![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the original content of this article with the content from the duplicate but incorrectly titled "Driller Killer" article. I did not see any content worth saving from original content under this title as the moved content allready covered the worthwhile info. -- Cab88 11:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This is clearly a messed up article. Unfortunately I am not familiar enough with the movie to fix it, but someone has combined a video game plot with the movie info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 ( talk) 09:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:DrillerKillerDVDLE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
I seem to remember the film being broadcast (possibly with cuts) on Channel 4 (UK) sometime c. 1997 ? Can anyone confirm ? 86.112.51.161 ( talk) 20:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
BetacommandBot 21:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw the template that said the plot synopsis was overly long. I have reduced this from over 1,000 words to about 300. I've seen to movie--there's no need to devote 1,000 words to it. I also cited the material about the remake. I removed material that could not be cited. I've just sent for a documentary on the nasties, so maybe this document will go into more detail about the censorship of this movie. If I can find verification that parts of the movie were blacked out, I will happily add it. Let me know if you have any comments/suggestions. ValkoWhite ( talk) 04:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I edited the original exactly 700 words. Some of the finer details needed to be removed to meet the accepted length. I also proofread it. My concern is that this isn't a description of the whole movie. I was watching an edited copy that cut some narrative scenes. This may be a description of a cut copy. I'll need to see the uncut version before I know what's being described here.
It looks like the remake was scrapped. I'm not sure it should even be mentioned. I left the original material and provided the sources I found about the remake.
There is a reissue of a critical study of the Nasites coming out in June. I may have more information after I get this text.
I'm also trying to find a reliable source to back the claim that the Damned "Nasty" lyrics say "Driller Killer is such a thrill" instead of "thrilling and killing is such a thrill." I think it's "Driller Killer," (If not, Vanian says "thrill" twice, which doesn't make sense) but I want to be able to source this because it's written differently on a lot of on-line lyric sheets. ValkoWhite ( talk) 06:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
If the film is in the public domain, how can there be two people who own the rights?-- 77.96.116.198 ( talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Can anyone check to see if these two sources are reliable?
Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 22:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I replaced the original content of this article with the content from the duplicate but incorrectly titled "Driller Killer" article. I did not see any content worth saving from original content under this title as the moved content allready covered the worthwhile info. -- Cab88 11:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
This is clearly a messed up article. Unfortunately I am not familiar enough with the movie to fix it, but someone has combined a video game plot with the movie info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 ( talk) 09:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Image:DrillerKillerDVDLE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
I seem to remember the film being broadcast (possibly with cuts) on Channel 4 (UK) sometime c. 1997 ? Can anyone confirm ? 86.112.51.161 ( talk) 20:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
BetacommandBot 21:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
I saw the template that said the plot synopsis was overly long. I have reduced this from over 1,000 words to about 300. I've seen to movie--there's no need to devote 1,000 words to it. I also cited the material about the remake. I removed material that could not be cited. I've just sent for a documentary on the nasties, so maybe this document will go into more detail about the censorship of this movie. If I can find verification that parts of the movie were blacked out, I will happily add it. Let me know if you have any comments/suggestions. ValkoWhite ( talk) 04:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I edited the original exactly 700 words. Some of the finer details needed to be removed to meet the accepted length. I also proofread it. My concern is that this isn't a description of the whole movie. I was watching an edited copy that cut some narrative scenes. This may be a description of a cut copy. I'll need to see the uncut version before I know what's being described here.
It looks like the remake was scrapped. I'm not sure it should even be mentioned. I left the original material and provided the sources I found about the remake.
There is a reissue of a critical study of the Nasites coming out in June. I may have more information after I get this text.
I'm also trying to find a reliable source to back the claim that the Damned "Nasty" lyrics say "Driller Killer is such a thrill" instead of "thrilling and killing is such a thrill." I think it's "Driller Killer," (If not, Vanian says "thrill" twice, which doesn't make sense) but I want to be able to source this because it's written differently on a lot of on-line lyric sheets. ValkoWhite ( talk) 06:46, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
If the film is in the public domain, how can there be two people who own the rights?-- 77.96.116.198 ( talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Can anyone check to see if these two sources are reliable?
Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 22:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 12:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)