-
Previous image on the article
-
Same image, but processed through Polar2Grid program
-
The image being complained by Super Typhoon Eden
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fukui Shimbun( https://www.fukuishimbun.co.jp/articles/-/953170) reports deaths being 35. There's 17 persons missing. 2001:999:41:5472:D898:3146:D129:E8F4 ( talk) 15:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
40 deaths Zoland Gamer ( talk) 21:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
An update: NHK NEWS( https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20191012/k10012125761000.html) reports deaths being 58, with 14 persons missing. 2001:999:40:6165:284F:9404:5EF4:D3C2 ( talk) 13:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Typhoon Hagibis (2019) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Early on 12 October, a tornado struck Ichihara City, which already killed one and left two people injured.[3]"
Can someone fix this sentence? I'm not sure what the "already" part is supposed to mean and Ichihara City is not mentioned in the reference. 93.136.41.55 ( talk) 11:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
The claim that Hagibis was the largest typhoon since Tip seems to be far-fetched and incredible. Please provide a reliable source to support such a claim. -- JavaHurricane ( talk) 01:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm sure you had seen this, but @ Super Typhoon Eden:is complaining that his/her version of Typhoon Hagibis is more defined and at better quality, while mine was processed through the Polar2Grid program, and should be at 375m resolution or less. @ Meow:'s image is also worth mentioning as it has broad coverage and is (maybe) much better than the two. Here is the images:
Please take action for this, considering the article a (maybe) potential competitor for the good article. - 👦 07:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
I propose that the death toll listed should be changed in light of information I collected from FDMA, stating that 118 were killed and 3 missing.
Whoever added the sentence claiming pinholes limit intensity is sorely mistaken. Pinholes are known to harold extreme changes in intensity and are often the catalyst for extreme deepening. If anyone wants to contest this, please reply below. -- AVeryWiseWolfy ( talk) 23:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fukui Shimbun( https://www.fukuishimbun.co.jp/articles/-/953170) reports deaths being 35. There's 17 persons missing. 2001:999:41:5472:D898:3146:D129:E8F4 ( talk) 15:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
40 deaths Zoland Gamer ( talk) 21:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
An update: NHK NEWS( https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20191012/k10012125761000.html) reports deaths being 58, with 14 persons missing. 2001:999:40:6165:284F:9404:5EF4:D3C2 ( talk) 13:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Typhoon Hagibis (2019) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Early on 12 October, a tornado struck Ichihara City, which already killed one and left two people injured.[3]"
Can someone fix this sentence? I'm not sure what the "already" part is supposed to mean and Ichihara City is not mentioned in the reference. 93.136.41.55 ( talk) 11:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
The claim that Hagibis was the largest typhoon since Tip seems to be far-fetched and incredible. Please provide a reliable source to support such a claim. -- JavaHurricane ( talk) 01:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm sure you had seen this, but @ Super Typhoon Eden:is complaining that his/her version of Typhoon Hagibis is more defined and at better quality, while mine was processed through the Polar2Grid program, and should be at 375m resolution or less. @ Meow:'s image is also worth mentioning as it has broad coverage and is (maybe) much better than the two. Here is the images:
Please take action for this, considering the article a (maybe) potential competitor for the good article. - 👦 07:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
I propose that the death toll listed should be changed in light of information I collected from FDMA, stating that 118 were killed and 3 missing.
Whoever added the sentence claiming pinholes limit intensity is sorely mistaken. Pinholes are known to harold extreme changes in intensity and are often the catalyst for extreme deepening. If anyone wants to contest this, please reply below. -- AVeryWiseWolfy ( talk) 23:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)