This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this "Sakurai Kai," or should it be "Sakura Kai"? -- Nobunaga24 07:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe you have it reversed.
It was the Kodo-ha or 'Imperial Way', not the Tosei-ha or 'Control Group', who were responsible for the coup attempts and whose
"avowed aim was threat of a one-party state under army control and run on a war economcy for the army's benefit."
The Tosei-ha were the faction who
"had no particular quarrel with capitalism provided the manufacturers did as the Army told them."
"The Japanese War Machine" Chartwell Books, 1976 Befuddler 05:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this "Sakurai Kai," or should it be "Sakura Kai"? -- Nobunaga24 07:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe you have it reversed.
It was the Kodo-ha or 'Imperial Way', not the Tosei-ha or 'Control Group', who were responsible for the coup attempts and whose
"avowed aim was threat of a one-party state under army control and run on a war economcy for the army's benefit."
The Tosei-ha were the faction who
"had no particular quarrel with capitalism provided the manufacturers did as the Army told them."
"The Japanese War Machine" Chartwell Books, 1976 Befuddler 05:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)