![]() | Sea surface temperature has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I would like to nominate this article to be elevated to class B. I am in a position to claim good accuracy in the sections relating to the satellite measurements of SST. There is still a lot to be done regarding the style of writing and relevancy. Objections? Javit 15:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
It is apparently of some debate whether sea surface temperature should be capitalized (Sea Surface Temperature). See here. Since it is not capitalized, I changed all link texts to here to also be uncapitalized. — jdorje ( talk) 22:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
A large part of this text appears to have been cut and paste from [ here]
Compare the wiki article from "The earliest technique..." and the article linked to above. VsevolodKrolikov ( talk) 16:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
The satellite stuff is all a bit NOAA/NASA-centric, isn't it? Why mention of MODIS (2000), but none of (A)ATSR? This series has been running since 1991 and is the reference dataset standard within GHRSST. The discussion of how the SST is estimated should at least mention the split-window method, and link to a suitable reference. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.171.166.233 (
talk) 14:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
As this article is now being used as a subarticle to the improved numerical weather prediction article, it was time to bring it into wikipedia compliance on a number of issues, which got it upgraded to C class. Created a lead for the article, added referencing, added appropriate images, added wikilinks, and reduced what appeared to be a large NOAA/NASA advertisement in the satellite section of the article (which was against MoS anyway). The only major upgrade left is the referencing of the satellite section. Let me know what you all think of the changes. Thegreatdr ( talk) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
There should be a separate article on OHC instead of a redirect to this article IMO. ~ A H 1( T C U) 01:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I am currently in the process of reviewing this article. I have made some minor improvements to style, spelling and other details as a part of the review.
Reviewer: ~ A H 1( T C U) 02:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Reasonably well-written, good citations and overall prose, adequate introduction to topic.
Hold Very well written and provides a well balanced view without deviating into a NPOV debate on Global Warming. One concern and the reason for a hold are the two images with the diurnal SST curves. The images are possibly OR provided by a research scientist. The measurement header and lead do not site sources to help support the images. With a little sourcing the images could be used without further issues in my opinion Inomyabcs ( talk) 03:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Some good links for the article include more links to oscillations that involve SST-atmosphere temperature changes, more information on the effects of SST/salinity on sea ice freezing/melting and coral bleaching. ~ A H 1( T C U) 03:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
How on earth can an article on sea surface temperature achieve GA status without a discussion of ENSO??!!?? This only reinforces that the GA tag is meaningless as an indicator of content. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 19:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd be much happier to contribute to meteorology articles in general if there wasn't such an emphasis on reaching GA/FA. The way I've put it before is that I'd rather write good articles than Good Articles. Just do the best job we can and screw all this GA/FA business. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 02:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Is this available anywhere? (for open water) What and where? • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sea surface temperature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sea surface temperature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Some of the sources show warnings for being preprints or general repositories. Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) is not mentioned. So I wonder if the article is out of date? Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
RE: "Some of the sources show warnings for being preprints or general repositories." This is simply a reminder to make sure you're not citing crap. Here it highlights stuff with links to Google books. Google Books will have things from reputable publishers like Springer Science+Business Media, but also things like Alphascript and Lulu.com. If the books have reputable publishers (which they all seem to have), there's no real problem. See the 'General repository' and 'Google Books' examples in User:Headbomb/unreliable#Common cleanup and non-problematic cases for more information. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 16:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I am going to leave this community reassessment open in the hope that other people will comment. Also I see from the instructions that "Any uninvolved editor may close the discussion". Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
My opinion is delist as out of date. Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
I think we should have a section that is visible from the table of contents that explains succinctly the impact that climate change has on sea surface temperature (i.e. warming). We might not need a lot of new text but ensure people can find the relevant information (perhaps by using an excerpt from ocean heat content or effects of climate change on oceans). EMsmile ( talk) 21:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Because ocean temperature redirects here, treat it as a legitimate page topic with the added paragraph:
Ocean temperature is related to ocean heat content, an important topic in the debate over global warming.
But you really have to question whether this redirect has lost its marbles, in the first place. — MaxEnt 21:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Deeper ocean temperatures (more than 20 metres below the surface) also vary by region and time, and they contribute to variations in ocean heat content and ocean stratification. The increase of both, ocean surface temperature and deeper ocean temperature, is an important effect of climate change on oceans.. What's a good reference that we can cite for this kind of content? A textbook or something that is not behind a paywall? EMsmile ( talk) 10:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
(We've had a related discussion about this just before (May 2022) but I felt it's better to start this new thread.) I've just changed the redirect that was redirecting ocean temperature to here. I felt it didn't work so well to cover both of those terms in the same article. I've changed the redirect to a sub-section within effects of climate change on oceans now, which includes the latest data on ocean temperature changes. I can imagine that at a later stage, the article ocean temperature might also become a stand alone article. In the context of climate change, it is becoming more and more important. Because of the changed redirect, I've also changed the hatnote and I've changed the definitions sections a bit. EMsmile ( talk) 22:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
At depths of around 500 m, depletion of oxygen is becoming more common to due rising ocean temperatures.Where do I wikilink "ocean temperature" to? I am not meant to wikilink to a disambiguation page. So I'd probably wikilink to Effects of climate change on oceans#Ocean temperature which is not even in your "main" list but which currently contains the most up to date info about temperature profiles at depth. EMsmile ( talk) 09:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I've just changed the image in the lead from a "climate change one" to a "natural science / georgraphy" one. The latter now shows how sea surface temperature is different for different parts of the oceans. The former (seen here on the right) contained too much other information in my opinion, e.g. it included the land surface temperature and also this statement above the graph: "oceans absorb over 90% of excess heat". This is too much jargon (absorb? excess heat? from when to when?) and thus digresses from the core purpose of the lead image: to show people with a visual image that they have come to the right page, the one that they were looking for. EMsmile ( talk) 13:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC) EMsmile ( talk) 13:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Uwappa ( talk) 16:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
References
![]() | Sea surface temperature has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I would like to nominate this article to be elevated to class B. I am in a position to claim good accuracy in the sections relating to the satellite measurements of SST. There is still a lot to be done regarding the style of writing and relevancy. Objections? Javit 15:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
It is apparently of some debate whether sea surface temperature should be capitalized (Sea Surface Temperature). See here. Since it is not capitalized, I changed all link texts to here to also be uncapitalized. — jdorje ( talk) 22:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
A large part of this text appears to have been cut and paste from [ here]
Compare the wiki article from "The earliest technique..." and the article linked to above. VsevolodKrolikov ( talk) 16:31, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
The satellite stuff is all a bit NOAA/NASA-centric, isn't it? Why mention of MODIS (2000), but none of (A)ATSR? This series has been running since 1991 and is the reference dataset standard within GHRSST. The discussion of how the SST is estimated should at least mention the split-window method, and link to a suitable reference. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.171.166.233 (
talk) 14:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
As this article is now being used as a subarticle to the improved numerical weather prediction article, it was time to bring it into wikipedia compliance on a number of issues, which got it upgraded to C class. Created a lead for the article, added referencing, added appropriate images, added wikilinks, and reduced what appeared to be a large NOAA/NASA advertisement in the satellite section of the article (which was against MoS anyway). The only major upgrade left is the referencing of the satellite section. Let me know what you all think of the changes. Thegreatdr ( talk) 17:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
There should be a separate article on OHC instead of a redirect to this article IMO. ~ A H 1( T C U) 01:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
I am currently in the process of reviewing this article. I have made some minor improvements to style, spelling and other details as a part of the review.
Reviewer: ~ A H 1( T C U) 02:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Reasonably well-written, good citations and overall prose, adequate introduction to topic.
Hold Very well written and provides a well balanced view without deviating into a NPOV debate on Global Warming. One concern and the reason for a hold are the two images with the diurnal SST curves. The images are possibly OR provided by a research scientist. The measurement header and lead do not site sources to help support the images. With a little sourcing the images could be used without further issues in my opinion Inomyabcs ( talk) 03:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Some good links for the article include more links to oscillations that involve SST-atmosphere temperature changes, more information on the effects of SST/salinity on sea ice freezing/melting and coral bleaching. ~ A H 1( T C U) 03:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
How on earth can an article on sea surface temperature achieve GA status without a discussion of ENSO??!!?? This only reinforces that the GA tag is meaningless as an indicator of content. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 19:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd be much happier to contribute to meteorology articles in general if there wasn't such an emphasis on reaching GA/FA. The way I've put it before is that I'd rather write good articles than Good Articles. Just do the best job we can and screw all this GA/FA business. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 02:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Is this available anywhere? (for open water) What and where? • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sea surface temperature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sea surface temperature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Some of the sources show warnings for being preprints or general repositories. Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) is not mentioned. So I wonder if the article is out of date? Chidgk1 ( talk) 15:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
RE: "Some of the sources show warnings for being preprints or general repositories." This is simply a reminder to make sure you're not citing crap. Here it highlights stuff with links to Google books. Google Books will have things from reputable publishers like Springer Science+Business Media, but also things like Alphascript and Lulu.com. If the books have reputable publishers (which they all seem to have), there's no real problem. See the 'General repository' and 'Google Books' examples in User:Headbomb/unreliable#Common cleanup and non-problematic cases for more information. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 16:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I am going to leave this community reassessment open in the hope that other people will comment. Also I see from the instructions that "Any uninvolved editor may close the discussion". Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
My opinion is delist as out of date. Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
I think we should have a section that is visible from the table of contents that explains succinctly the impact that climate change has on sea surface temperature (i.e. warming). We might not need a lot of new text but ensure people can find the relevant information (perhaps by using an excerpt from ocean heat content or effects of climate change on oceans). EMsmile ( talk) 21:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Because ocean temperature redirects here, treat it as a legitimate page topic with the added paragraph:
Ocean temperature is related to ocean heat content, an important topic in the debate over global warming.
But you really have to question whether this redirect has lost its marbles, in the first place. — MaxEnt 21:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Deeper ocean temperatures (more than 20 metres below the surface) also vary by region and time, and they contribute to variations in ocean heat content and ocean stratification. The increase of both, ocean surface temperature and deeper ocean temperature, is an important effect of climate change on oceans.. What's a good reference that we can cite for this kind of content? A textbook or something that is not behind a paywall? EMsmile ( talk) 10:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
(We've had a related discussion about this just before (May 2022) but I felt it's better to start this new thread.) I've just changed the redirect that was redirecting ocean temperature to here. I felt it didn't work so well to cover both of those terms in the same article. I've changed the redirect to a sub-section within effects of climate change on oceans now, which includes the latest data on ocean temperature changes. I can imagine that at a later stage, the article ocean temperature might also become a stand alone article. In the context of climate change, it is becoming more and more important. Because of the changed redirect, I've also changed the hatnote and I've changed the definitions sections a bit. EMsmile ( talk) 22:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
At depths of around 500 m, depletion of oxygen is becoming more common to due rising ocean temperatures.Where do I wikilink "ocean temperature" to? I am not meant to wikilink to a disambiguation page. So I'd probably wikilink to Effects of climate change on oceans#Ocean temperature which is not even in your "main" list but which currently contains the most up to date info about temperature profiles at depth. EMsmile ( talk) 09:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I've just changed the image in the lead from a "climate change one" to a "natural science / georgraphy" one. The latter now shows how sea surface temperature is different for different parts of the oceans. The former (seen here on the right) contained too much other information in my opinion, e.g. it included the land surface temperature and also this statement above the graph: "oceans absorb over 90% of excess heat". This is too much jargon (absorb? excess heat? from when to when?) and thus digresses from the core purpose of the lead image: to show people with a visual image that they have come to the right page, the one that they were looking for. EMsmile ( talk) 13:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC) EMsmile ( talk) 13:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Uwappa ( talk) 16:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
References