![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Harmony Korine. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Harmony Korine. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"want to wants" 72.177.6.195 ( talk) 04:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
'want to go on a adventure.' should be 'want to go on an adventure." 76.3.195.8 ( talk) 00:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Therefor should be spelled Therefore 76.3.195.8 ( talk) 00:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Done I don't know who wrote it but the spelling wasn't too good. Thanks!
FloBo
A boat that can float!
(watch me float!)
05:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
EDM boy king Skrillex is scoring for the film! I came here to learn more about it, but you guys don't even mention him. Let's get his name in there somewhere! :) http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/skrillex-to-score-harmony-korines-spring-breakers-20120702 JBAnonymous ( talk) 13:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
http://tiff.net/filmsandschedules/tiff/2012/springbreakers There's a new synopsis for the movie. There's also the first clip of the movie http://vimeo.com/48406777. & a site for the movie http://www.springbreakersfilm.com
SpringBreakers1 ( talk) 03:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the line below to the "Cast" section or the "Production" section.
A character played by [[James Franco]] is based on a rapper [[Riff Raff (rapper)|Riff Raff]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vibe.com/article/james-franco-play-riff-raff-upcoming-harmony-korine-film|title=James Franco to Play Riff Raff in Upcoming Harmony Korine Film|publisher=[[Vibe (magazine)|Vibe]]|first=Stephanie|last=Long|date=March 28, 2012}}</ref>
122.26.219.232 ( talk) 22:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done:
{{
edit semi-protected}}
is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. The article is no longer protected. Feel free to edit it yourself. Thank you.
Begoon
talk
03:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Is the release date of March 5, 2013 correct? I've seen it on a few other sites as well, but it seems strange that this movie would be coming out on a Tuesday. Is that the reason it still hasn't been added to the 2013 in film article? Also, does anyone know if this movie is going to be in wide release or limited release? Alphius ( talk) 15:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I have removed the "comedy-drama" genre from the first sentance because there really is no real comedy in the film. Sure, some parts may provoke laughter, but you wouldn't call Argo a comedy-drama, and it was more intentionally funny than this.— 24.231.72.57 ( talk) 00:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Noting that it's not up to us to decide on genres. I've added citations. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
In total, that gives us 1 for thriller, 1 extra for comedy (making 6), 1 for crime, 2 for crime drama and some sort-of okay sources for other genres and the others are for sources. So having 1 and 2 is not really comparable to the three I have. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
The New York Times calls it an "Action, Crime, Drama", The Washington Post has it under "Action/Adventure", The Guardian says "Comedy, Drama, Crime", while the producers designate it as a drama. Added to the already cited sources, I think there is enough inconsistency across different reliable sources as to conclude there is no consensus. I recommend removing references to genre, I've seen plenty of film articles that do this. An alternative would be to create a section that makes the point of the wide disparity in genre designation. Avoiding mention and cataloging of genre, will leave it up to each reader to conclude what it is, based on the plot description. And it's far simpler. — Santiago Mendez ( talk) 18:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Listing five genres is pointless and absurdist. Best to let the reader decide based upon description of plot. Plenty of other film articles have done this to avoid needless genre edit-warring and overall confusion in lede sentences. As such, I removed the genres from the lede. Icarus of old ( talk) 23:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
After its appearance, the movie triggered a debate in the blogsphere and among critics regarding the role of its women characters. Summarising, some claim the film is sexist by objectifying their bodies, while others claim that, for once, women are not victims but empowered heroines. On September I tried to write about such debate: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spring_Breakers&diff=571853194&oldid=571818908
but Thargor considered the sources were not reliable enough. I was referencing a few blog posts to show that there were plenty of bloggers for and against. I could search for more reliable or important sources about the issue (e.g. The Guardian or Rolling Stone), as the film is shown still now as a source of debate. Would that be ok, adding such sources? Or does anyone have any other advises for it to be noteworthy enough to be kept?-- Samer.hc ( talk) 10:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't like how this section was written. Some words seem out of place and the quote from Rolling Stone appears awkwardly; it doesn't flow like it should. -- Matt723star ( talk) 16:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I've deleted the section about the alleged Spring Breakers sequel. The first time because it was submitted by a sockpuppet of a community banned vandal, KuhnstylePro. There is no requirement to be discriminating when reverting banned users' contributions, so that deletion was absolutely legitimate. I deleted it a second time after it was re-submitted by brand-new user SpringBreakersNo1, because the content attempts to assert as fact something that is only hinted at in the source. "James Franco Hints At 'Spring Breakers' Sequel: Is It Possible?" This is not an official announcement, and Wikipedia is not a breaking news site, or a gossip mill. When the project has been confirmed by a reliable source it can be included again. Disagree? Voice your thoughts here. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Just wondering. Because the description here through me for a loop after seeing the poster and reading the synopsis. yonnie ( talk) 05:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Should she even be listed in the cast section? 'cause I don't even remember ever actually seeing this character. Scream4man ( talk) 03:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
An editor has repeatedly added Timothy Olyphant to the cast list, but after checking several databases I can find no evidence of him appearing in this film. This looks like a factual error, and despite my request for a source the editor has simply reverted me. I am going to this actor once again and I do not expect the name to be restored without a source. Betty Logan ( talk) 12:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It was first shown in 2012, so why is it classed as a 2013 film? Jim Michael ( talk) 00:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Harmony Korine. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Harmony Korine. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"want to wants" 72.177.6.195 ( talk) 04:39, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
'want to go on a adventure.' should be 'want to go on an adventure." 76.3.195.8 ( talk) 00:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Therefor should be spelled Therefore 76.3.195.8 ( talk) 00:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Done I don't know who wrote it but the spelling wasn't too good. Thanks!
