While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of United States House of Representatives House Resolution 121 be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This was a joke wasn't it? I think it must have been. They wanted Japan to apologise AGAIN!
According to this Wikipedia article (and from a Korean point of view):- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_apology_statements_issued_by_Japan
Japan has apologized for the general war including in Korea 14 times.
Japan has apologized to Korea individually for its colonialism and the war 15 times.
Japan has apologized for the comfort woman situation in Asia (which includes Korea) 5 times.
Japan has apologized to Korea individually for Korean comfort women 4 times.
These apologies do not include the compensation paid to comfort women under the Korea-Japan 1965 treaty, that the South Korean government withheld from individuals and instead invested it in industry. A treaty which exempts Japan from any further payment obligations to South Korea.
It also does not include the setup of the Asian Women's Fund which included a personal signed apology to individual comfort women from the Japanese Prime Minister at the time (Murayama).
Can we have a section added, something like. "This resolution was obviously just an anti-Japanese statement as Japan had already paid compensation to the Korean confort women and had already apologised many times before including 4 explicet apologies to comfort women". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.136.152.14 ( talk) 09:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
STSC blanked Controversy section with an edit summary "per WP:OR - The Resolution was not just based on the memorandum by Larry Niksch". Ironically this edit summary admits the resolution is based on the Yoshida memoir. The original edit does not say "the resolution was soley based on the memoir" but "... memoirs were used as an evidence for ...". This is an undeniable fact and hardly WP:OR. STSC, it is against the policies to delete the sourced content just because it is an inconvenient fact for you. You will be blocked if you continue pushing POV.―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 21:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Aoidh, you claim that this article has been deleted because "assertions not supported by reliable sources". Please explain the rationale in detail. Your deletion without discussion violates wikipedia's deletion policy. Eyagi ( talk) 00:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source.- Aoidh ( talk) 01:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
In addition to citing Seiji Yoshida's book, there are some doubts as to the veracity of the memorandum and testimony upon which this resolution was based.What source says there are doubts? - Aoidh ( talk) 16:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of United States House of Representatives House Resolution 121 be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This was a joke wasn't it? I think it must have been. They wanted Japan to apologise AGAIN!
According to this Wikipedia article (and from a Korean point of view):- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_apology_statements_issued_by_Japan
Japan has apologized for the general war including in Korea 14 times.
Japan has apologized to Korea individually for its colonialism and the war 15 times.
Japan has apologized for the comfort woman situation in Asia (which includes Korea) 5 times.
Japan has apologized to Korea individually for Korean comfort women 4 times.
These apologies do not include the compensation paid to comfort women under the Korea-Japan 1965 treaty, that the South Korean government withheld from individuals and instead invested it in industry. A treaty which exempts Japan from any further payment obligations to South Korea.
It also does not include the setup of the Asian Women's Fund which included a personal signed apology to individual comfort women from the Japanese Prime Minister at the time (Murayama).
Can we have a section added, something like. "This resolution was obviously just an anti-Japanese statement as Japan had already paid compensation to the Korean confort women and had already apologised many times before including 4 explicet apologies to comfort women". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.136.152.14 ( talk) 09:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
STSC blanked Controversy section with an edit summary "per WP:OR - The Resolution was not just based on the memorandum by Larry Niksch". Ironically this edit summary admits the resolution is based on the Yoshida memoir. The original edit does not say "the resolution was soley based on the memoir" but "... memoirs were used as an evidence for ...". This is an undeniable fact and hardly WP:OR. STSC, it is against the policies to delete the sourced content just because it is an inconvenient fact for you. You will be blocked if you continue pushing POV.―― Phoenix7777 ( talk) 21:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Aoidh, you claim that this article has been deleted because "assertions not supported by reliable sources". Please explain the rationale in detail. Your deletion without discussion violates wikipedia's deletion policy. Eyagi ( talk) 00:43, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source.- Aoidh ( talk) 01:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
In addition to citing Seiji Yoshida's book, there are some doubts as to the veracity of the memorandum and testimony upon which this resolution was based.What source says there are doubts? - Aoidh ( talk) 16:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)