This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. This needs references or it should fail its next AfD. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I doubt the TV and DVD dates are so far appart...
If this was the fourth crossover, what was the third crossover?
Who agrees that it should be a series
Something like that should not be on a Wikipedia talk page. And sign your posts with four tides.
Internetcrazy 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Is the Jimmy/Timmy trilogy canon or is it a gimmick? 68.165.173.217 22:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
1) Shorten the summary section by a LOT.
2) Outright delete the Goofs and Trivia section. Lots42 20:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Was the result of this AfD really "keep"? It looks more like "no concensus", to me. I don't see how this is notable, and it's all original research. Why are such articles kept? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 11:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel. Brabbel!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.51.21 ( talk) 21:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
The goofs as it is make little sense. At the very least, it seems the goof applies to the -second- Power Hour movie. Lots42 ( talk)
The articles for numbers 2 and 3 were deleted for seemingly no reason, and now redirect to the page of the first one. Please fix this and make sure it doesn't happen again. 76.83.246.11 ( talk) 02:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. This needs references or it should fail its next AfD. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I doubt the TV and DVD dates are so far appart...
If this was the fourth crossover, what was the third crossover?
Who agrees that it should be a series
Something like that should not be on a Wikipedia talk page. And sign your posts with four tides.
Internetcrazy 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Is the Jimmy/Timmy trilogy canon or is it a gimmick? 68.165.173.217 22:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
1) Shorten the summary section by a LOT.
2) Outright delete the Goofs and Trivia section. Lots42 20:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Was the result of this AfD really "keep"? It looks more like "no concensus", to me. I don't see how this is notable, and it's all original research. Why are such articles kept? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 11:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel. Brabbel!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.51.21 ( talk) 21:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
The goofs as it is make little sense. At the very least, it seems the goof applies to the -second- Power Hour movie. Lots42 ( talk)
The articles for numbers 2 and 3 were deleted for seemingly no reason, and now redirect to the page of the first one. Please fix this and make sure it doesn't happen again. 76.83.246.11 ( talk) 02:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)