Disambiguation | ||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Move this dis-ambiguation page to UFO (disambiguation) and then make UFO re-direct to Unidentified flying object?? Any objections please explain in detail. Georgia guy 01:14, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Anyone else think that there are way too many dead red links? Gold Stur 06:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
And thus the ToC supports hierarchical searches. Which are faster than linear ones.
--
Jerzy•
t 17:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
You say, "My brother in
Marfac saw a UFO."
Me: "Yeah, i know; headlights of cars that are climbing the mountain, shining onto the clouds."
You: "No, he saw a real UFO."
So, should i say
in response?
No way: i'm enuf of an ass to twit you (as above), once, for believing in flying saucers, but you, i, our guidelines, the English-speaking world, and uncounted others realize that "UFO" has been hijacked by the culture, and the
primary meaning of "UFO" is not same as the official meaning.
There is no doubt in my mind that
UFO should redirect to the article
flying saucer; that article also should therefore have a hatnote along the lines of
or
.
--
Jerzy•
t 02:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This diff establishes the origin of both of the widely separated entries
(in
UFO_(disambiguation)#Computer technology)
and
(in section Other musical works). (Explaining the separation would surely be beside the point.) And i'm adding an anchor that lets me make the re-unified entry useful.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jerzy (
talk •
contribs) 08:41, 19 July 2016
Disambiguation | ||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Move this dis-ambiguation page to UFO (disambiguation) and then make UFO re-direct to Unidentified flying object?? Any objections please explain in detail. Georgia guy 01:14, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Anyone else think that there are way too many dead red links? Gold Stur 06:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
And thus the ToC supports hierarchical searches. Which are faster than linear ones.
--
Jerzy•
t 17:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
You say, "My brother in
Marfac saw a UFO."
Me: "Yeah, i know; headlights of cars that are climbing the mountain, shining onto the clouds."
You: "No, he saw a real UFO."
So, should i say
in response?
No way: i'm enuf of an ass to twit you (as above), once, for believing in flying saucers, but you, i, our guidelines, the English-speaking world, and uncounted others realize that "UFO" has been hijacked by the culture, and the
primary meaning of "UFO" is not same as the official meaning.
There is no doubt in my mind that
UFO should redirect to the article
flying saucer; that article also should therefore have a hatnote along the lines of
or
.
--
Jerzy•
t 02:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This diff establishes the origin of both of the widely separated entries
(in
UFO_(disambiguation)#Computer technology)
and
(in section Other musical works). (Explaining the separation would surely be beside the point.) And i'm adding an anchor that lets me make the re-unified entry useful.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jerzy (
talk •
contribs) 08:41, 19 July 2016