This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water at the Reference desk. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2013. The result of the discussion was withdrawn. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
So, is that poster legitimate? Its source isn't stated and on all of the news sites that announced the film, it wasn't included. It looks pretty real, but I'm not sure... SergeantLuke ( talk) 20:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
After Paramount showed footage from the film yesterday at CinemaCon websites are reporting that in the live action scenes the characters are computer animated. Should we add this in the article? Koala15 ( talk) 19:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about what the film was titled in Russia and Italy. This sort of thing is a cruft magnet. There are hundreds of nations on Earth, and thousands of languages. When editors see their nation/language not represented, they start tacking onto the end of the list. This sort of content should be added only if there is a noteworthy reason to mention a nation's version of the title, for example if the title, if directly translated was offensive and had to be changed, etc., in which case we would provide sufficient context rather than a random list. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about the predictions for the North American opening weekend. This content seems to only have value in the hours leading up to the release. Once the film opens, speculation is irrelevant as data comes in. Since we are not a breaking news source, it makes more sense to start filling out the box office section once the data begins to come in. (Frankly I'd wait until the end of the weekend, but I know how eager some of you can get.) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
The article makes the following flimsy statement in the development section: "The film's title had been changed a few times, going over working titles such as The SpongeBob Squarepants Movie 2, and SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2". Firstly, there is virtually no difference between these titles. The only difference is that a Wikipedia editor made a typo with "Squarepants" ( see source) and we're missing "The". Does that indicate two unique working titles? No. Just because two different sources report slight variations does not mean that each variation is correct and worthy of inclusion. This source refers to the film as Spongebob Squarepants 2 (Note the lower-case "bob" and "pants")—are we to infer that Paramount was seriously entertaining a mis-capitalized version of the famous character's name? No we are not. Does this mean Spongebob Squarepants 2 was an official working title? No it does not, because it could just as easily reflect a trade publication editor's choice to truncate the title to save page space. Different does not always mean change. What makes sense to me is this: Let historians decide what the actual "working titles" were. It's lunacy to suppose that there was a pitch session where someone sent out a calendar appointment and the writers and execs got together and debated the inclusion of the word "The" in the working title, with one person feeling victorious and a few others upset that they didn't get their way. It is reasonable, however, to simply say "The movie was first announced as The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2 on (MM/DD/YY)" and leave it at that, which is what I intend to do. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I keep seeing this ending paragraph pop in and out of the article. Nobody ever explains why it's being added, nobody explains why it's being removed. Briefly, "Burger-Beard is stuck in the sand. Seagulls arrive. They sing the Spongebob theme. There is a rap battle." I'd like to figure out if it's actually part of the film, or just closing footage that we see after the movie's over. It sounds like the latter to me, but I haven't seen the movie. If it's not part of the main story, then we should probably cut it. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
At the moment, that para reads: "Meanwhile, Burger-Beard, who had been left on Bikini Atoll (the island above Bikini Bottom on the surface) by Plankton, is stuck in the sand with his head popping out. The seagulls arrive and Burger-Beard lets them sing the Spongebob theme song. As they are about to finish, Bubbles appears. He then argues with a seagull about how he doesn't like the song and the two engage in a rap battle. When the rap battle is finished, the seagulls continue to sing the song, ending the movie."
I would propose cutting it down to: "Meanwhile, Burger-Beard, still stuck in the sand at Bikini Atoll, re-encounters the seagulls. The gulls sing the Spongebob theme song, but are interrupted by Bubbles. They argue and this escalates into a rap battle."
This would explain how the film ends with regard to Burger-Beard, the gulls, and Bubbles. (It also ties in to the series' regular ending, plus it references the rap battles of the voice actors). I am aware I am not explaining myself very well, but this would keep the salient points intact, but trims down the waffle, taking the para from 86 words down to 34.
It may also be worth mentioning the post-credit scene, if only to spell out that the above takes place before the credits. Thoughts? TimothyJacobson ( talk) 22:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The movie is being released in Ireland in both English and Irish versions on March 27th. Dialogue has been dubbed by TG4, and it's the first time a Hollywood blockbuster has been given such treatment for Irish cinemas.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Culloty82 ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Culloty82 ( talk) 15:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Is there a connection or inspiration from Zappa? A Frank Zappa song, Excentrifugal Forz, is set in an underwater world with characters surnamed "Plankton" and "Tenticle". Coincidence, or inspiration?
