![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of VSS Unity be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
In this article [1] from the SanFran Sentinel, it says that the first Virgin Galactic White Knight Two will be called " Spirit of Steve Fossett"... (also in CBS SanFran [2]) So that would mean that the spaceplane in this article is _still_ called " VSS Voyager", and not VSS Spirit of Steve Fossett. 70.55.86.160 ( talk) 14:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Spaceshiptwo final.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 05:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning that the VSS Enterprise and Voyager are likely references to Star Trek: Enterprise and Voyager?-- Faillord adam ( talk) 14:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bmoneyweek\.(?:co\.za|com|net)\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Now that photos have been released for SpaceShipTwo#2, can we use some of them? (hopefully they are license compatible with fair-use) -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 08:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- will it be? -- Itu ( talk) 16:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I recently noticed that both VSS Enterprise and the Space Shuttle orbiter are members of the category, Category:Glider_aircraft. Both vehicles, of course, have rocket engines on board that are used for part of their flight, and both require other components (carrier aircraft or fuel tank and solid rocket boosters) to actually begin flight. Yet they both end up flying as gliders as they land. Hence, I understood, their inclusion in this category. I looked back a few years (to 2015) and both were still in that category then, so it isn't a recent change; I am not sure who put them in this category, but that does not really matter. For consistency, I thought that VSS Unity should be in the same category by whatever inclusion criteria allow both VSS Enterprise and the Space Shuttle orbiter to be in the category. I understand from recent edits that Ahunt and MilborneOne may have a different perspective on this. Would anyone like to discuss whether the present subject, VSS Unity, should be in the Category:Glider_aircraft category? Thank you, Fanyavizuri ( talk) 19:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Since Unity has been displayed in public and tested in public, we should add some more photos if possible. -- 67.70.34.69 ( talk) 08:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of VSS Unity be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
In this article [1] from the SanFran Sentinel, it says that the first Virgin Galactic White Knight Two will be called " Spirit of Steve Fossett"... (also in CBS SanFran [2]) So that would mean that the spaceplane in this article is _still_ called " VSS Voyager", and not VSS Spirit of Steve Fossett. 70.55.86.160 ( talk) 14:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
The image Image:Spaceshiptwo final.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 05:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning that the VSS Enterprise and Voyager are likely references to Star Trek: Enterprise and Voyager?-- Faillord adam ( talk) 14:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\bmoneyweek\.(?:co\.za|com|net)\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Now that photos have been released for SpaceShipTwo#2, can we use some of them? (hopefully they are license compatible with fair-use) -- 67.70.35.44 ( talk) 08:19, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- will it be? -- Itu ( talk) 16:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I recently noticed that both VSS Enterprise and the Space Shuttle orbiter are members of the category, Category:Glider_aircraft. Both vehicles, of course, have rocket engines on board that are used for part of their flight, and both require other components (carrier aircraft or fuel tank and solid rocket boosters) to actually begin flight. Yet they both end up flying as gliders as they land. Hence, I understood, their inclusion in this category. I looked back a few years (to 2015) and both were still in that category then, so it isn't a recent change; I am not sure who put them in this category, but that does not really matter. For consistency, I thought that VSS Unity should be in the same category by whatever inclusion criteria allow both VSS Enterprise and the Space Shuttle orbiter to be in the category. I understand from recent edits that Ahunt and MilborneOne may have a different perspective on this. Would anyone like to discuss whether the present subject, VSS Unity, should be in the Category:Glider_aircraft category? Thank you, Fanyavizuri ( talk) 19:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Since Unity has been displayed in public and tested in public, we should add some more photos if possible. -- 67.70.34.69 ( talk) 08:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)