This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Barry has appeared in 3 episodes and should be added to this section. Caringtype1 ( talk) 17:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Can we get the name of the baby/babies that play Amy, so we can add her to the recurring character section? Caringtype1 ( talk) 22:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I have undone the undo committed by Caringtype1 against my previous edit. This user did not leave any explanation for the undo, nor did s/he post anything in talk. Meanwhile, my edit was properly sourced and relevant to the article/section in which it was placed.
Caringtype1, if you wish to explain your reasoning as to why you thought that entire edit should have been deleted, please post here and we'll discuss it. Do not simply undo a valid revision without providing an explanation in the edit comment or in talk. I will revert any further unilateral reversions to this section on your part. I would be happy to discuss your concerns, assuming you weren't just engaging in vandalism. Part of the problem with not leaving any explanation is that we have no way of knowing whether you had a legitimate concern, were simply vandalizing the article, or are even connected to the show somehow and trying to "sanitize" the article by removing any critical reviews that you think were too harsh.
Either way, if you want that section removed, post here and we'll discuss it as a community. Any further unilateral reversions on your part will be reversed. Sir kris ( talk) 21:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I probably should have left an edit summary, you are right about that. But I did it because to me, it looked like blatant vandalism. The edit included incorrect formatting, grammar, and un-encyclopedic. The only sources used came from blogs, and completely unreliable sources. Saying things were "panned by critics" is contradictory to the sources, not one of which is that negative. If you find reliable sources that backs your statements up, then it could be added back in an encyclopedic manner. But for right now your personal opinions/vendetta against the series are not welcome here. Caringtype1 ( talk) 21:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Barry has appeared in 3 episodes and should be added to this section. Caringtype1 ( talk) 17:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Can we get the name of the baby/babies that play Amy, so we can add her to the recurring character section? Caringtype1 ( talk) 22:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I have undone the undo committed by Caringtype1 against my previous edit. This user did not leave any explanation for the undo, nor did s/he post anything in talk. Meanwhile, my edit was properly sourced and relevant to the article/section in which it was placed.
Caringtype1, if you wish to explain your reasoning as to why you thought that entire edit should have been deleted, please post here and we'll discuss it. Do not simply undo a valid revision without providing an explanation in the edit comment or in talk. I will revert any further unilateral reversions to this section on your part. I would be happy to discuss your concerns, assuming you weren't just engaging in vandalism. Part of the problem with not leaving any explanation is that we have no way of knowing whether you had a legitimate concern, were simply vandalizing the article, or are even connected to the show somehow and trying to "sanitize" the article by removing any critical reviews that you think were too harsh.
Either way, if you want that section removed, post here and we'll discuss it as a community. Any further unilateral reversions on your part will be reversed. Sir kris ( talk) 21:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I probably should have left an edit summary, you are right about that. But I did it because to me, it looked like blatant vandalism. The edit included incorrect formatting, grammar, and un-encyclopedic. The only sources used came from blogs, and completely unreliable sources. Saying things were "panned by critics" is contradictory to the sources, not one of which is that negative. If you find reliable sources that backs your statements up, then it could be added back in an encyclopedic manner. But for right now your personal opinions/vendetta against the series are not welcome here. Caringtype1 ( talk) 21:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)