| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackwater fever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brunner ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
@ Vfickey: Might you have time and interest to review " v:Forecasting nuclear proliferation" (on Wikiversity)?
I'm scheduled to make a presentation at the 88th Military Operations Research Society Symposium, June 15-19; my talk is scheduled for June 18. I'm asking you, because in Talk:Abdul Qadeer Khan, you said you had "researched nuclear proliferation issues" yourself, which suggests you might be able to identify and help me correct deficiencies in that article. Of course, I hope you would also find it interesting and useful for your own work.
If you'd like, I can send you a link to the slides for my presentation, and I'll be happy to give you the talk via videoconferencing at some mutually convenient time. I'm UTC-5. Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. DavidMCEddy ( talk) 20:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ DavidMCEddy:With the caveats that I have no formal qualifications as a student of nuclear proliferation and my research has solely been conducted as an amateur, yes, I don't mind reviewing your presentation. Video conferencing is problematic over my satellite Internet connection, but I"d be happy to review your slide deck. FWIW, I'm UTC-6 (US Central Daylight Savings time).
- Thanks for your praise - I work when I can, and when I can replace heat with light in the sometimes contentious fields of Wikipedia. -- loupgarous ( talk) 02:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- My draft slides are available at Google Slides "Predicting the Time to Next Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons". (I'm Graves, the lead author on those slides.)
- I'm confused regarding time zones: I'm also in US Central Daylight Savings Time. However, as I'm writing this, "The World Clock" says it's approximately 10 PM in Kansas City and Chicago, and UTC is approximately 3 AM tomorrow. That sounds to me like Kansas City and Chicago are UTC-5, not UTC-6. ???
- Thanks, DavidMCEddy ( talk) 03:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. I got the data on my time zone from Microsoft's automated Internet Time service: "(UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)". However, when I lived in central Indiana, I had a similar issue - until recently that part of Indiana did not observe Daylight Savings Time, so half the year we had the same local time as the US Eastern Time Zine. -- loupgarous ( talk) 03:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've commented on your slide presentation (both factual issues in recounting patterns in past nuclear proliferation and other historical and current issues that perhaps were more than you asked for). -- loupgarous ( talk) 12:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 08:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackwater fever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brunner ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
@ Vfickey: Might you have time and interest to review " v:Forecasting nuclear proliferation" (on Wikiversity)?
I'm scheduled to make a presentation at the 88th Military Operations Research Society Symposium, June 15-19; my talk is scheduled for June 18. I'm asking you, because in Talk:Abdul Qadeer Khan, you said you had "researched nuclear proliferation issues" yourself, which suggests you might be able to identify and help me correct deficiencies in that article. Of course, I hope you would also find it interesting and useful for your own work.
If you'd like, I can send you a link to the slides for my presentation, and I'll be happy to give you the talk via videoconferencing at some mutually convenient time. I'm UTC-5. Thanks for your many contributions to Wikipedia. DavidMCEddy ( talk) 20:17, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ DavidMCEddy:With the caveats that I have no formal qualifications as a student of nuclear proliferation and my research has solely been conducted as an amateur, yes, I don't mind reviewing your presentation. Video conferencing is problematic over my satellite Internet connection, but I"d be happy to review your slide deck. FWIW, I'm UTC-6 (US Central Daylight Savings time).
- Thanks for your praise - I work when I can, and when I can replace heat with light in the sometimes contentious fields of Wikipedia. -- loupgarous ( talk) 02:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- My draft slides are available at Google Slides "Predicting the Time to Next Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons". (I'm Graves, the lead author on those slides.)
- I'm confused regarding time zones: I'm also in US Central Daylight Savings Time. However, as I'm writing this, "The World Clock" says it's approximately 10 PM in Kansas City and Chicago, and UTC is approximately 3 AM tomorrow. That sounds to me like Kansas City and Chicago are UTC-5, not UTC-6. ???
- Thanks, DavidMCEddy ( talk) 03:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. I got the data on my time zone from Microsoft's automated Internet Time service: "(UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)". However, when I lived in central Indiana, I had a similar issue - until recently that part of Indiana did not observe Daylight Savings Time, so half the year we had the same local time as the US Eastern Time Zine. -- loupgarous ( talk) 03:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've commented on your slide presentation (both factual issues in recounting patterns in past nuclear proliferation and other historical and current issues that perhaps were more than you asked for). -- loupgarous ( talk) 12:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |