This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

& Information

Sorry to move the page yet again — but (movie) tag or no, the film still takes an ampersand. - Sara 06:18, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

• I think that the original Huggy Bear may have made a cameo at the end, where the original Starsky and Hutch are. I believe he's the one talking to the two prostitutes saying he is a personal friend of Huggy Bear, but I can't be sure. Anyone got any info on that? Spartacusprime 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC) reply

that can't be right. this movie did not cost more than a billion dollars, plus those numbers are obviously fake. and theres a comma missing. fixit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.194.147.32 ( talk) 04:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Why is Ed Roney's opinion about this movie given his own paragraph. It also says almost nothing new about the general consensus on the movie. I believe it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.222.146 ( talk) 00:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply