![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
* It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since October 2007. * It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since July 2008. * Its lead section requires expansion. Tagged since July 2008.
Can someone verify specifically what the issues are for this article? I've found some more citations, but what other areas of attention does it require? Cactusjump ( talk) 23:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Under "Production" "For years later the film was finished, requiring approximately 360,000 drawings,..." - That should be "Four years...", shouldn't it? PorcupineTiger ( talk) 08:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Another one: "(...) however the newer team backed Stevens, all except one Don Bluth, who delared Disney's work stale (...)"
I guess it should read "declared". -- 91.15.241.89 ( talk) 14:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Oliver.
Another one...in the last paragraph under "Plot" in the 4th line down it reads, "At home, Dinky and Bommer attempt to eat Squeeks the caterpillar..." The correct spelling is Boomer, not Bommer.
I removed the citation and cleanup templates, since my work on this article since April has (hopefully) made this article much better. Cheers! Cactusjump ( talk) 22:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
AnmaFinotera, can I add to The Fox and the Hound article a Characters section? This section is usually included in articles about Motion pictures ( The Lion King) and Anime ( Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust). I will write it myself. OckhamTheFox ( talk) 20:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Our presumably autistic pest in Mobile, Alabama hit this article yet again after the block lifted via an account with an insulting username. I have therefore placed it on permanent semi-protection so that legit users don't go banging their heads against the wall because of Bambifan101 and his Bottomless Sock Drawer. The little dweeb now has his own long-term abuse page, found here. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 00:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
What is exactly is wrong with stating that the characters from this film appeared is a handful of comics?-- Marktreut ( talk) 01:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
It has scans from the comics themselves. What more do you need? We're not getting anywhere with this. How about a short sentence in the opening paragraph like: "Comic strips based on the characters were also published."-- Marktreut ( talk) 15:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Any more of this of this and I'll start to question the evidence of Barack Obama being of African descent! I can imagine lawyers having an easier time convincing the Supreme Court of the constitutionality of their case than convincing you of facts that are plain for all to see. And all for what? A simple little harmless sentence that does no harm to anyone and just states facts! Somehow I don't think that this is about facts or the evidence. To misquote a French philosopher, it's more a case of certain people who have reached the point of "I argue therefore I am".-- Marktreut ( talk) 09:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
And an encyclopaedia is about providing information, not denying it.-- Marktreut ( talk) 17:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
One sentence on some comics that were released isn't enough to merit an entire section. However, most film articles contain a sub-section on marketing in the release section. If there's enough additional information on how the film was marketed we could create a new section and mention the comics in there. Ash Loomis ( talk) 00:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I totally understand that good references are needed for any information, however I have the impression of a double standard that is applied here because of the personality of the editor. Many films have a subsection "in other media" which are not always referenced as per Wikipedia's principles, however the fact that those other media obviously exist seems sufficient for being mentioned in WP. For this film, many comic adaptations do exist and were published in many books and countries, so a mention of that in WP would not be problematic IMO. But I think I can find a few references that talk about comics at least in the "Red Book". I'll take look and see if it does look sufficient. Lerichard ( talk) 15:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
"tough he priases the voice work" it should be "though he praises the voice work"
Tuccle22 ( talk) 19:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move these pages at this time. GTBacchus( talk) 16:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
As the novel is the primary work, came before the film, and is notable, I feel this article should be moved to the film disambig (yes, this was the way it was several years ago and I myself erroneously moved it here). If the move is approved, I propose a three fold process:
Thoughts?-- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC) -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I am afraid the logic behind this proposal is completely flawed. If the film is now the primary topic, it is irrelevant that the novel preceded it and provided the source. We recently had a very similar discussion about the primary meaning of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. PatGallacher ( talk) 22:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
I would add that a number of fairly well-known films are based on obscure novels which are not now widely read, so this is irrelevant to deciding which is the primary topic. PatGallacher ( talk) 08:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
See a recent move discussion for To Catch a Thief, where it was decided that the film is the primary meaning, not the novel it was based on. If the novel is out of print and has been for some time this casts serious doubt on whether it is the primary meaning. AnmaFinotera is shifting his ground, is he claiming that there is no primary meaning, and if so why? PatGallacher ( talk) 12:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Per my understanding, the first 23 Disney animated feature films will become public domain films in the 2032-2072 range. Extrapolation suggests that this film should be in the public domain in 2076, but the "95-year rule" is only for works copyrighted before 1978. How do you calculate this film's public domain year?? Georgia guy ( talk) 16:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
![]() | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
{{ edit semi-protected}}
The story of the film was written by:
Larry Clemmons
Ted Berman
David Michener
Peter Young
Burny Mattinson
Steve Hulett
Earl Kress
and Vance Gerry. Source:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082406/fullcredits. Also,
Peter Young points to a dab page.
64.134.25.177 ( talk) 14:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
In "Plot", it says, "She names him Tod (Keith Mitchell), "tod" being an old Scots word for fox." This is incorrect; in the film, she names him Tod because he's "such a little todler". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.159.114 ( talk) 01:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Not done:
The problem is that neither your statement nor the one that was in the article are verified by a reliable source. If she actually says one or the other in the movie, then we should add that one in. If either statement is just a supposition of people watching it, then that's original research, and doesn't belong in the article. I've gone ahead and removed the statement from the article, until such time as there is clarification.
Qwyrxian (
talk) 15:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} Hi, the plot is currently too long anyway, can someone please put back this edit as of 21 September 2010? 68.17.110.122 ( talk) 01:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
The current credit list in this article is absurdly long, listing seemingly everyone who had any connection with the film, including dozens of "uncredited" alleged animators. This is pointless trivia. Current Good Article The Iron Giant uses a much briefer format that I feel we should use here. I am suggesting we remove the "Animation by", "Layouts by" and "Backgrounds by" sections entirely. Comments? - SummerPhD ( talk) 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
What does Super RTL being owned by Walt Disney Productions have to do with The Fox and the Hound? 108.208.168.221 ( talk) 23:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think it's got JACK to do with it. Recommend deleting it. 98.90.4.147 ( talk) 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Design and animation", change this part: " With 17% of the animators now gone, production on he Fox and the Hound was delayed." The movie is not called "he Fox and the Hound, it's "The Fox and the Hound". 69.85.235.3 ( talk) 15:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article says Copper is named after the element of the same name, but this is not only not sourced, but probably incorrect. If anything, wasn't the Copper in the film named after the Copper from the 1967 novel by Daniel P. Mannix? Also, in this edit, the categories that were previously in the correct order got unordered, and one was removed. Can this be fixed? 69.85.217.198 ( talk) 22:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I don't think this should have Category:Animated fantasy films on it, it's not a fantasy film, it's a buddy movie. Could this be corrected? The last two categories also need to be alphabetized. 130.160.207.22 ( talk) 01:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to add a "credits" section for this page. May I?
74.104.151.204 ( talk) 21:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
It says "However, Chief catches Tod trying to escape on a railroad track and chases him, but is struck by an oncoming train and fatally wounded.", implying that chief died. This is wrong. Chief and Tod were on a railroad bridge when the train comes. Tod ducks under the train, and Chief jumps in the stream below, braking his leg. He is neither struck by the train nor fatally wounded.
201.82.25.188 ( talk) 12:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
"In the ensuing chase Copper catches Tod. Against better judgement, Copper decides to let Tod go and diverts Slade. Tod tries to escape on a railroad track, but is caught and pursued by Chief as a train suddenly passes by. Tod ducks under the train, but Chief is struck by the train and falls into the stream below, braking his leg. Angered by this, Copper and Slade blame Tod for the accident and vow vengeance."