I wasn't arguing about anything, I was just making the cast list a little better. FrozenFan2 ( talk) 18:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about the final scenes and post-credit content. I don't see how any of it is relevant to the actual story line, and our plot summaries are not intended to be substitutes for actually seeing the movie. In-depth plot content can be deemed derivative works, which would be a copyright violation. I think it best to stick to the plot highlights and omit seagull raps and post-credit whatevers. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Antonio Banderas appears to be the only actor listed in the poster's billing block.
[1]
[2] Per
Template:Infobox film, that would suggest his is the only name that should be in the |starring=
parameter. Thoughts? How did we decide that Tom Kenny, Clancy Brown, Rodger Bumpass, Bill Fagerbakke, Carolyn Lawrence, Mr. Lawrence, and Matt Berry should be included as "stars"?
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion, both spongebob movies are traditional animated movies with some live-action scenes but some other people say both or just Sponge out of water is an animation/live-action hybrid movie(s). Unlike hybrid movies, only minority of both movies are live-action. If spongebob movies are hybrid movies then The Lego Movie is definitely a hybrid movie too.
I had some discussion with 82.38.157.176 at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films#Spongebob_movies but it's going nowhere. Paleo cemoski 18:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
This anonymous user constantly changes the order of the cast and adds voice actors to the Infobox. [8] There is no edit summary given. One was a personal attack. [9] LPS and MLP Fan ( LittlestPetShop) ( MyLittlePony) 18:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA declaration: text in this section removed by me; I've left it here in case the removal breaks any references.
Prior to October 9, residents were given yellow flyers handed out by the production crew to detail the inconveniences of the filming would have on them. [1]
References
- ^ Natario, Nick (September 27, 2013). "Details about SpongeBob shoot announced". WJCL News. Savannah, GA. Archived from the original on October 21, 2013. Retrieved October 21, 2013.
Baffle☿gab 04:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob SquarePants II and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob SquarePants II until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob Squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob Squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob Squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob Squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The SpongeBob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The SpongeBob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Rodent (Spongebob) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Rodent (Spongebob) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Rodent (SpongeBob) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Rodent (SpongeBob) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sir Pinch-a-Lot and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Sir Pinch-a-Lot until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sour Note and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Sour Note until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mr. Superawesomeness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Mr. Superawesomeness until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Invincibubble and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Invincibubble until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water at the Reference desk. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2013. The result of the discussion was withdrawn. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
So, is that poster legitimate? Its source isn't stated and on all of the news sites that announced the film, it wasn't included. It looks pretty real, but I'm not sure... SergeantLuke ( talk) 20:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
After Paramount showed footage from the film yesterday at CinemaCon websites are reporting that in the live action scenes the characters are computer animated. Should we add this in the article? Koala15 ( talk) 19:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about what the film was titled in Russia and Italy. This sort of thing is a cruft magnet. There are hundreds of nations on Earth, and thousands of languages. When editors see their nation/language not represented, they start tacking onto the end of the list. This sort of content should be added only if there is a noteworthy reason to mention a nation's version of the title, for example if the title, if directly translated was offensive and had to be changed, etc., in which case we would provide sufficient context rather than a random list. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about the predictions for the North American opening weekend. This content seems to only have value in the hours leading up to the release. Once the film opens, speculation is irrelevant as data comes in. Since we are not a breaking news source, it makes more sense to start filling out the box office section once the data begins to come in. (Frankly I'd wait until the end of the weekend, but I know how eager some of you can get.) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
The article makes the following flimsy statement in the development section: "The film's title had been changed a few times, going over working titles such as The SpongeBob Squarepants Movie 2, and SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2". Firstly, there is virtually no difference between these titles. The only difference is that a Wikipedia editor made a typo with "Squarepants" ( see source) and we're missing "The". Does that indicate two unique working titles? No. Just because two different sources report slight variations does not mean that each variation is correct and worthy of inclusion. This source refers to the film as Spongebob Squarepants 2 (Note the lower-case "bob" and "pants")—are we to infer that Paramount was seriously entertaining a mis-capitalized version of the famous character's name? No we are not. Does this mean Spongebob Squarepants 2 was an official working title? No it does not, because it could just as easily reflect a trade publication editor's choice to truncate the title to save page space. Different does not always mean change. What makes sense to me is this: Let historians decide what the actual "working titles" were. It's lunacy to suppose that there was a pitch session where someone sent out a calendar appointment and the writers and execs got together and debated the inclusion of the word "The" in the working title, with one person feeling victorious and a few others upset that they didn't get their way. It is reasonable, however, to simply say "The movie was first announced as The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie 2 on (MM/DD/YY)" and leave it at that, which is what I intend to do. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I keep seeing this ending paragraph pop in and out of the article. Nobody ever explains why it's being added, nobody explains why it's being removed. Briefly, "Burger-Beard is stuck in the sand. Seagulls arrive. They sing the Spongebob theme. There is a rap battle." I'd like to figure out if it's actually part of the film, or just closing footage that we see after the movie's over. It sounds like the latter to me, but I haven't seen the movie. If it's not part of the main story, then we should probably cut it. Thoughts? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
At the moment, that para reads: "Meanwhile, Burger-Beard, who had been left on Bikini Atoll (the island above Bikini Bottom on the surface) by Plankton, is stuck in the sand with his head popping out. The seagulls arrive and Burger-Beard lets them sing the Spongebob theme song. As they are about to finish, Bubbles appears. He then argues with a seagull about how he doesn't like the song and the two engage in a rap battle. When the rap battle is finished, the seagulls continue to sing the song, ending the movie."
