From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Witness testimony that the individual's penis was erect

This seemed like an absolutely glaring omission from the article - multiple witnesses testified that the individual in question displayed a visible erection for "30 to 60 minutes" before the complaint was made. Although this has obviously been disputed by their attorney in court, media reports cited that testimony as being the main reason given by the judge why the indecent exposure case could proceed, so it's hard to argue that it isn't critically important. HistoryFightFan ( talk) 08:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Witness testimony that the individual's penis was erect

This seemed like an absolutely glaring omission from the article - multiple witnesses testified that the individual in question displayed a visible erection for "30 to 60 minutes" before the complaint was made. Although this has obviously been disputed by their attorney in court, media reports cited that testimony as being the main reason given by the judge why the indecent exposure case could proceed, so it's hard to argue that it isn't critically important. HistoryFightFan ( talk) 08:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook