WikiProject Rugby union was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 31 October 2011. |
WikiProject Rugby Union announcements and open tasks watch · · discuss | |
---|---|
Announcements and News | |
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Good article nominees
Requested moves
Articles for creation
Request for review: Limassol Crusaders | |
Collaboration | |
Current Collaboration - None
| |
Requested articles | |
|
Add this to-do list to your User page! {{ WPRU Announcements}}
Rugby union Project‑class | |||||||
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello - I have a query re: the Fifita family that I would welcome input on.
Category:Fifita professional wrestling family is about a family from Tonga that emigrated to the United States. However, one of the in-laws, Steve Fifita, is an Australian rugby union player.
Category:Fifita family is about a family of Australian rugby union players of Tongan descent.
My query is, are these two separate families that just happen to share a surname, or are they branches of the same family?
Any input welcome. McPhail ( talk) 20:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Could someone else look over the Craig Joubert article. There are some Australian ips doing some revisionist history to the 2015 quarter final. Aircorn (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
@ AFC Vixen, Rugby.change, Stevie fae Scotland, BubbaJoe123456, Ruggalicious, Primefac, and Bcp67: In the last discussion I could find we agreed to use sports table for automatic formatting, consistency checking of rugby sports tables. Has anything changed since this discussion? I ask because User:Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel is continuing to revert tables back to the old format. I can understand if it is easier to update tables that are currently in progress, but seems strange to do this for tables that are no longer changing. these wholesale reverts are also re-introducing errors that need to be subsequently corrected like missing scores, typos and links to the wrong external results, ... if there is no longer consensus to update these tables to use Module:Sports table, please let me know. Frietjes ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
a user who chose personal beef with me" when the opposite is true. You started this with what an administrator described as "
clear stonewalling" to prevent Module:Sports table from being used on the Top 14 pages. [1] An RfC was unanimous in upholding the change, but despite you claiming initially to accept this resolution to the dispute, [2] you later reverted it again. [3] You have since openly wrote about your hatred of me and your perverse thoughts about my motives, [4 [5] called my contributions "
gibberish", [6] "
rubbish", [7] and "
wasting time and energy", [5] called me "
lazy" twice, [4 [8 bullied me for a copying error, [9] and even (poorly) attempted to gaslight me by rewriting a reply, editing the page, and pretending an issue I had didn't exist. [10] [11] You have also said many things coloured in battleground and ownership behaviour, such as "
This is not broken, therefore it does NOT need fixing. Therefore it will NOT be fixed", [12] "
I do not need you deliberately saying everything is garbage because it isn't", [4 "
Stop wasting my time. We're doing it the same way [...] and that is final", [5 and "
don't touch the stuff I touch." [13]
losing battle", or a change in the RfC consensus and the productive dialogue in the aforementioned discussion. Just revert their edits, and if they continue to engage in edit warring, there's always WP:ANI. — AFC Vixen 🦊 14:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Just revert their editsand it doesn't work if I am the only one doing the reverting and it doesn't address the root cause of the problem (just creates more work and edit warring). is the next step an (1) another poll here, (2) RFC to get more input, (3) ANI to get more administrators involved, or ... Frietjes ( talk) 16:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
This might be a daft question, but would it make sense to have a template/module that stores the international cap/points information for the players on those teams? I feel like the international teams are more likely to have a good record of who played for them (at least moreso than the club teams) and would make updating the information in infoboxes etc a lot easier because it will all be in a central location (as opposed to for example updating the caps for each player on each team after a Six Nations weekend). I'm not necessarily wanting to talk about exact implementation or coding at the moment, just wondering if this is something that folks would find useful. Primefac ( talk) 07:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Some recent edits at the above are junk and I semi-protected the article for a week to reduce the excitement. However I'm not sure how much should be reverted and I'm hoping someone here can fix. Thanks! Johnuniq ( talk) 22:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
It was brought to my attention that there may be a large number of rugby players that do not have images in their infobox, are not tagged (on the talk page) with |needs-infobox=yes
, yet there does exist an image (e.g.
Aaron Mauger and
File:Aaron Mauger 2023.png). If I set up some sort of tracking category to indicate these "articles with image but missing an image" would folks be willing to help out and depopulate the cat?
Primefac (
talk) 20:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
After looking at the article Wales Rugby Union, I felt it needed some updating in comparison to other articles. Not every rugby nation has a specific executive article, in fact, upon inspection, only Wales, New Zealand Rugby, and Rugby Australia have articles specific for management and executive personnel, and Wales seems to be the only nation with a President list, albeit unsourced. I wanted to look into improving Wales' WRU article with relevance to updating the content and rewriting the article to bring it to a higher standard. Any suggestions or ideas on how or if this should be done? Cltjames ( talk) 13:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Rugby union was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 31 October 2011. |
WikiProject Rugby Union announcements and open tasks watch · · discuss | |
---|---|
Announcements and News | |
Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Good article nominees
Requested moves
Articles for creation
Request for review: Limassol Crusaders | |
Collaboration | |
Current Collaboration - None
| |
Requested articles | |
|
Add this to-do list to your User page! {{ WPRU Announcements}}
Rugby union Project‑class | |||||||
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello - I have a query re: the Fifita family that I would welcome input on.
Category:Fifita professional wrestling family is about a family from Tonga that emigrated to the United States. However, one of the in-laws, Steve Fifita, is an Australian rugby union player.
Category:Fifita family is about a family of Australian rugby union players of Tongan descent.
My query is, are these two separate families that just happen to share a surname, or are they branches of the same family?
Any input welcome. McPhail ( talk) 20:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Could someone else look over the Craig Joubert article. There are some Australian ips doing some revisionist history to the 2015 quarter final. Aircorn (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
@ AFC Vixen, Rugby.change, Stevie fae Scotland, BubbaJoe123456, Ruggalicious, Primefac, and Bcp67: In the last discussion I could find we agreed to use sports table for automatic formatting, consistency checking of rugby sports tables. Has anything changed since this discussion? I ask because User:Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel is continuing to revert tables back to the old format. I can understand if it is easier to update tables that are currently in progress, but seems strange to do this for tables that are no longer changing. these wholesale reverts are also re-introducing errors that need to be subsequently corrected like missing scores, typos and links to the wrong external results, ... if there is no longer consensus to update these tables to use Module:Sports table, please let me know. Frietjes ( talk) 16:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
a user who chose personal beef with me" when the opposite is true. You started this with what an administrator described as "
clear stonewalling" to prevent Module:Sports table from being used on the Top 14 pages. [1] An RfC was unanimous in upholding the change, but despite you claiming initially to accept this resolution to the dispute, [2] you later reverted it again. [3] You have since openly wrote about your hatred of me and your perverse thoughts about my motives, [4 [5] called my contributions "
gibberish", [6] "
rubbish", [7] and "
wasting time and energy", [5] called me "
lazy" twice, [4 [8 bullied me for a copying error, [9] and even (poorly) attempted to gaslight me by rewriting a reply, editing the page, and pretending an issue I had didn't exist. [10] [11] You have also said many things coloured in battleground and ownership behaviour, such as "
This is not broken, therefore it does NOT need fixing. Therefore it will NOT be fixed", [12] "
I do not need you deliberately saying everything is garbage because it isn't", [4 "
Stop wasting my time. We're doing it the same way [...] and that is final", [5 and "
don't touch the stuff I touch." [13]
losing battle", or a change in the RfC consensus and the productive dialogue in the aforementioned discussion. Just revert their edits, and if they continue to engage in edit warring, there's always WP:ANI. — AFC Vixen 🦊 14:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Just revert their editsand it doesn't work if I am the only one doing the reverting and it doesn't address the root cause of the problem (just creates more work and edit warring). is the next step an (1) another poll here, (2) RFC to get more input, (3) ANI to get more administrators involved, or ... Frietjes ( talk) 16:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
This might be a daft question, but would it make sense to have a template/module that stores the international cap/points information for the players on those teams? I feel like the international teams are more likely to have a good record of who played for them (at least moreso than the club teams) and would make updating the information in infoboxes etc a lot easier because it will all be in a central location (as opposed to for example updating the caps for each player on each team after a Six Nations weekend). I'm not necessarily wanting to talk about exact implementation or coding at the moment, just wondering if this is something that folks would find useful. Primefac ( talk) 07:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Some recent edits at the above are junk and I semi-protected the article for a week to reduce the excitement. However I'm not sure how much should be reverted and I'm hoping someone here can fix. Thanks! Johnuniq ( talk) 22:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
It was brought to my attention that there may be a large number of rugby players that do not have images in their infobox, are not tagged (on the talk page) with |needs-infobox=yes
, yet there does exist an image (e.g.
Aaron Mauger and
File:Aaron Mauger 2023.png). If I set up some sort of tracking category to indicate these "articles with image but missing an image" would folks be willing to help out and depopulate the cat?
Primefac (
talk) 20:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
After looking at the article Wales Rugby Union, I felt it needed some updating in comparison to other articles. Not every rugby nation has a specific executive article, in fact, upon inspection, only Wales, New Zealand Rugby, and Rugby Australia have articles specific for management and executive personnel, and Wales seems to be the only nation with a President list, albeit unsourced. I wanted to look into improving Wales' WRU article with relevance to updating the content and rewriting the article to bring it to a higher standard. Any suggestions or ideas on how or if this should be done? Cltjames ( talk) 13:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)