This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William S. Clark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | William S. Clark has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: 74.38.2.160 ( talk) 19:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC) The article is really good. The sources and links all match up. The article is very readable and noteworthy with historical signifigance. My only suggestions are to expand the silver mine controversy, if sources are available. Also, there is speculation that poet Emily Dickinson and William Smith Clark had a relationship. One source states "I propose that Emily Dickinson's Master, the mysterious person she loved when she was about thirty, and for whom she wrote hundreds of poems and the three Master Letters, was William Smith Clark..." [1] Maybe it is all speculation, but worth looking into. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 19:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}
Clark was President, Bothwell was Secretary, and Schuyler Van Rennselaer was the Treasurer. [2] Apparently, it is not very clear why the company financially collapsed. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 20:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}
William S. Clark meets wikipedia standards for good article status. There are no edit wars, the sources are valid, and the article is presented in a neutral point of view. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)}
While it would be wonderful if we could use the several images of statues of Clark in this article, my understanding is that there are licensing issues with photos of works of art. See the discussion of this in the peer review for this article here. Historical Perspective ( talk) 01:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on William S. Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
William S. Clark article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | William S. Clark has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: 74.38.2.160 ( talk) 19:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC) The article is really good. The sources and links all match up. The article is very readable and noteworthy with historical signifigance. My only suggestions are to expand the silver mine controversy, if sources are available. Also, there is speculation that poet Emily Dickinson and William Smith Clark had a relationship. One source states "I propose that Emily Dickinson's Master, the mysterious person she loved when she was about thirty, and for whom she wrote hundreds of poems and the three Master Letters, was William Smith Clark..." [1] Maybe it is all speculation, but worth looking into. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 19:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}
Clark was President, Bothwell was Secretary, and Schuyler Van Rennselaer was the Treasurer. [2] Apparently, it is not very clear why the company financially collapsed. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 20:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)}
William S. Clark meets wikipedia standards for good article status. There are no edit wars, the sources are valid, and the article is presented in a neutral point of view. { Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)}
While it would be wonderful if we could use the several images of statues of Clark in this article, my understanding is that there are licensing issues with photos of works of art. See the discussion of this in the peer review for this article here. Historical Perspective ( talk) 01:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on William S. Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)