![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why wasn't Monster House mentioned? I fixed it, but still...
According to Sony Pictures Animation's artist, Armand Serrano, Sony has cancelled The Familiars: http://armandserrano.blogspot.com/2012/08/bridgetower.html, http://armandserrano.blogspot.com/2012/09/bridgetower-2.html.
Are there still any objections against the removal of The Familiars from this article?-- Carniolus ( talk) 12:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
I added the following paragraph:
A computer animation wage theft cartel, which started in the mid-1990s was only uncovered in 2014, and is going to trial in 2015. It involved Pixar Animation Studios, Walt Disney Animation Studios, Lucasfilm, ImageMovers Digital and Blue Sky Animation. Human resources departments heads and their recruiters met secretly each year, agreed not to hire each others animation studio's staff, and deprived employees of higher wages.(Mark Ames (2 December 2014). "New court filing shows stunning new evidence of wage-fixing by major Hollywood animation studios". Pando Daily News. Retrieved 29 January 2015.)
Koala15 removed this, with the edit summary "hardly notable, companies like this get lawsuits all the time". When I asked him not to remove sourced info and discuss this issue on this talk page to reach consensus, rather than continuing to remove, he wrote again it was "not quite notable" and refused discussion. When I reinserted, he did just that -remove again, INSISTING in the edit summary "its sourced but not quite notable".
WP:Notability is a test used to decide whether a topic warrants its own article, which is not what I am proposing here. ANd notability guidelines do not apply to article content. Info does need to be WP:verifiable, and this is. Did Koala15 mix up the 2 issues?
Info is noteworthy (maybe Koala15 meant that?), in that the prosecution of this wage theft cartel will not be your everyday lawsuit, but is a big deal when you just look at its length of existence and the sheer size, the companies involved, the many tech people affected by it. It appears to me that this user may just not have read the source. Here is a shorter article from 9-9-14 Do others think thid paragraph isnt noteworthy?? I see no regular contributor here, but Discospinster maybe?-- Wuerzele ( talk) 04:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Sony Animation is collaborating with SEGA to create a movie based on Sonic the Hedgehog. That hasn't been added to "films in development". (Don't believe me on this one? Here's a link to prove it: Sonic the Hedgehog Movie Coming in 2018, Mixes Live-Action and CGI|Gamespot ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJoebro64 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Alfredeboogerteen ( talk) 15:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
What exactly is scorch code? I searched it and it isnt thon google Jstar367 ( talk) 20:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
On* Jstar367 ( talk) 20:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Can anyone respond Jstar367 ( talk) 21:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hey yall peter rabbits release date needs to be changed itll be released in april 2018 and itll be voiced by james corden Jstar367 ( talk) 22:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Has Sony Pictures ever distributed a Sony Pictures Animation film before? No. Columbia Pictures has distributed the films. And how come Columbia doesn't get all the credit? It has distributed several films before Sony bought the rights! And Sony Pictures is the parent of all their divisions. So I say, give Columbia Pictures a division: Sony Pictures Animation. Or have Columbia Pictures be the parent of Sony Pictures Animation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XSMan2016 ( talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Can some help finished Draft:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise) page I need help with cast, crew and anything else anyone can think off. (P.S I use the HT franchise page as a template. 82.38.157.176 ( talk) 10:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't see a source saying that SPA is doing content for adults? All I know is, the source on there does not say it's doing adult-only content. If it's not true, can someone remove it? 98.235.131.222 ( talk) 14:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
An anonymous user bought the idea of making another table for the films SPA distributes (such as the live-action hybrids and the Aardman productions), to avoid reader confusion. While I'm heistant on the idea (especially to keep the article comfortable to navigate and read), I would want other editors opinion on this proposal. Gouleg ( talk) 04:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Sony Animation didn't have any involment with this film other than being distributed (by Sony Pictures Releasing) unlike the sequel which does label in its marketing as being released under the SPA label and this diff shows addition of a note which does not conform to the encyclopedic style. So it should be included in the feature films table with a different note or only the Releasing page should contain this movie? Gouleg ( talk) 21:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Sony Pictures Animation was the main company credited for making the emoji movie, but it isn't mentioned on the page for SPA, Sony Pictures, or Columbia, despite the fact that they are all mentioned on the page for the emoji movie -- Ploopy50012 ( talk) 07:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Should we expand the current "List of franchises" table on this article to also include TV series and shorts? Some of the films mentioned in this table have their own franchise articles (such as Open Season, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and Hotel Transylvania) where more related works are explained in detail, while other films have (or currently have) a single entry ( The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists! and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, excluding their short film each one has from their home media release). The main topic of this article as well is about Sony Pictures Animation, whose main activity is producing films, so I consider only those films produced by SPA to be in the list, while any other media coming from any of their films should rather be added to its franchise article.
