![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page can definitely be cleaned up and turned into more encyclopedic article-- it reads like an essay, especially with the Conclusions section, which is completely POV. Dan Cottrell ( talk) 03:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.234.75 ( talk) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Should this article and /info/en/?search=Two-Spirit be merged seeing as how they're basically talking about the same thing Scatach ( talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page can definitely be cleaned up and turned into more encyclopedic article-- it reads like an essay, especially with the Conclusions section, which is completely POV. Dan Cottrell ( talk) 03:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.234.75 ( talk) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Should this article and /info/en/?search=Two-Spirit be merged seeing as how they're basically talking about the same thing Scatach ( talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)