This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Television High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. California High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am aware of the validity of this Studio, after all, I worked for SONY for more than 20 years! However, I saw it's missing a lot of citations. Please correct my additions if they're incorrect but I don't think that just because we're all familiar with a Major Studio, that should allow it to not adhere to the regulations of Wikipedia. I did see that it refers to another article which might possibly cite and reference some of these stated facts, but why should that preclude it from its own responsibilities as a stand alone article? If you'd like me to find these citations, I'll happily do that research at a later time (asap). I welcome the discussion. Thank you. -- SonyExecCulver2003 ( talk) 18:18, 27 June 2019 (UTC) reply