This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Canadian / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KrystleW.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Not really that much detail on this article - is it really worthy of Wikipedia? Doesn't IMDB do this sort of thing a lot better? Zaphod Beeblebrox 11:24, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Uhmmm, it's short, basic info... I guess add the IMDB link, though... (Possibly on a sort of general basis, concerning movies?

Just because something is short doesn't mean it shouldn't be on a Wikipedia. It should be on Wikipedia, but it just needs more information. Cbrown1023

Why was the infomation for the sequel deleted? I can't see how it's not relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Smithlol ( talk • contribs) 09:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Oleg Prudius did not play as the Ice Cream Guy, rather it was Taras Kostyuk. Seasrmar ( talk) 01:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

How can a song released in 2005 and 2006 (!) released as a single be used in a movie released in 2004? -- SW4ever ( talk) 17:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Wouldn't wou say White Chicks is a cult movie? The reception from critics was negative, but it still has a lot of admires if you just look at how people post about it on Tumblr. -- Matt723star ( talk) 20:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Why does the term racist keep being deleted from the updates on this racist movie? It's racist...- 2602:306:cd0e:7520:4d44:b47e:60cc:8e4e ( talk) 02:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia has a policy of not publishing the personal analyses of editors; instead Wikipedia uses reliable sources for information, and cites these.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC) reply