I hope that satisfies you well enough. Kkjj ( talk) 11:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change braking to breaking 2601:982:8001:3700:D471:C9EB:F89D:9BEE ( talk) 10:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
When Tod tried to apologize to him, what made him think he was making up excuses. -- 75.172.110.80 ( talk) 00:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the plot section, change conversion to conversation. SlubJomones ( talk) 12:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Fox and the Hound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I think we should add that fans from the original story and critics were disappointed with story changes. -- Evope ( talk) 05:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal
http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Disney_Dark_Age — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evope ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to the Soundtrack section that the film's orchestral score by Buddy Baker was never released on any music media. Pmastrippolito ( talk) 01:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Fox and the Hound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
For the "Cast" section, I would like to propose that the actors for Tod and Copper be listed and displayed like this for simplification purposes:
This is just a simple proposal. If needed, please take a moment to review. -- Draco9904 ( talk), 4:54, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
"Tweed names him Tod, because he reminds her of a toddler." Is that stated in the book/film? "Tod" is an old word meaning "fox", nothing to do with toddlers. Equinox ◑ 01:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The bear is a he. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.120.78.184 ( talk) 09:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "be" from "Tweed, realizing Tod is no longer be safe with her, leaves him at a..." so that it sounds correct. Meowcenary ( talk) 15:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
166.181.81.229 ( talk) 23:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Please enable the editing.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: “A power struggle between the two directors and co-producer Ron Miller broke out between them over key sections of the film with Miller supporting the younger Stevens. Miller instructed Reitherman to surrender reins over the junior personnel, but Reitherman resisted due to a lack of trust in the young animators.“ To: A power struggle between the two directors and co-producer Ron Miller broke out over key sections of the film with Miller supporting the younger Stevens. Miller instructed Reitherman to surrender reins over to the junior personnel, but Reitherman resisted due to a lack of trust in the young animators. Gooseman188 ( talk) 10:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
This article only uses "Amos" rather than the surname "Slade". However, is that really encyclopedic? Yes, he is only referred to by the first name, but isn't being encyclopedic more important than whether or not it matches what the movie said? Slade only refers to Tweed as "Widow" or "woman", but "Widow" is not a real name. My point being, shouldn't this be changed or at least discussed first? I wonder if anyone even cares, considering the lack of recent edits from registered users. Many of the recent edits have been reverted as well. Perhaps this page should be protected like Lady and the Tramp was? 104.58.147.5 ( talk) 22:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm not sure it's necessary to include the category for "Drama animation" when this page already has "Animated drama films". Shouldn't the former category be removed? 75.106.171.139 ( talk) 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The bear is a male bear, and is a he, him, and his. He is a giant vicious savage bear, that should be added to the plot. 2A02:C7C:CB5B:8200:D58C:BFC4:D754:793A ( talk) 11:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
What's with that (horrendous) picture of an octogenarian Don Bluth? He was in his 40s at the time. It's a very large picture that doesn't illustrate anything relevant to the information given and it's only presenting the reader with the bad candid shot of an old man who looks like he's having a stroke. Kumagoro-42 ( talk) 14:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Please make the plot look more better by adding vicious disturbed savage between giant and bear. And rename the bear an it to him, his, and he, because he is a he in the 1981 film. 2A02:C7C:CB5B:8200:3902:BF88:74E5:6A67 ( talk) 19:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
* It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since October 2007. * It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since July 2008. * Its lead section requires expansion. Tagged since July 2008.
Can someone verify specifically what the issues are for this article? I've found some more citations, but what other areas of attention does it require? Cactusjump ( talk) 23:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Under "Production" "For years later the film was finished, requiring approximately 360,000 drawings,..." - That should be "Four years...", shouldn't it? PorcupineTiger ( talk) 08:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Another one: "(...) however the newer team backed Stevens, all except one Don Bluth, who delared Disney's work stale (...)"
I guess it should read "declared". -- 91.15.241.89 ( talk) 14:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Oliver.
Another one...in the last paragraph under "Plot" in the 4th line down it reads, "At home, Dinky and Bommer attempt to eat Squeeks the caterpillar..." The correct spelling is Boomer, not Bommer.
I removed the citation and cleanup templates, since my work on this article since April has (hopefully) made this article much better. Cheers! Cactusjump ( talk) 22:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
AnmaFinotera, can I add to The Fox and the Hound article a Characters section? This section is usually included in articles about Motion pictures ( The Lion King) and Anime ( Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust). I will write it myself. OckhamTheFox ( talk) 20:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Our presumably autistic pest in Mobile, Alabama hit this article yet again after the block lifted via an account with an insulting username. I have therefore placed it on permanent semi-protection so that legit users don't go banging their heads against the wall because of Bambifan101 and his Bottomless Sock Drawer. The little dweeb now has his own long-term abuse page, found here. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 00:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
What is exactly is wrong with stating that the characters from this film appeared is a handful of comics?-- Marktreut ( talk) 01:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
