![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Per Wikipedia naming conventions, once you move this article to mainspace, it should be at the wedding industry (no capitalization of words, no "the" in the title). I am looking forward to seeing more expansion, you guys should also coordinate the editing, preferably on this talk page. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks to be developing nicely, you have a lot of good content. At this point, I have only two thing to point out: (1) you need to pay attention to hyperlinks - see WP:LINKING. (2) Blogs are not considered a reliable source of information, please try to find better sources - see WP:SPS. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. This article covers a range of aspects of weddings, however it also has quite a list of significant problems. It appears that this may have been prepared in the context of some type of assignment so, while I might have normally considered quickfailing this, I will try and outline the main issues and place the article on hold.
This summarises some key issues. I will drop in over coming days and see how things are developing. hamiltonstone ( talk) 04:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing some issues. The article has been appropriately renamed, and some language has been improved. However, the references are still poor, and poorly formatted, there is still content included not relevant to the subject, while there is still significant content missing that needs to be covered. The article is a long way from reaching GA status. Thank you for contributing to wikipedia. hamiltonstone ( talk) 05:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Per Wikipedia naming conventions, once you move this article to mainspace, it should be at the wedding industry (no capitalization of words, no "the" in the title). I am looking forward to seeing more expansion, you guys should also coordinate the editing, preferably on this talk page. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks to be developing nicely, you have a lot of good content. At this point, I have only two thing to point out: (1) you need to pay attention to hyperlinks - see WP:LINKING. (2) Blogs are not considered a reliable source of information, please try to find better sources - see WP:SPS. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. This article covers a range of aspects of weddings, however it also has quite a list of significant problems. It appears that this may have been prepared in the context of some type of assignment so, while I might have normally considered quickfailing this, I will try and outline the main issues and place the article on hold.
This summarises some key issues. I will drop in over coming days and see how things are developing. hamiltonstone ( talk) 04:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing some issues. The article has been appropriately renamed, and some language has been improved. However, the references are still poor, and poorly formatted, there is still content included not relevant to the subject, while there is still significant content missing that needs to be covered. The article is a long way from reaching GA status. Thank you for contributing to wikipedia. hamiltonstone ( talk) 05:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)