This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sukyo Mahikari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I recently read Religion and Cyberspace and Japanese New Religions, which are sources currently cited on this page, and will be making some edits based upon these books. For any questions about this content, please comment here. Orlivia ( talk) 01:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added one sentence on natural farming from Japanese New Religions book. Orlivia ( talk) 02:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added more content from previously cited source Orlivia ( talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia
The article about mahikari is far from being neutral. It mixes and distorts some of their concepts with some ones pesonal interpretation regarding the topic. It´s not about agreeing or desagreeing with the contend, but pointing out the way it´s presented.
words like: a lot, many... show how are we adding to the facts our personal opinion. And this should not be happening in a wikipedia page.
Being neutral is really a challeging task. When we tell or write a fact, we tend also to include some of own values and personal views, but the purpose of wikipedia, as far, as I understand it, is to inform, leaving aside personal opinion. Religions are in fact very delicate topics. But being neutral should be the goal and if a page is incapable of it, whould be removed or re-written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exs sky ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Mahikari is a real cult and listed here /info/en/?search=Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects So you are wrong! N1gh7r4v3n ( talk) 21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sukyo Mahikari. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sukyo Mahikari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I recently read Religion and Cyberspace and Japanese New Religions, which are sources currently cited on this page, and will be making some edits based upon these books. For any questions about this content, please comment here. Orlivia ( talk) 01:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added one sentence on natural farming from Japanese New Religions book. Orlivia ( talk) 02:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia Added more content from previously cited source Orlivia ( talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Orlivia
The article about mahikari is far from being neutral. It mixes and distorts some of their concepts with some ones pesonal interpretation regarding the topic. It´s not about agreeing or desagreeing with the contend, but pointing out the way it´s presented.
words like: a lot, many... show how are we adding to the facts our personal opinion. And this should not be happening in a wikipedia page.
Being neutral is really a challeging task. When we tell or write a fact, we tend also to include some of own values and personal views, but the purpose of wikipedia, as far, as I understand it, is to inform, leaving aside personal opinion. Religions are in fact very delicate topics. But being neutral should be the goal and if a page is incapable of it, whould be removed or re-written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exs sky ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Mahikari is a real cult and listed here /info/en/?search=Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects So you are wrong! N1gh7r4v3n ( talk) 21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sukyo Mahikari. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)