While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One week before the trial begins it is reported that "police are still investigating the case in full". [1] Is this unusual? Should it be mentioned in this article? __ meco ( talk) 18:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought "Islamist" referred to proponents of political Islam. Fjordman is clearly opposed to Islam in general. -- Tshloab ( talk) 09:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Breivik's salute wasn't a "nazi salute", that's just the ignorant media talking bullshit. He describes in the manifesto that he's invented it as a templar salute and that it is modelled on leftist salutes. -- 129.16.190.128 ( talk) 10:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Now it's changed as "righ wing salute". A closed fist salute (communist one) is now a right wing salute only because the media is keeping on this idiocy? Wikipedia, anyone here with a brain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.236.27.35 ( talk) 15:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded the English version of the indictment, if it should be of interest. - Laniala ( talk) 19:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The way things were changed, we now will have on the last day: "Fiftieth day" instead of day 50. Does anyone else think it should now be changed back to Day 1... Day 50? Eugene-elgato ( talk) 08:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe that the entire system with a section for every day needs to be reconsidered. By the time the trial is over, we will have 50 sections for each day if this continues, which is really quite excessive. Wikipedia is not a news service, and what was said on whay day is probably the kind of detail we should avoid. I think broader sections such as "Opening statements" and "Breivik's testimony" are more appropriate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
It would be informative if the article included the schedule for the trial. Belorn ( talk) 14:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
There is a schedule in Norwegian here. Njardarlogar ( talk) 08:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Did ABB waive confidentiality in regard to public statements made by the surgeon who performed ABB's nose operation? -- Vistamesa ( talk) 10:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
The BBC article from the 24th translates "forvaring" as 'preventive detention', whereas the official webpages of the Oslo District Court translates it as 'permanent detention'. Yet, at another place, it has also used 'preventive detention'. Which translation should be used? Njardarlogar ( talk) 17:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Is the begining of the sentence the arrest day july 25th 2011 or day of the end of trial august 24th 2012, meaning in theory will he have possibility to be free july 25th 2032 or august 24th 2033?-- RicHard-59 ( talk) 19:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
This article was originally created by a user who had been blocked from editing Wikipedia, and who was using a sockpuppet account to evade the block. Standard practice for articles created by means of block evasion is that the articles are to be deleted regardless of their merits (and with no prejudice against their being re-created by other users), unless the article has been substantially expanded by other users. Because this article has been substantially expanded by other users, it will not be deleted. DS ( talk) 13:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
" Lacoste, the French fashion label known by its green crocodile logo, is reported to have asked the authorities in Norway to prevent Anders Behring Breivik from wearing the brand.": [3]. His other big "big brand passion" was apparently Chanel's "Platinum Egoiste" cologne: [4]. Should these be mentioned somehow? Martinevans123 ( talk) 16:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
In case the following is of help to this wiki-article:
The psychologist who wrote the report (in 1983 or 1984) was forbidden by Behring, to give evidence at Breivik's trial (in 2012); Behring herself was excused from testifying (in 2012) on health grounds.
Sources:
https://www.tv2.no/a/8142855/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/9592433/Anders-Behring-Breiviks-mother-sexualised-him-when-he-was-four.html.
89.8.150.12 (
talk) 06:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One week before the trial begins it is reported that "police are still investigating the case in full". [1] Is this unusual? Should it be mentioned in this article? __ meco ( talk) 18:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought "Islamist" referred to proponents of political Islam. Fjordman is clearly opposed to Islam in general. -- Tshloab ( talk) 09:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Breivik's salute wasn't a "nazi salute", that's just the ignorant media talking bullshit. He describes in the manifesto that he's invented it as a templar salute and that it is modelled on leftist salutes. -- 129.16.190.128 ( talk) 10:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Now it's changed as "righ wing salute". A closed fist salute (communist one) is now a right wing salute only because the media is keeping on this idiocy? Wikipedia, anyone here with a brain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.236.27.35 ( talk) 15:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Uploaded the English version of the indictment, if it should be of interest. - Laniala ( talk) 19:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
The way things were changed, we now will have on the last day: "Fiftieth day" instead of day 50. Does anyone else think it should now be changed back to Day 1... Day 50? Eugene-elgato ( talk) 08:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I believe that the entire system with a section for every day needs to be reconsidered. By the time the trial is over, we will have 50 sections for each day if this continues, which is really quite excessive. Wikipedia is not a news service, and what was said on whay day is probably the kind of detail we should avoid. I think broader sections such as "Opening statements" and "Breivik's testimony" are more appropriate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
It would be informative if the article included the schedule for the trial. Belorn ( talk) 14:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
There is a schedule in Norwegian here. Njardarlogar ( talk) 08:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Did ABB waive confidentiality in regard to public statements made by the surgeon who performed ABB's nose operation? -- Vistamesa ( talk) 10:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
The BBC article from the 24th translates "forvaring" as 'preventive detention', whereas the official webpages of the Oslo District Court translates it as 'permanent detention'. Yet, at another place, it has also used 'preventive detention'. Which translation should be used? Njardarlogar ( talk) 17:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Is the begining of the sentence the arrest day july 25th 2011 or day of the end of trial august 24th 2012, meaning in theory will he have possibility to be free july 25th 2032 or august 24th 2033?-- RicHard-59 ( talk) 19:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
This article was originally created by a user who had been blocked from editing Wikipedia, and who was using a sockpuppet account to evade the block. Standard practice for articles created by means of block evasion is that the articles are to be deleted regardless of their merits (and with no prejudice against their being re-created by other users), unless the article has been substantially expanded by other users. Because this article has been substantially expanded by other users, it will not be deleted. DS ( talk) 13:50, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
" Lacoste, the French fashion label known by its green crocodile logo, is reported to have asked the authorities in Norway to prevent Anders Behring Breivik from wearing the brand.": [3]. His other big "big brand passion" was apparently Chanel's "Platinum Egoiste" cologne: [4]. Should these be mentioned somehow? Martinevans123 ( talk) 16:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
In case the following is of help to this wiki-article:
The psychologist who wrote the report (in 1983 or 1984) was forbidden by Behring, to give evidence at Breivik's trial (in 2012); Behring herself was excused from testifying (in 2012) on health grounds.
Sources:
https://www.tv2.no/a/8142855/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/9592433/Anders-Behring-Breiviks-mother-sexualised-him-when-he-was-four.html.
89.8.150.12 (
talk) 06:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)