![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved per the second discussion and considering these comments. Vegaswikian ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Dilemma (film) → The Dilemma — The so-called primary topic was a poem that does not appear to be notable, and I have since moved it to The Dilemma (poem) and have converted the primary article into a disambiguation page for now. The upcoming film is a mainstream film with a major director and major stars, and this should be the primary topic for what exists on Wikipedia. (I checked for other films called The Dilemma, but there was only a non-notable 1914 one.) -- Erik ( talk | contribs) 20:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
(film)
disambiguation is thus appropriate. If you want to reopen discussion to make the move, feel free to do so.
Erik (
talk |
contribs)
22:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)References to use. Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. The oppose comments from the first discussion were consider as a part of this discussion. The first discussion was never correctly opened, so opening this discussion does not present a problem and the comments from both were considered. Vegaswikian ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Dilemma (film) →
The Dilemma — I requested a move earlier than retracted my request since I thought redirecting
The Dilemma to
dilemma (disambiguation page) was enough. However, after my retraction,
The Dilemma (poem) was deleted for lack of notability, and
142 and 99 (
talk ·
contribs) made a good point about the example of
cure and
The Cure. While the disambiguation guidelines recommend combining sets of topics when the difference is an article (in this case, "the"), we only have one example with "The" here, the film. Like the band is the predominant topic at
The Cure, this film should be the predominant topic at
The Dilemma. There are no other topics on Wikipedia titled "The Dilemma", and any critical topic would have been created by now. It's safe to say that people typing "The Dilemma" will be looking for the film, especially in the next two months and later again with the DVD release. So I recommend moving the film article to
The Dilemma and providing a hatnote to
dilemma. --
Erik (
talk |
contribs)
00:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
THey met with Chrysler, not with GM. It's made apparent in the film, plus GM does not own Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep. Braniff747SP ( talk) 05:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
For the moment, this is not an official wp:RM requested move. I see the above two previous requested move discussions. It seems there are multiple works of art or literature etc. (films, a poem, perhaps more) named "The Dilemma", and that a disambiguation page is needed/appropriate, and is different than a disambiguation page on Dilemma or Dilemma (disambiguation). This relates to The Dilemma (film), currently a disambiguation page covering two films. I don't know if the recent film of this name should be considered PRIMARYUSAGE or not; tend to think not as I tend to think the film is not very big and it is just prominent in Google because of being recent. To comply perfectly with all disambiguation page guidelines, probably an article about the other film of this name needs to be created (or description added to some article or another), else disambiguation-focused editors will keep arriving and seeking to delete the entry or redirect the disambiguation page. And after creating one or more new articles on Wikipedia-notable works named "The Dilemma", then maybe a multiple page move is needed, to move the recent film article to an appropriate name and to make "The Dilemma" a disambiguation page. What needs to be done? Please do discuss, here. -- do ncr am 16:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
For the record, here is some content that Doncram chose to remove from his talk page:
It appears to me that someone was being pointy in opening this discussion, and is continuing that effort by attempting to pursue the matter -- and by expunging my comments from his talk page. Just saying. -- Orlady ( talk) 03:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: page moved per the second discussion and considering these comments. Vegaswikian ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Dilemma (film) → The Dilemma — The so-called primary topic was a poem that does not appear to be notable, and I have since moved it to The Dilemma (poem) and have converted the primary article into a disambiguation page for now. The upcoming film is a mainstream film with a major director and major stars, and this should be the primary topic for what exists on Wikipedia. (I checked for other films called The Dilemma, but there was only a non-notable 1914 one.) -- Erik ( talk | contribs) 20:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
(film)
disambiguation is thus appropriate. If you want to reopen discussion to make the move, feel free to do so.
Erik (
talk |
contribs)
22:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)References to use. Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. The oppose comments from the first discussion were consider as a part of this discussion. The first discussion was never correctly opened, so opening this discussion does not present a problem and the comments from both were considered. Vegaswikian ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
The Dilemma (film) →
The Dilemma — I requested a move earlier than retracted my request since I thought redirecting
The Dilemma to
dilemma (disambiguation page) was enough. However, after my retraction,
The Dilemma (poem) was deleted for lack of notability, and
142 and 99 (
talk ·
contribs) made a good point about the example of
cure and
The Cure. While the disambiguation guidelines recommend combining sets of topics when the difference is an article (in this case, "the"), we only have one example with "The" here, the film. Like the band is the predominant topic at
The Cure, this film should be the predominant topic at
The Dilemma. There are no other topics on Wikipedia titled "The Dilemma", and any critical topic would have been created by now. It's safe to say that people typing "The Dilemma" will be looking for the film, especially in the next two months and later again with the DVD release. So I recommend moving the film article to
The Dilemma and providing a hatnote to
dilemma. --
Erik (
talk |
contribs)
00:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
THey met with Chrysler, not with GM. It's made apparent in the film, plus GM does not own Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep. Braniff747SP ( talk) 05:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
For the moment, this is not an official wp:RM requested move. I see the above two previous requested move discussions. It seems there are multiple works of art or literature etc. (films, a poem, perhaps more) named "The Dilemma", and that a disambiguation page is needed/appropriate, and is different than a disambiguation page on Dilemma or Dilemma (disambiguation). This relates to The Dilemma (film), currently a disambiguation page covering two films. I don't know if the recent film of this name should be considered PRIMARYUSAGE or not; tend to think not as I tend to think the film is not very big and it is just prominent in Google because of being recent. To comply perfectly with all disambiguation page guidelines, probably an article about the other film of this name needs to be created (or description added to some article or another), else disambiguation-focused editors will keep arriving and seeking to delete the entry or redirect the disambiguation page. And after creating one or more new articles on Wikipedia-notable works named "The Dilemma", then maybe a multiple page move is needed, to move the recent film article to an appropriate name and to make "The Dilemma" a disambiguation page. What needs to be done? Please do discuss, here. -- do ncr am 16:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
For the record, here is some content that Doncram chose to remove from his talk page:
It appears to me that someone was being pointy in opening this discussion, and is continuing that effort by attempting to pursue the matter -- and by expunging my comments from his talk page. Just saying. -- Orlady ( talk) 03:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)