This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Angry Birds Movie 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Angry Birds Movie 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
I sure hope someone doesn't change the distributor. Because I want it to say distributed by Columbia Pictures once and for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:120E:C0C8:0:222A:66BC:2530 ( talk) 18:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Dang it pushed up 2 times already this year to August 16, 2019. Benjaminkirsc ( talk) 10:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Is there any source where Brooklynn Prince will voice Zoe (one of the Hatchlings)? I don't see any source about them. We might have to wait for the trailer or the whole movie to come out to see her character's name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.37.31.232 ( talk) 07:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Several people have changed the article to say the film received positive instead of mixed reviews. Objectively and in keeping with WP:NPOV Metacritic says the film received "mixed or average reviews". I understand that there is a selection bias and that people editing this article are likely to have enjoyed the film but the reviews were mixed. -- 109.76.152.228 ( talk) 05:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Mixed reviews seems reasonable from the reception section and the overall summary from Metacritic. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
User:ThunderPheonix2021 has repeatedly tried to changes to the article, but has not added any comment here, or tried to get consensus.
Mixed always includes some positive, so the suggestion (in a recent edit by User:ThunderPheonix2021) of a wording like "mixed positive" doesn't seem workable or appropriate. The all or nothing approach of Rotten Tomatoes is the problem here, reducing every review to either bad or good has in this case taken a whole lot of reviews that were generally mixed but leaning slightly more positive and come out with a bigger score over all. Metacritic is more objective and transparent in their ratings, they take more neutral point of view which I think is more appropriate, than the polarizing approach.
Ultimately it is difficult to summarize conflicting sources, without selection bias. It might be better to not try at all in this case, and instead include a few specific quotes, that are fair and representative such as "improves on the original" CommonSenseMedia ( APNews also praised it "for finding a way to actually improve on the 2016 original"). But please try to discuss something we might be able to agree on first. -- 109.79.187.214 ( talk) 15:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
mixed-to-positive is not acceptable, pick one or the other [2]. It is bad writing, it is vague. See also WP:VG/MIXED. -- 109.78.195.140 ( talk) 04:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Some editors really want to ignore the fact that Metacritic says the reviews were mixed. [3] This was discussed and agreed already, so if you not already read the above discussion please read it, and then explain how you would strike a balance between both Metacritic AND Rotten Tomatoes? -- 109.76.200.55 ( talk) 05:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
The article states that The Angry Birds Movie 2 is the best reviewed film based on a video game of 2020. However, this is contradicted by the Wikipedia article of Detention and its Rotten Tomatoes page. With 33 reviews and an approval rating of 85% this makes Detention, not The Angry Birds Movie 2 as the best reviewed film based on a video game on Rotten Tomatoes, as of 2020. -- Rory Kamau de Alencar Lourinho ( talk) 14:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I get it that it could be repetitive, but the full title of the film should be repeated because it is necessary, especially when it comes to being released in the day. This is also consistency for film articles (e.g. Five Nights at Freddy's is scheduled to be released simultaneously in theaters and on Peacock in the United States on October 27, 2023, by Universal Pictures.). LancedSoul ( talk) 02:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Uh... where is it said that Sony won't be involved? It seems very likely that Sony WILL be involved! 2600:1700:2230:CCB0:2925:1331:2059:BA33 ( talk) 16:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Angry Birds Movie 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Angry Birds Movie 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I sure hope someone doesn't change the distributor. Because I want it to say distributed by Columbia Pictures once and for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:120E:C0C8:0:222A:66BC:2530 ( talk) 18:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Dang it pushed up 2 times already this year to August 16, 2019. Benjaminkirsc ( talk) 10:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Is there any source where Brooklynn Prince will voice Zoe (one of the Hatchlings)? I don't see any source about them. We might have to wait for the trailer or the whole movie to come out to see her character's name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.37.31.232 ( talk) 07:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Several people have changed the article to say the film received positive instead of mixed reviews. Objectively and in keeping with WP:NPOV Metacritic says the film received "mixed or average reviews". I understand that there is a selection bias and that people editing this article are likely to have enjoyed the film but the reviews were mixed. -- 109.76.152.228 ( talk) 05:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Mixed reviews seems reasonable from the reception section and the overall summary from Metacritic. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 03:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
User:ThunderPheonix2021 has repeatedly tried to changes to the article, but has not added any comment here, or tried to get consensus.
Mixed always includes some positive, so the suggestion (in a recent edit by User:ThunderPheonix2021) of a wording like "mixed positive" doesn't seem workable or appropriate. The all or nothing approach of Rotten Tomatoes is the problem here, reducing every review to either bad or good has in this case taken a whole lot of reviews that were generally mixed but leaning slightly more positive and come out with a bigger score over all. Metacritic is more objective and transparent in their ratings, they take more neutral point of view which I think is more appropriate, than the polarizing approach.
Ultimately it is difficult to summarize conflicting sources, without selection bias. It might be better to not try at all in this case, and instead include a few specific quotes, that are fair and representative such as "improves on the original" CommonSenseMedia ( APNews also praised it "for finding a way to actually improve on the 2016 original"). But please try to discuss something we might be able to agree on first. -- 109.79.187.214 ( talk) 15:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
mixed-to-positive is not acceptable, pick one or the other [2]. It is bad writing, it is vague. See also WP:VG/MIXED. -- 109.78.195.140 ( talk) 04:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Some editors really want to ignore the fact that Metacritic says the reviews were mixed. [3] This was discussed and agreed already, so if you not already read the above discussion please read it, and then explain how you would strike a balance between both Metacritic AND Rotten Tomatoes? -- 109.76.200.55 ( talk) 05:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
The article states that The Angry Birds Movie 2 is the best reviewed film based on a video game of 2020. However, this is contradicted by the Wikipedia article of Detention and its Rotten Tomatoes page. With 33 reviews and an approval rating of 85% this makes Detention, not The Angry Birds Movie 2 as the best reviewed film based on a video game on Rotten Tomatoes, as of 2020. -- Rory Kamau de Alencar Lourinho ( talk) 14:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
I get it that it could be repetitive, but the full title of the film should be repeated because it is necessary, especially when it comes to being released in the day. This is also consistency for film articles (e.g. Five Nights at Freddy's is scheduled to be released simultaneously in theaters and on Peacock in the United States on October 27, 2023, by Universal Pictures.). LancedSoul ( talk) 02:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Uh... where is it said that Sony won't be involved? It seems very likely that Sony WILL be involved! 2600:1700:2230:CCB0:2925:1331:2059:BA33 ( talk) 16:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)