![]() | A fact from Warsaw Barbican appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
}
![]() | It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Interesting article! I do have one question though, should the term "Barbican" be capitalized? It appears both ways in the article and I'm not sure which is correct. For example, "...the Barbican was mostly destroyed, as were... cheaper to rebuild the barbican and the nearby city walls..." So which should it be? This should be standardized through the article. Dismas| (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Warsaw Barbican. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Warsaw Barbican appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
}
![]() | It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Interesting article! I do have one question though, should the term "Barbican" be capitalized? It appears both ways in the article and I'm not sure which is correct. For example, "...the Barbican was mostly destroyed, as were... cheaper to rebuild the barbican and the nearby city walls..." So which should it be? This should be standardized through the article. Dismas| (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Warsaw Barbican. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)