Terror Train has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 7, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
A fact from Terror Train appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 June 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Image:Terrortrainposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear god please learn to use paragraphs. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.236.137.239 (
talk) 20:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
"starring in three horror films in one year made her a "Scream Queen", (which was improvised in the movie Scream)." What does this mean? The parenthetical part, what does it mean? 24.225.102.159 ( talk) 09:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Corrected multitudinous punctuation issues in the Plot section, and made minor changes to syntax for the purpose of clarity. Bodypuzzle ( talk) 07:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Performed a major overhaul on this page:
Deleted the "Information" section. Moved VHS/DVD info to its own section. Moved info on Spottiswoode up to the main subject summary. Eliminated the following as either unverifiable original research/opinion or irrelevant to the subject:
Bodypuzzle ( talk) 09:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Terror Train (movie) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Terror Train (movie) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ★Trekker ( talk) 14:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: MagicatthemovieS ( talk · contribs) 07:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 11:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is well-written | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Complies with MoS standards for plots, leads, and layout | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Otherwise, Refs are in a proper 'References' section with a works cited below | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Sources, mostly online articles or book excerpts, are reliable | |
2c. it contains no original research. | I trust that there's no OR based on the various sources I randomly checked- all good here | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | addresses everything a film article should | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images correctly CC or fair use tagged | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Captions relevant and captioned properly | |
7. Overall assessment. |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 17:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I wouldn't go with the image, personally, as ALT2 is the weakest. I prefer ALT1. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Terror Train has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 7, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
A fact from Terror Train appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 June 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Image:Terrortrainposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear god please learn to use paragraphs. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.236.137.239 (
talk) 20:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
"starring in three horror films in one year made her a "Scream Queen", (which was improvised in the movie Scream)." What does this mean? The parenthetical part, what does it mean? 24.225.102.159 ( talk) 09:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Corrected multitudinous punctuation issues in the Plot section, and made minor changes to syntax for the purpose of clarity. Bodypuzzle ( talk) 07:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Performed a major overhaul on this page:
Deleted the "Information" section. Moved VHS/DVD info to its own section. Moved info on Spottiswoode up to the main subject summary. Eliminated the following as either unverifiable original research/opinion or irrelevant to the subject:
Bodypuzzle ( talk) 09:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Terror Train (movie) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Terror Train (movie) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ★Trekker ( talk) 14:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: MagicatthemovieS ( talk · contribs) 07:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 11:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is well-written | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Complies with MoS standards for plots, leads, and layout | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Otherwise, Refs are in a proper 'References' section with a works cited below | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Sources, mostly online articles or book excerpts, are reliable | |
2c. it contains no original research. | I trust that there's no OR based on the various sources I randomly checked- all good here | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | addresses everything a film article should | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images correctly CC or fair use tagged | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Captions relevant and captioned properly | |
7. Overall assessment. |
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 17:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.MyCatIsAChonk ( talk) ( not me) ( also not me) ( still no) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I wouldn't go with the image, personally, as ALT2 is the weakest. I prefer ALT1. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)