on how pro wrestling works and is not needed in this article. There is no point to it.
Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (
talk)
10:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I've fully protected the article for three days. @ WarMachineWildThing and Danratedrko: Edit summaries are not a substitute for talk page discussion. Danratedrko, I came close to blocking you as you haven't seemed to learned from your last block for personal attacks. Please tone down your rhetoric and discuss content issues here. -- NeilN talk to me 03:42, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Noted Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ( talk) 04:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Starship.paint: I think someone got them reverted before the lock down. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ( talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Article referenced to dispute the attendance contains opinion saying WWE had to announce over 100,000 and does not describe how Mr. Meltzer came up with the lower figure. Slumpercat ( talk) 07:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect WrestleMania XXXVI. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 21#WrestleMania XXXVI until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
@ Kakarott: I'm starting this thread for you to discuss why you're inserting fabricated numbers. Please keep discussion here rather than reverting. — Czello ( music) 07:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Heyyo456 ( talk) 03:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
just don’t go into edit war for more than 3 times in the last 24 hoursThis sounds like an invitation for WP:GAMING. — Czello ( music) 08:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This discussion has been borrowed from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling
Copy and pasted thread
|
---|
|
I'm not too familiar with this discussion, but it's clear that there is a dispute. Wikipedia's job is simply to reflect what is written in reliable sources, hence the full range of attendances needs to be mentioned in the infobox with a note that it is disputed. It is not Wikipedia's job to decide which attendance is correct. Hashim-afc ( talk) 16:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Honduras445 Completely agreed with you, also in 2016 Meltzer claimed 93,730. Meltzer is always anti WWE, and now suddenly in 2023 after All In (2023) he claims 80,709 and all this on twitter rather than actual publication, literally the only source used (and rightfully challenged by Raj Giri another prominent wrestling Journal;ist): https://twitter.com/davemeltzerWON/status/1678456928031350784 look at his retweet "You had mentioned after WrestleMania 32 that the real attendance was 97K+. What led to the big discrepancy with the later 80K number? I'm not being a smartass, I'm legitimately curious twitter.com/davemeltzerWON…" ]. The claim of 80,709 is based on a single police station report but there is no link to that but figures of 93,730 and 101,763. There wasn't a proper consensus even in project page, and here we should do a new consensus. It seems 4 people in favor of the upper limit than 2 so far. And Twitter can't be used as a legitimate source. Why did Meltzer suddenly change the number again after All In 2023? To make it look as if All In had more attendance. But I stand by more well sourced comments and we can't use Twitter as a source, get a better source for 80,000 figure. Since you like WON so much, lets use the more well sourced WP:RS 93,730 rather than using a tweet as a source! And take into account new consensus here. Dilbaggg ( talk) 04:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)