![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has been established? 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 21:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Third party sources are present if you haven't noticed. Also, don't be so witty. I hear that is against the wiki-robot Code of Conduct. 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 05:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I know what a reliable source looks like, oh grand master, no need to tell me. All Headline News looks fairly reliable to me. There is no reason to think otherwise. Editors should not make distinctions on their own, however. Please abide by WP:Verifiability when making the decision of whether or not a source is credible. Your opinion of the source doesn't matter, only the policies to which you are bound. 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 17:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
She was listed in one unreliable source. However, a fairly extensive cast list in the Washington Post does not lit her. I've removed her, failing reliable sourcing. - SummerPhD ( talk) 19:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
If you make an addition that is unsourced, it will be reverted. Anything added that does not cite a source will be undone. Additions unsourced that are, reverted will be. Ourcedunsay ditionsaday illway ebay evertedray. - SummerPhD ( talk) 22:48, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
______________ someone tagged this person as an actress in this movie and she's not alive ... shouldnt someone change this to the proper person?
Michelle Justine Lang (31 January 1975 in Vancouver, British Columbia – 30 December 2009 in Kandahar, Afghanistan) was an award-winning Calgary Herald reporter and the first Canadian journalist to die in the War in Afghanistan.[1}
thank you SUMMERPHD! i would have but i dont know how! 97.65.234.3 ( talk) 22:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)der!
The film's official site links to their official Facebook page. Under WP:SPS it would not be a source for anything controversial about the film (e.g. is the film any good). Cast is not controversial. IMDb, on the other hand, is generally accepted on WP for the cast of released films. It is only clearly authoritative for some writing credits as all of the rest of their content is user generated. - SummerPhD ( talk) 01:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Jacob does not become a werewolf. He is a Chihuahua. Shouldn’t this be stated instead of a werewolf? A. Z. Colvin • Talk 04:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Does it really need 7 sources to back up the claim it's based on Twilight? Seems extreme. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9...yep 7. -- Τασουλα (Shalom!) ( talk) 22:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Don't you think we should add a list of parodies from the film onto this article (including the ones from the unrated version?)? And now that I am on the subject of the unrated version, should we add a heading 3 section about the extended and unrated scenes? 68.114.142.130 ( talk) 21:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
I made a page for Jenn Proske, personally, the star of Vampires Suck. I think the page should be updated to add a link to her name so you can link to her personal page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adder888888 ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vampires Suck. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Not even one-third of the way through reading the "plot" section and I have found numerous usage of slang/casual language that require readers to understand their slang meaning in order to discern what this article is saying. I was thinking about slapping a cleanup template like an Extensive Rewrite or something similar onto this. What are your thoughts? Widgetdog ( talk) 06:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
In general, casual language should not be avoided or replaced by overly formal language, just for the sake of formality. Per Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles: "Formal tone means that the article should not be written using argot, slang, colloquialisms, doublespeak, legalese, or jargon that is unintelligible to an average reader". So a change in tone should ideally help readability.
If you find slang terms which are only known to people of a certain background, create ambiguity, or are uncivil and potentially offensive, then cleanup is recommended. Just try not to overdo it. Dimadick ( talk) 12:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vampires suck: New movie 2010. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 21:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Has been established? 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 21:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Third party sources are present if you haven't noticed. Also, don't be so witty. I hear that is against the wiki-robot Code of Conduct. 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 05:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I know what a reliable source looks like, oh grand master, no need to tell me. All Headline News looks fairly reliable to me. There is no reason to think otherwise. Editors should not make distinctions on their own, however. Please abide by WP:Verifiability when making the decision of whether or not a source is credible. Your opinion of the source doesn't matter, only the policies to which you are bound. 68.1.89.162 ( talk) 17:59, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
She was listed in one unreliable source. However, a fairly extensive cast list in the Washington Post does not lit her. I've removed her, failing reliable sourcing. - SummerPhD ( talk) 19:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
If you make an addition that is unsourced, it will be reverted. Anything added that does not cite a source will be undone. Additions unsourced that are, reverted will be. Ourcedunsay ditionsaday illway ebay evertedray. - SummerPhD ( talk) 22:48, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
______________ someone tagged this person as an actress in this movie and she's not alive ... shouldnt someone change this to the proper person?
Michelle Justine Lang (31 January 1975 in Vancouver, British Columbia – 30 December 2009 in Kandahar, Afghanistan) was an award-winning Calgary Herald reporter and the first Canadian journalist to die in the War in Afghanistan.[1}
thank you SUMMERPHD! i would have but i dont know how! 97.65.234.3 ( talk) 22:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)der!
The film's official site links to their official Facebook page. Under WP:SPS it would not be a source for anything controversial about the film (e.g. is the film any good). Cast is not controversial. IMDb, on the other hand, is generally accepted on WP for the cast of released films. It is only clearly authoritative for some writing credits as all of the rest of their content is user generated. - SummerPhD ( talk) 01:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Jacob does not become a werewolf. He is a Chihuahua. Shouldn’t this be stated instead of a werewolf? A. Z. Colvin • Talk 04:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Does it really need 7 sources to back up the claim it's based on Twilight? Seems extreme. 3,4,5,6,7,8,9...yep 7. -- Τασουλα (Shalom!) ( talk) 22:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Don't you think we should add a list of parodies from the film onto this article (including the ones from the unrated version?)? And now that I am on the subject of the unrated version, should we add a heading 3 section about the extended and unrated scenes? 68.114.142.130 ( talk) 21:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
I made a page for Jenn Proske, personally, the star of Vampires Suck. I think the page should be updated to add a link to her name so you can link to her personal page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adder888888 ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vampires Suck. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Not even one-third of the way through reading the "plot" section and I have found numerous usage of slang/casual language that require readers to understand their slang meaning in order to discern what this article is saying. I was thinking about slapping a cleanup template like an Extensive Rewrite or something similar onto this. What are your thoughts? Widgetdog ( talk) 06:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
In general, casual language should not be avoided or replaced by overly formal language, just for the sake of formality. Per Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles: "Formal tone means that the article should not be written using argot, slang, colloquialisms, doublespeak, legalese, or jargon that is unintelligible to an average reader". So a change in tone should ideally help readability.
If you find slang terms which are only known to people of a certain background, create ambiguity, or are uncivil and potentially offensive, then cleanup is recommended. Just try not to overdo it. Dimadick ( talk) 12:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vampires suck: New movie 2010. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 21:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)