It has scans from the comics themselves. What more do you need? We're not getting anywhere with this. How about a short sentence in the opening paragraph like: "Comic strips based on the characters were also published."-- Marktreut ( talk) 15:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Any more of this of this and I'll start to question the evidence of Barack Obama being of African descent! I can imagine lawyers having an easier time convincing the Supreme Court of the constitutionality of their case than convincing you of facts that are plain for all to see. And all for what? A simple little harmless sentence that does no harm to anyone and just states facts! Somehow I don't think that this is about facts or the evidence. To misquote a French philosopher, it's more a case of certain people who have reached the point of "I argue therefore I am".-- Marktreut ( talk) 09:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
And an encyclopaedia is about providing information, not denying it.-- Marktreut ( talk) 17:28, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
One sentence on some comics that were released isn't enough to merit an entire section. However, most film articles contain a sub-section on marketing in the release section. If there's enough additional information on how the film was marketed we could create a new section and mention the comics in there. Ash Loomis ( talk) 00:12, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
I totally understand that good references are needed for any information, however I have the impression of a double standard that is applied here because of the personality of the editor. Many films have a subsection "in other media" which are not always referenced as per Wikipedia's principles, however the fact that those other media obviously exist seems sufficient for being mentioned in WP. For this film, many comic adaptations do exist and were published in many books and countries, so a mention of that in WP would not be problematic IMO. But I think I can find a few references that talk about comics at least in the "Red Book". I'll take look and see if it does look sufficient. Lerichard ( talk) 15:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
"tough he priases the voice work" it should be "though he praises the voice work"
Tuccle22 ( talk) 19:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move these pages at this time. GTBacchus( talk) 16:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
As the novel is the primary work, came before the film, and is notable, I feel this article should be moved to the film disambig (yes, this was the way it was several years ago and I myself erroneously moved it here). If the move is approved, I propose a three fold process:
Thoughts?-- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC) -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I am afraid the logic behind this proposal is completely flawed. If the film is now the primary topic, it is irrelevant that the novel preceded it and provided the source. We recently had a very similar discussion about the primary meaning of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. PatGallacher ( talk) 22:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
I would add that a number of fairly well-known films are based on obscure novels which are not now widely read, so this is irrelevant to deciding which is the primary topic. PatGallacher ( talk) 08:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
See a recent move discussion for To Catch a Thief, where it was decided that the film is the primary meaning, not the novel it was based on. If the novel is out of print and has been for some time this casts serious doubt on whether it is the primary meaning. AnmaFinotera is shifting his ground, is he claiming that there is no primary meaning, and if so why? PatGallacher ( talk) 12:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Per my understanding, the first 23 Disney animated feature films will become public domain films in the 2032-2072 range. Extrapolation suggests that this film should be in the public domain in 2076, but the "95-year rule" is only for works copyrighted before 1978. How do you calculate this film's public domain year?? Georgia guy ( talk) 16:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
![]() | Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
{{ edit semi-protected}}
The story of the film was written by:
Larry Clemmons
Ted Berman
David Michener
Peter Young
Burny Mattinson
Steve Hulett
Earl Kress
and Vance Gerry. Source:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082406/fullcredits. Also,
Peter Young points to a dab page.
64.134.25.177 ( talk) 14:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
In "Plot", it says, "She names him Tod (Keith Mitchell), "tod" being an old Scots word for fox." This is incorrect; in the film, she names him Tod because he's "such a little todler". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.159.114 ( talk) 01:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Not done:
The problem is that neither your statement nor the one that was in the article are verified by a reliable source. If she actually says one or the other in the movie, then we should add that one in. If either statement is just a supposition of people watching it, then that's original research, and doesn't belong in the article. I've gone ahead and removed the statement from the article, until such time as there is clarification.
Qwyrxian (
talk) 15:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} Hi, the plot is currently too long anyway, can someone please put back this edit as of 21 September 2010? 68.17.110.122 ( talk) 01:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
The current credit list in this article is absurdly long, listing seemingly everyone who had any connection with the film, including dozens of "uncredited" alleged animators. This is pointless trivia. Current Good Article The Iron Giant uses a much briefer format that I feel we should use here. I am suggesting we remove the "Animation by", "Layouts by" and "Backgrounds by" sections entirely. Comments? - SummerPhD ( talk) 15:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
What does Super RTL being owned by Walt Disney Productions have to do with The Fox and the Hound? 108.208.168.221 ( talk) 23:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think it's got JACK to do with it. Recommend deleting it. 98.90.4.147 ( talk) 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under "Design and animation", change this part: " With 17% of the animators now gone, production on he Fox and the Hound was delayed." The movie is not called "he Fox and the Hound, it's "The Fox and the Hound". 69.85.235.3 ( talk) 15:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article says Copper is named after the element of the same name, but this is not only not sourced, but probably incorrect. If anything, wasn't the Copper in the film named after the Copper from the 1967 novel by Daniel P. Mannix? Also, in this edit, the categories that were previously in the correct order got unordered, and one was removed. Can this be fixed? 69.85.217.198 ( talk) 22:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I don't think this should have Category:Animated fantasy films on it, it's not a fantasy film, it's a buddy movie. Could this be corrected? The last two categories also need to be alphabetized. 130.160.207.22 ( talk) 01:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I need to add a "credits" section for this page. May I?