I would propose cutting it down to: "Meanwhile, Burger-Beard, still stuck in the sand at Bikini Atoll, re-encounters the seagulls. The gulls sing the Spongebob theme song, but are interrupted by Bubbles. They argue and this escalates into a rap battle."
This would explain how the film ends with regard to Burger-Beard, the gulls, and Bubbles. (It also ties in to the series' regular ending, plus it references the rap battles of the voice actors). I am aware I am not explaining myself very well, but this would keep the salient points intact, but trims down the waffle, taking the para from 86 words down to 34.
It may also be worth mentioning the post-credit scene, if only to spell out that the above takes place before the credits. Thoughts? TimothyJacobson ( talk) 22:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The movie is being released in Ireland in both English and Irish versions on March 27th. Dialogue has been dubbed by TG4, and it's the first time a Hollywood blockbuster has been given such treatment for Irish cinemas.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Culloty82 ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Culloty82 ( talk) 15:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Is there a connection or inspiration from Zappa? A Frank Zappa song, Excentrifugal Forz, is set in an underwater world with characters surnamed "Plankton" and "Tenticle". Coincidence, or inspiration?
I wasn't arguing about anything, I was just making the cast list a little better. FrozenFan2 ( talk) 18:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
In this edit I removed content about the final scenes and post-credit content. I don't see how any of it is relevant to the actual story line, and our plot summaries are not intended to be substitutes for actually seeing the movie. In-depth plot content can be deemed derivative works, which would be a copyright violation. I think it best to stick to the plot highlights and omit seagull raps and post-credit whatevers. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Antonio Banderas appears to be the only actor listed in the poster's billing block.
[1]
[2] Per
Template:Infobox film, that would suggest his is the only name that should be in the |starring=
parameter. Thoughts? How did we decide that Tom Kenny, Clancy Brown, Rodger Bumpass, Bill Fagerbakke, Carolyn Lawrence, Mr. Lawrence, and Matt Berry should be included as "stars"?
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion, both spongebob movies are traditional animated movies with some live-action scenes but some other people say both or just Sponge out of water is an animation/live-action hybrid movie(s). Unlike hybrid movies, only minority of both movies are live-action. If spongebob movies are hybrid movies then The Lego Movie is definitely a hybrid movie too.
I had some discussion with 82.38.157.176 at Talk:List of highest-grossing animated films#Spongebob_movies but it's going nowhere. Paleo cemoski 18:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
This anonymous user constantly changes the order of the cast and adds voice actors to the Infobox. [8] There is no edit summary given. One was a personal attack. [9] LPS and MLP Fan ( LittlestPetShop) ( MyLittlePony) 18:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA declaration: text in this section removed by me; I've left it here in case the removal breaks any references.
Prior to October 9, residents were given yellow flyers handed out by the production crew to detail the inconveniences of the filming would have on them. [1]
References
- ^ Natario, Nick (September 27, 2013). "Details about SpongeBob shoot announced". WJCL News. Savannah, GA. Archived from the original on October 21, 2013. Retrieved October 21, 2013.
Baffle☿gab 04:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob SquarePants II and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob SquarePants II until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob Squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob Squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob Squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob Squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob squarepants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob squarepants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The SpongeBob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The SpongeBob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spongebob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Spongebob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SpongeBob SquarePants 2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#SpongeBob SquarePants 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 00:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Rodent (Spongebob) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Rodent (Spongebob) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Rodent (SpongeBob) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Rodent (SpongeBob) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sir Pinch-a-Lot and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Sir Pinch-a-Lot until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sour Note and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Sour Note until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mr. Superawesomeness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Mr. Superawesomeness until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Invincibubble and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#The Invincibubble until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 12:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)