![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is it not mentioned in the article?
Also, the article mentions that "in 1610, he was deposed by his former adherents Princes Vorotynsky and Mstislavsky, and made a monk". If so, how could he pay homage to Sigismund III Vasa as a Russian Czar on 29 October 1611? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danvolodar ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
hmm..how one can die when he is already dead? ;_) (pls rephrase the last sentence..)
User:Ghirlandajo should justify his changes not me.-- Emax 08:00, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
User:Space Cadet wrote in the summary: I already discussed on your own Talk page. And without your ridiculing and patronizing. Just for the record what he wrote in my talk page:
That is not a meaningful reply. -- Gene s 10:24, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Gentlemen, I untied the Gordian knot for you by placing both of the rulers in the succession box and adding a {{disputed}} tag. I believe it should stay there until the matter is resolved here. Please, don't make me ask for protection of this page. Halibu tt 10:42, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Godunov to Nicholas II by Saul Zaklad
Okay, was Vasya IV the last Rurikid Tsar, or was it Feodor I? THe pages on the two Tsars and the Rurik dyanasty all conflict.-- ChadThomson 07:33, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Normally it's romanised as Vasily (my preference) or Vasiliy. Vasili is wrong. This needs admin intervention. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 22:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
According to the article False Dmitry I
...many of the noble families exiled by Godunov - such as the Shuiskys, Golitsins and Romanovs - were granted his [False Dmitry] grace and allowed to return back to Moscow
However this article mentions no such thing. Instead we have
...[Shuisky] went to Uglich to inquire into the cause of the death of the Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich... Shuisky reported that it was a case of suicide... On the death of Boris... Shuisky went back upon his own words in order to gain favour with the pretender False Dmitriy I
Suggesting that Shuisky remained loyal to Godunov until the later's death.
What is correct?
Top.Squark ( talk) 19:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Can someone add something about his wives and two daughters in the article?-- Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy ( talk) 05:55, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why is it not mentioned in the article?
Also, the article mentions that "in 1610, he was deposed by his former adherents Princes Vorotynsky and Mstislavsky, and made a monk". If so, how could he pay homage to Sigismund III Vasa as a Russian Czar on 29 October 1611? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danvolodar ( talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
hmm..how one can die when he is already dead? ;_) (pls rephrase the last sentence..)
User:Ghirlandajo should justify his changes not me.-- Emax 08:00, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
User:Space Cadet wrote in the summary: I already discussed on your own Talk page. And without your ridiculing and patronizing. Just for the record what he wrote in my talk page:
That is not a meaningful reply. -- Gene s 10:24, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Gentlemen, I untied the Gordian knot for you by placing both of the rulers in the succession box and adding a {{disputed}} tag. I believe it should stay there until the matter is resolved here. Please, don't make me ask for protection of this page. Halibu tt 10:42, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Godunov to Nicholas II by Saul Zaklad
Okay, was Vasya IV the last Rurikid Tsar, or was it Feodor I? THe pages on the two Tsars and the Rurik dyanasty all conflict.-- ChadThomson 07:33, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Normally it's romanised as Vasily (my preference) or Vasiliy. Vasili is wrong. This needs admin intervention. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 22:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
According to the article False Dmitry I
...many of the noble families exiled by Godunov - such as the Shuiskys, Golitsins and Romanovs - were granted his [False Dmitry] grace and allowed to return back to Moscow
However this article mentions no such thing. Instead we have
...[Shuisky] went to Uglich to inquire into the cause of the death of the Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich... Shuisky reported that it was a case of suicide... On the death of Boris... Shuisky went back upon his own words in order to gain favour with the pretender False Dmitriy I
Suggesting that Shuisky remained loyal to Godunov until the later's death.
What is correct?
Top.Squark ( talk) 19:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Can someone add something about his wives and two daughters in the article?-- Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy ( talk) 05:55, 15 June 2011 (UTC)