This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Matrix Resurrections article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
On 25 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Matrix: Resurrections to The Matrix Resurrections. The result of the discussion was moved. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
This article reads like it was written by an intern who works at Warner Brothers. It must be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:6F01:9480:58F5:D372:2440:BC86 ( talk) 04:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Reviews are mostly positive now but section only quotes negative reviews 124.170.173.105 ( talk) 20:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I've reverted this change some three times already. That's not what happens. Neo doesn't "offer to release Trinity". He goes to the Analyst demanding that he release Trinity, threatening to have the Mnemosyne's crew kill him (read Neo) if the Analyst doesn't comply. -- uKER ( talk) 08:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
UKER, thanks for your help to continually improve the plot summary. I made a few more changes to build upon your recent edits. Some phrasing was restored, but others were influenced by the ones you made. Since you're the other active editor paying attention to this section, thought I'd bring that to your attention. If you have any issues with the most recent iteration, figured we could hammer it out here. Glad to see this section has made a lot of progress! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
And just to elaborate a bit, I added a few details about Io, while at the same time tightened up the rest of the summary. The word count has actually dropped from 640 to 636 despite the addition. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
For some reason, Imback.0000 claimed that the poster is an "official promotional theatrical release poster", despite the fact that the film was not only released in theaters but it also released in HBO Max as well. When the good editors replaced it with "Release poster", Imback.0000 became mad and not only edited back to "his own truth" but he even called everyone who removed his edits a Nazi as well as added nonsense facts. We need to stop his madness by banning him for good. 94-kun ( talk) 11:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Good! At least we stop his madness. 94-kun ( talk) 12:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Please update nominations table to include BAFTA nomination for Visual Effects. Thank You-- MKL123 ( talk) 20:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request adding citations to several thoughtful reviews in the Critical Response section, end of 2nd paragraph and reference 127.
Elie Mystal in his commentary in Washington Post wrote “Resurrections” succeeds as a philosophical reflection on our present moment and “captures the real crisis of our post-truth era”. [1] IndieWire rated the movie as A- calling it “The Boldest and Most Personal Franchise Sequel Since ‘The Last Jedi”. They write “At a time when Hollywood blockbusters can only seem to be about themselves, Lana Wachowski subverts that trend in extraordinary ways”. [2] Wallaroo04 ( talk) 00:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. This has been open for a few days with no traction, and the section is already over 600 words. There's no need to include additional quotes from critics.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
19:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Are we just going to ignore the satirical, extradiegetic criticism by the Merovingian? "Art, films, books were all better! Originality mattered! You gave us Face-Zucker-suck, and Cock-me-climatey-Wiki-piss-and-shit!" I think this needs commentary in the article. Viriditas ( talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Matrix Resurrections article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
On 25 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Matrix: Resurrections to The Matrix Resurrections. The result of the discussion was moved. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
This article reads like it was written by an intern who works at Warner Brothers. It must be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:6F01:9480:58F5:D372:2440:BC86 ( talk) 04:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Reviews are mostly positive now but section only quotes negative reviews 124.170.173.105 ( talk) 20:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I've reverted this change some three times already. That's not what happens. Neo doesn't "offer to release Trinity". He goes to the Analyst demanding that he release Trinity, threatening to have the Mnemosyne's crew kill him (read Neo) if the Analyst doesn't comply. -- uKER ( talk) 08:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
UKER, thanks for your help to continually improve the plot summary. I made a few more changes to build upon your recent edits. Some phrasing was restored, but others were influenced by the ones you made. Since you're the other active editor paying attention to this section, thought I'd bring that to your attention. If you have any issues with the most recent iteration, figured we could hammer it out here. Glad to see this section has made a lot of progress! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
And just to elaborate a bit, I added a few details about Io, while at the same time tightened up the rest of the summary. The word count has actually dropped from 640 to 636 despite the addition. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
For some reason, Imback.0000 claimed that the poster is an "official promotional theatrical release poster", despite the fact that the film was not only released in theaters but it also released in HBO Max as well. When the good editors replaced it with "Release poster", Imback.0000 became mad and not only edited back to "his own truth" but he even called everyone who removed his edits a Nazi as well as added nonsense facts. We need to stop his madness by banning him for good. 94-kun ( talk) 11:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Good! At least we stop his madness. 94-kun ( talk) 12:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Please update nominations table to include BAFTA nomination for Visual Effects. Thank You-- MKL123 ( talk) 20:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request adding citations to several thoughtful reviews in the Critical Response section, end of 2nd paragraph and reference 127.
Elie Mystal in his commentary in Washington Post wrote “Resurrections” succeeds as a philosophical reflection on our present moment and “captures the real crisis of our post-truth era”. [1] IndieWire rated the movie as A- calling it “The Boldest and Most Personal Franchise Sequel Since ‘The Last Jedi”. They write “At a time when Hollywood blockbusters can only seem to be about themselves, Lana Wachowski subverts that trend in extraordinary ways”. [2] Wallaroo04 ( talk) 00:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. This has been open for a few days with no traction, and the section is already over 600 words. There's no need to include additional quotes from critics.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
19:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Are we just going to ignore the satirical, extradiegetic criticism by the Merovingian? "Art, films, books were all better! Originality mattered! You gave us Face-Zucker-suck, and Cock-me-climatey-Wiki-piss-and-shit!" I think this needs commentary in the article. Viriditas ( talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)