On
List of highest-grossing films, a franchise is defined as [having] two works derived from a common intellectual property.
So if the other films mentioned in this list does not have a franchise article, an article about it can be established (as long it meets
WP:NOTABILITY criteria) and added to the list. -
Gouleg🛋️
harass/
hound
17:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Is no one gonna mention in the article that after The Angry Birds Movie 2, the following Sony Pictures Animation films had been released to streaming and there haven't been any theatrical releases due to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact? -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 16:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Sony Pictures Animation did not produced this feature-length animated film, Hercules and Hercules was never re-released in theatres in October 2008, because Hercules was produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation and released in theatres in June 1997. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 ( talk) 01:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect
Columbia TriStar Animation and it has been listed
for discussion. Readers of this page are welcome to participate at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Columbia TriStar Animation until a consensus is reached. From
Bassie f (
his talk page)
09:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
List of TV Series/TV Movie Buccaneer of Nemaris (2002 TV Series) The Princess of Music (2002 TV Movie) Sapphires and Sirens (2003 TV Series) Tanya Viola (2003 TV Movie) Lamplighter Series (2004 TV Series) Nagano Castle (Spin Off 2005 TV Series) TimeLine (TV Series) (2002–present) 148.252.132.52 ( talk) 05:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Why wasn't Monster House mentioned? I fixed it, but still...
According to Sony Pictures Animation's artist, Armand Serrano, Sony has cancelled The Familiars: http://armandserrano.blogspot.com/2012/08/bridgetower.html, http://armandserrano.blogspot.com/2012/09/bridgetower-2.html.
Are there still any objections against the removal of The Familiars from this article?-- Carniolus ( talk) 12:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
I added the following paragraph:
A computer animation wage theft cartel, which started in the mid-1990s was only uncovered in 2014, and is going to trial in 2015. It involved Pixar Animation Studios, Walt Disney Animation Studios, Lucasfilm, ImageMovers Digital and Blue Sky Animation. Human resources departments heads and their recruiters met secretly each year, agreed not to hire each others animation studio's staff, and deprived employees of higher wages.(Mark Ames (2 December 2014). "New court filing shows stunning new evidence of wage-fixing by major Hollywood animation studios". Pando Daily News. Retrieved 29 January 2015.)
Koala15 removed this, with the edit summary "hardly notable, companies like this get lawsuits all the time". When I asked him not to remove sourced info and discuss this issue on this talk page to reach consensus, rather than continuing to remove, he wrote again it was "not quite notable" and refused discussion. When I reinserted, he did just that -remove again, INSISTING in the edit summary "its sourced but not quite notable".
WP:Notability is a test used to decide whether a topic warrants its own article, which is not what I am proposing here. ANd notability guidelines do not apply to article content. Info does need to be WP:verifiable, and this is. Did Koala15 mix up the 2 issues?
Info is noteworthy (maybe Koala15 meant that?), in that the prosecution of this wage theft cartel will not be your everyday lawsuit, but is a big deal when you just look at its length of existence and the sheer size, the companies involved, the many tech people affected by it. It appears to me that this user may just not have read the source. Here is a shorter article from 9-9-14 Do others think thid paragraph isnt noteworthy?? I see no regular contributor here, but Discospinster maybe?-- Wuerzele ( talk) 04:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Sony Animation is collaborating with SEGA to create a movie based on Sonic the Hedgehog. That hasn't been added to "films in development". (Don't believe me on this one? Here's a link to prove it: Sonic the Hedgehog Movie Coming in 2018, Mixes Live-Action and CGI|Gamespot ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJoebro64 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Alfredeboogerteen ( talk) 15:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
What exactly is scorch code? I searched it and it isnt thon google Jstar367 ( talk) 20:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
On* Jstar367 ( talk) 20:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Can anyone respond Jstar367 ( talk) 21:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Hey yall peter rabbits release date needs to be changed itll be released in april 2018 and itll be voiced by james corden Jstar367 ( talk) 22:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Has Sony Pictures ever distributed a Sony Pictures Animation film before? No. Columbia Pictures has distributed the films. And how come Columbia doesn't get all the credit? It has distributed several films before Sony bought the rights! And Sony Pictures is the parent of all their divisions. So I say, give Columbia Pictures a division: Sony Pictures Animation. Or have Columbia Pictures be the parent of Sony Pictures Animation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XSMan2016 ( talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Can some help finished Draft:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (Franchise) page I need help with cast, crew and anything else anyone can think off. (P.S I use the HT franchise page as a template. 82.38.157.176 ( talk) 10:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't see a source saying that SPA is doing content for adults? All I know is, the source on there does not say it's doing adult-only content. If it's not true, can someone remove it? 98.235.131.222 ( talk) 14:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
An anonymous user bought the idea of making another table for the films SPA distributes (such as the live-action hybrids and the Aardman productions), to avoid reader confusion. While I'm heistant on the idea (especially to keep the article comfortable to navigate and read), I would want other editors opinion on this proposal. Gouleg ( talk) 04:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Sony Animation didn't have any involment with this film other than being distributed (by Sony Pictures Releasing) unlike the sequel which does label in its marketing as being released under the SPA label and this diff shows addition of a note which does not conform to the encyclopedic style. So it should be included in the feature films table with a different note or only the Releasing page should contain this movie? Gouleg ( talk) 21:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Sony Pictures Animation was the main company credited for making the emoji movie, but it isn't mentioned on the page for SPA, Sony Pictures, or Columbia, despite the fact that they are all mentioned on the page for the emoji movie -- Ploopy50012 ( talk) 07:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Should we expand the current "List of franchises" table on this article to also include TV series and shorts? Some of the films mentioned in this table have their own franchise articles (such as Open Season, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs and Hotel Transylvania) where more related works are explained in detail, while other films have (or currently have) a single entry ( The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists! and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, excluding their short film each one has from their home media release). The main topic of this article as well is about Sony Pictures Animation, whose main activity is producing films, so I consider only those films produced by SPA to be in the list, while any other media coming from any of their films should rather be added to its franchise article.
On
List of highest-grossing films, a franchise is defined as [having] two works derived from a common intellectual property.
So if the other films mentioned in this list does not have a franchise article, an article about it can be established (as long it meets
WP:NOTABILITY criteria) and added to the list. -
Gouleg🛋️
harass/
hound
17:03, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Is no one gonna mention in the article that after The Angry Birds Movie 2, the following Sony Pictures Animation films had been released to streaming and there haven't been any theatrical releases due to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact? -- XSMan2016 ( talk) 16:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Sony Pictures Animation did not produced this feature-length animated film, Hercules and Hercules was never re-released in theatres in October 2008, because Hercules was produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation and released in theatres in June 1997. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 ( talk) 01:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect
Columbia TriStar Animation and it has been listed
for discussion. Readers of this page are welcome to participate at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Columbia TriStar Animation until a consensus is reached. From
Bassie f (
his talk page)
09:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
List of TV Series/TV Movie Buccaneer of Nemaris (2002 TV Series) The Princess of Music (2002 TV Movie) Sapphires and Sirens (2003 TV Series) Tanya Viola (2003 TV Movie) Lamplighter Series (2004 TV Series) Nagano Castle (Spin Off 2005 TV Series) TimeLine (TV Series) (2002–present) 148.252.132.52 ( talk) 05:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)