This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The subject is notable but the article contains too few details. As is should be trimmed and merged into Unilever. The other companies at the roots of Unilever have entries that are long enough. gidonb ( talk) 02:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Weak oppose. The subject is important as one of the two main companies which created Unilever. I agree that there are too few details in the article but, in my view, they should be built up and properly sourced. Dormskirk ( talk) 10:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

I have now done some trimming and cleaning up on the article. Dormskirk ( talk) 11:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose As Gidonb says, Margarine Unie is notable, and that is the main issue here. The best chance for someone to come along and do it justice is surely to leave it as it is. NB, there are articles is several other Wikipedias. Moonraker ( talk) 17:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This article was nominated for merging with Unilever Indonesia on 7 February 2020. The result of the discussion was to merge it and two other articles relating to overseas subsidies into this one.

I see that WP:PROD templates have been placed on Unilever Indonesia, Unilever Bangladesh Limited and Unilever Ghana. The articles should not be deleted (in particular the Indonesian company seems very notable) so I will remove the deletion proposals, but it might be a good idea to merge the content into a section of this article covering the various national subsidiaries. Phil Bridger ( talk) 13:07, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Fine with me. Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 13:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Fine with me, SOFTDELETE and redirect beats just delete. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unilever Nepal. -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

• Merge Bangladeshi subsidiary – I haven't examined the Indonesian or Ghanaian subsidiaries, and express no opinion about them, but there is insufficient coverage of the Bangladeshi subsidiary independent of the parent company to justify a stand-alone article. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
• Merge all. No added value to the country articles. gidonb ( talk) 21:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
• Merge. I was initially unsure as they appear to be associated companies not wholly-owned subsidiaries, but in spite of this I think they it is better to merge them here. Verbcatcher ( talk) 02:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
• Merge - If these articles were merged as sections or subsections of the main article it would be easy to separate them again later - should the need arise. So I suggest merging them, but not pulling them apart in the process. Chris Jefferies ( talk) 09:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
• Merge - None of them seem to be eligible for a standalone article at this point. The sourced material can be merged under appropriate subsections. Though, I would suggest merging Unilever Australasia into this articles as well, besides the ones that have already been mentioned above. Keivan.f ^Talk 06:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
• Support - The subsidiaries' articles are lacking, it would be better to perform this clean up. - Indefensible ( talk) 03:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
• Merge - Support merger of the subsidiaries. Thebiv19 ( talk) 08:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
• Merge - as per all arguments above. Ckfasdf ( talk) 04:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Unilever. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140402110549/http://unilever.com/sustainable-living/ourapproach/ourbusinessataglance/ to http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/ourapproach/ourbusinessataglance/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131215000103/http://www.achfood.com/overview.cfm to http://www.achfood.com/overview.cfm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617183750/http://www.unilever.com/ourcompany/newsandmedia/pressreleases/2007/sustainable-tea-sourcing.asp to http://www.unilever.com/ourcompany/newsandmedia/pressreleases/2007/sustainable-tea-sourcing.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)