74.104.151.204 ( talk) 21:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
It says "However, Chief catches Tod trying to escape on a railroad track and chases him, but is struck by an oncoming train and fatally wounded.", implying that chief died. This is wrong. Chief and Tod were on a railroad bridge when the train comes. Tod ducks under the train, and Chief jumps in the stream below, braking his leg. He is neither struck by the train nor fatally wounded.
201.82.25.188 ( talk) 12:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
"In the ensuing chase Copper catches Tod. Against better judgement, Copper decides to let Tod go and diverts Slade. Tod tries to escape on a railroad track, but is caught and pursued by Chief as a train suddenly passes by. Tod ducks under the train, but Chief is struck by the train and falls into the stream below, braking his leg. Angered by this, Copper and Slade blame Tod for the accident and vow vengeance."
I hope that satisfies you well enough. Kkjj ( talk) 11:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change braking to breaking 2601:982:8001:3700:D471:C9EB:F89D:9BEE ( talk) 10:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
When Tod tried to apologize to him, what made him think he was making up excuses. -- 75.172.110.80 ( talk) 00:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the plot section, change conversion to conversation. SlubJomones ( talk) 12:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Fox and the Hound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I think we should add that fans from the original story and critics were disappointed with story changes. -- Evope ( talk) 05:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal
http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/Disney_Dark_Age — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evope ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to the Soundtrack section that the film's orchestral score by Buddy Baker was never released on any music media. Pmastrippolito ( talk) 01:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Fox and the Hound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
For the "Cast" section, I would like to propose that the actors for Tod and Copper be listed and displayed like this for simplification purposes:
This is just a simple proposal. If needed, please take a moment to review. -- Draco9904 ( talk), 4:54, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
"Tweed names him Tod, because he reminds her of a toddler." Is that stated in the book/film? "Tod" is an old word meaning "fox", nothing to do with toddlers. Equinox ◑ 01:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The bear is a he. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.120.78.184 ( talk) 09:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "be" from "Tweed, realizing Tod is no longer be safe with her, leaves him at a..." so that it sounds correct. Meowcenary ( talk) 15:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
166.181.81.229 ( talk) 23:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Please enable the editing.
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change: “A power struggle between the two directors and co-producer Ron Miller broke out between them over key sections of the film with Miller supporting the younger Stevens. Miller instructed Reitherman to surrender reins over the junior personnel, but Reitherman resisted due to a lack of trust in the young animators.“ To: A power struggle between the two directors and co-producer Ron Miller broke out over key sections of the film with Miller supporting the younger Stevens. Miller instructed Reitherman to surrender reins over to the junior personnel, but Reitherman resisted due to a lack of trust in the young animators. Gooseman188 ( talk) 10:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
This article only uses "Amos" rather than the surname "Slade". However, is that really encyclopedic? Yes, he is only referred to by the first name, but isn't being encyclopedic more important than whether or not it matches what the movie said? Slade only refers to Tweed as "Widow" or "woman", but "Widow" is not a real name. My point being, shouldn't this be changed or at least discussed first? I wonder if anyone even cares, considering the lack of recent edits from registered users. Many of the recent edits have been reverted as well. Perhaps this page should be protected like Lady and the Tramp was? 104.58.147.5 ( talk) 22:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I'm not sure it's necessary to include the category for "Drama animation" when this page already has "Animated drama films". Shouldn't the former category be removed? 75.106.171.139 ( talk) 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The bear is a male bear, and is a he, him, and his. He is a giant vicious savage bear, that should be added to the plot. 2A02:C7C:CB5B:8200:D58C:BFC4:D754:793A ( talk) 11:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
What's with that (horrendous) picture of an octogenarian Don Bluth? He was in his 40s at the time. It's a very large picture that doesn't illustrate anything relevant to the information given and it's only presenting the reader with the bad candid shot of an old man who looks like he's having a stroke. Kumagoro-42 ( talk) 14:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Please make the plot look more better by adding vicious disturbed savage between giant and bear. And rename the bear an it to him, his, and he, because he is a he in the 1981 film. 2A02:C7C:CB5B:8200:3902:BF88:74E5:6A67 ( talk) 19:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)