FloBo
A boat that can float!
(watch me float!)
05:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
EDM boy king Skrillex is scoring for the film! I came here to learn more about it, but you guys don't even mention him. Let's get his name in there somewhere! :) http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/skrillex-to-score-harmony-korines-spring-breakers-20120702 JBAnonymous ( talk) 13:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
http://tiff.net/filmsandschedules/tiff/2012/springbreakers There's a new synopsis for the movie. There's also the first clip of the movie http://vimeo.com/48406777. & a site for the movie http://www.springbreakersfilm.com
SpringBreakers1 ( talk) 03:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the line below to the "Cast" section or the "Production" section.
A character played by [[James Franco]] is based on a rapper [[Riff Raff (rapper)|Riff Raff]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vibe.com/article/james-franco-play-riff-raff-upcoming-harmony-korine-film|title=James Franco to Play Riff Raff in Upcoming Harmony Korine Film|publisher=[[Vibe (magazine)|Vibe]]|first=Stephanie|last=Long|date=March 28, 2012}}</ref>
122.26.219.232 ( talk) 22:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done:
{{
edit semi-protected}}
is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. The article is no longer protected. Feel free to edit it yourself. Thank you.
Begoon
talk
03:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Is the release date of March 5, 2013 correct? I've seen it on a few other sites as well, but it seems strange that this movie would be coming out on a Tuesday. Is that the reason it still hasn't been added to the 2013 in film article? Also, does anyone know if this movie is going to be in wide release or limited release? Alphius ( talk) 15:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I have removed the "comedy-drama" genre from the first sentance because there really is no real comedy in the film. Sure, some parts may provoke laughter, but you wouldn't call Argo a comedy-drama, and it was more intentionally funny than this.— 24.231.72.57 ( talk) 00:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Noting that it's not up to us to decide on genres. I've added citations. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 20:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
In total, that gives us 1 for thriller, 1 extra for comedy (making 6), 1 for crime, 2 for crime drama and some sort-of okay sources for other genres and the others are for sources. So having 1 and 2 is not really comparable to the three I have. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
The New York Times calls it an "Action, Crime, Drama", The Washington Post has it under "Action/Adventure", The Guardian says "Comedy, Drama, Crime", while the producers designate it as a drama. Added to the already cited sources, I think there is enough inconsistency across different reliable sources as to conclude there is no consensus. I recommend removing references to genre, I've seen plenty of film articles that do this. An alternative would be to create a section that makes the point of the wide disparity in genre designation. Avoiding mention and cataloging of genre, will leave it up to each reader to conclude what it is, based on the plot description. And it's far simpler. — Santiago Mendez ( talk) 18:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Listing five genres is pointless and absurdist. Best to let the reader decide based upon description of plot. Plenty of other film articles have done this to avoid needless genre edit-warring and overall confusion in lede sentences. As such, I removed the genres from the lede. Icarus of old ( talk) 23:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
After its appearance, the movie triggered a debate in the blogsphere and among critics regarding the role of its women characters. Summarising, some claim the film is sexist by objectifying their bodies, while others claim that, for once, women are not victims but empowered heroines. On September I tried to write about such debate: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Spring_Breakers&diff=571853194&oldid=571818908
but Thargor considered the sources were not reliable enough. I was referencing a few blog posts to show that there were plenty of bloggers for and against. I could search for more reliable or important sources about the issue (e.g. The Guardian or Rolling Stone), as the film is shown still now as a source of debate. Would that be ok, adding such sources? Or does anyone have any other advises for it to be noteworthy enough to be kept?-- Samer.hc ( talk) 10:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't like how this section was written. Some words seem out of place and the quote from Rolling Stone appears awkwardly; it doesn't flow like it should. -- Matt723star ( talk) 16:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I've deleted the section about the alleged Spring Breakers sequel. The first time because it was submitted by a sockpuppet of a community banned vandal, KuhnstylePro. There is no requirement to be discriminating when reverting banned users' contributions, so that deletion was absolutely legitimate. I deleted it a second time after it was re-submitted by brand-new user SpringBreakersNo1, because the content attempts to assert as fact something that is only hinted at in the source. "James Franco Hints At 'Spring Breakers' Sequel: Is It Possible?" This is not an official announcement, and Wikipedia is not a breaking news site, or a gossip mill. When the project has been confirmed by a reliable source it can be included again. Disagree? Voice your thoughts here. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 23:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Just wondering. Because the description here through me for a loop after seeing the poster and reading the synopsis. yonnie ( talk) 05:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Should she even be listed in the cast section? 'cause I don't even remember ever actually seeing this character. Scream4man ( talk) 03:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
An editor has repeatedly added Timothy Olyphant to the cast list, but after checking several databases I can find no evidence of him appearing in this film. This looks like a factual error, and despite my request for a source the editor has simply reverted me. I am going to this actor once again and I do not expect the name to be restored without a source. Betty Logan ( talk) 12:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
It was first shown in 2012, so why is it classed as a 2013 film? Jim Michael ( talk) 00:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)