This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
Contoversy concerning the name - why delete it ?
What is the reason to constantly deleting the section about the naming controversy of the stadium ?
There are enough quotes that confirm there was a huge controversy concerning the naming of the stadium.
I also added your text about how the petition was rejected by the chamber of deputies! So why delete this text ?
Kind regards,
Letzebuergerr
As per
Wikipedia:Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to
WP:NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate.
Luxofluxo (
talk)
17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
Contoversy concerning the name - why delete it ?
What is the reason to constantly deleting the section about the naming controversy of the stadium ?
There are enough quotes that confirm there was a huge controversy concerning the naming of the stadium.
I also added your text about how the petition was rejected by the chamber of deputies! So why delete this text ?
Kind regards,
Letzebuergerr
As per
Wikipedia:Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to
WP:NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate.
Luxofluxo (
talk)
17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion: