| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Vfrickey ( talk · contribs) 17:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
It's hard to square the statements in the lede sentence and the ones following it with our
WP:NPOV ethic. it states things as fact which are now (since the Mueller Report) controversial and present one major political party's viewpoints in wikivoice. The consensus model really failed wikipedia here, and provides fodder for those who claim wikipedia is too ideologically biased to be a reliable source of information. Not only is this not a Good Article, it's an embarrassment to the wikipedia project.
loupgarous (
talk)
17:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- A GA eval should recognize consensus and the reality of what the overwhelming number of WP:RSes report as facts. Casprings ( talk) 12:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- reply As a semi regular contributor/reader for this article, I don't qualify as uninvolved, but I feel the consensus model was never the issue, rather, it was the distracting rhetoric by WP:FRINGE editors with various political POV... DN ( talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Vfrickey ( talk · contribs) 17:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
It's hard to square the statements in the lede sentence and the ones following it with our
WP:NPOV ethic. it states things as fact which are now (since the Mueller Report) controversial and present one major political party's viewpoints in wikivoice. The consensus model really failed wikipedia here, and provides fodder for those who claim wikipedia is too ideologically biased to be a reliable source of information. Not only is this not a Good Article, it's an embarrassment to the wikipedia project.
loupgarous (
talk)
17:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- A GA eval should recognize consensus and the reality of what the overwhelming number of WP:RSes report as facts. Casprings ( talk) 12:41, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- reply As a semi regular contributor/reader for this article, I don't qualify as uninvolved, but I feel the consensus model was never the issue, rather, it was the distracting rhetoric by WP:FRINGE editors with various political POV... DN ( talk) 07:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)