This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please update the Production section. 45.72.207.240 ( talk) 18:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe there have been any updates on this title since January 2023. And I don't know if production is moving forward at all. 2607:FEA8:761B:C900:E15A:7A4:C4F8:657E ( talk) 01:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
the film is being rated in several countries, and apparently this movie is 143 minutes long?? that can’t be right. anybody down to try and verify the authenticity? Flyless Kyle ( talk) 16:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "Ruby and Sam's supportive father and Flo's husband" to "Ruby and Sam's supportive father and Agatha's husband" because of Ruby's mother's name mentioned in this source: [1] 99.209.40.250 ( talk) 17:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
References
Can someone find sources about how much money the film earned in the United States and Canada and internationally in total? 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:410B:F981:6FCE:C16B ( talk) 00:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
There exists actual evidence that this film may indeed have a future and I remember that there was a subsection that was, in my opinion, wrongfully removed as a result of the aforementioned articles and quotes from the people who worked with or on this film. Could someone please re add the section? 2A00:23C6:3D09:D801:6811:D331:FCE7:C4D7 ( talk) 01:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Can someone block the editor who keeps changing Will Forte’s name to something in Russian? They’ve done it several times and at this point, it’s very clearly either vandalism or trolling. We have told them to stop and it’s starting to get on mine and a few other editors’ nerves. At least blocking the guy would be much appreciated. HiveEmperor ( talk) 21:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Blue Chapman has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Blue Chapman until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
17:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Can somebody please ban the IP that keeps messing with the Cast section? It’s becoming increasingly aggravating and can be considered vandalism. HiveEmperor ( talk) 19:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
This film lost $80 million for Universal, but the lead is written as the film "underperformed". To me, that has a more positive connotation than the actual losses the film made. Furthermore, the Box Office section uses the term 'bomb'. I changed the lead to 'bomb' but this was swiftly reverted. Is there a precedent for the use of underperfomed? And what constitutes this? TimmyC105 ( talk) 02:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Can anyone find something to expand on the Future section? It needs a little more info. HiveEmperor ( talk) 17:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Could someone restore it, I just wanted to delete something that was false and I accidentally destroyed the article. Can someone fix it, thanks Izan De Assís ( talk) 20:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Is there anyone who can confirm that this is real. Because I haven't found anything about it Izan De Assís ( talk) 20:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Can someone explain how the production section became unorganized? ZX2006XZ ( talk) 13:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Since the marketing of Ruby Gillman was awful, I figure that the marketing could have a separate section of its own. Feel free to comment. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 22:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need the art book to be a ref source for the production section? It’s not a better source to look through than to give out the people’s names if we know who was credited in the film. 64.56.14.75 ( talk) 05:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I know that section is too long, but i think solving it by turning it into a seperate article might be a better idea. Exteahans71 ( talk) 21:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I've removed the entire section as none of it is supported by the supplied references. The first ref is a tweet by some random person unconnected to the production. The second ref makes no mention of any of the names listed. The third ref is to a book on the art of the film. It's unlikely that two pages of the book supports the information supplied - if this is reinserted I think we need an exact quotation. Barry Wom ( talk) 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
can someone please re-add the future section? kirk demicco ( the director of the film ) said in an interview that he would like to make a sequel. yet, the future section got taken down, can someone please re-add it? I've tried to re-add the future section myself and yet, it keeps getting taken down saying that it was "unsourced" to despite me clearly adding a source, It would really appreciated if someone re-added the future section, here's a link to the interview: https://www.cinemablend.com/interviews/teenage-kraken-director-honest-more-mermaids-movie-one-thread-explore-sequel 2A02:C7C:DC07:C900:6477:C7C4:FD3:85B1 ( talk) 18:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
StephanTheAnimator, when you were rewording this page, why did you bother put the word "also" thinking that there is correlation between mixed reception and box-office faliure? Just why i just need to know. 2601:196:4A01:D770:5DC8:FF1C:47B3:3774 ( talk) 22:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please update the Production section. 45.72.207.240 ( talk) 18:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe there have been any updates on this title since January 2023. And I don't know if production is moving forward at all. 2607:FEA8:761B:C900:E15A:7A4:C4F8:657E ( talk) 01:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
the film is being rated in several countries, and apparently this movie is 143 minutes long?? that can’t be right. anybody down to try and verify the authenticity? Flyless Kyle ( talk) 16:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change "Ruby and Sam's supportive father and Flo's husband" to "Ruby and Sam's supportive father and Agatha's husband" because of Ruby's mother's name mentioned in this source: [1] 99.209.40.250 ( talk) 17:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
References
Can someone find sources about how much money the film earned in the United States and Canada and internationally in total? 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:410B:F981:6FCE:C16B ( talk) 00:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
There exists actual evidence that this film may indeed have a future and I remember that there was a subsection that was, in my opinion, wrongfully removed as a result of the aforementioned articles and quotes from the people who worked with or on this film. Could someone please re add the section? 2A00:23C6:3D09:D801:6811:D331:FCE7:C4D7 ( talk) 01:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Can someone block the editor who keeps changing Will Forte’s name to something in Russian? They’ve done it several times and at this point, it’s very clearly either vandalism or trolling. We have told them to stop and it’s starting to get on mine and a few other editors’ nerves. At least blocking the guy would be much appreciated. HiveEmperor ( talk) 21:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Blue Chapman has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Blue Chapman until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
17:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Can somebody please ban the IP that keeps messing with the Cast section? It’s becoming increasingly aggravating and can be considered vandalism. HiveEmperor ( talk) 19:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
This film lost $80 million for Universal, but the lead is written as the film "underperformed". To me, that has a more positive connotation than the actual losses the film made. Furthermore, the Box Office section uses the term 'bomb'. I changed the lead to 'bomb' but this was swiftly reverted. Is there a precedent for the use of underperfomed? And what constitutes this? TimmyC105 ( talk) 02:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Can anyone find something to expand on the Future section? It needs a little more info. HiveEmperor ( talk) 17:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Could someone restore it, I just wanted to delete something that was false and I accidentally destroyed the article. Can someone fix it, thanks Izan De Assís ( talk) 20:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Is there anyone who can confirm that this is real. Because I haven't found anything about it Izan De Assís ( talk) 20:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Can someone explain how the production section became unorganized? ZX2006XZ ( talk) 13:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Since the marketing of Ruby Gillman was awful, I figure that the marketing could have a separate section of its own. Feel free to comment. ZX2006XZ ( talk) 22:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need the art book to be a ref source for the production section? It’s not a better source to look through than to give out the people’s names if we know who was credited in the film. 64.56.14.75 ( talk) 05:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I know that section is too long, but i think solving it by turning it into a seperate article might be a better idea. Exteahans71 ( talk) 21:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I've removed the entire section as none of it is supported by the supplied references. The first ref is a tweet by some random person unconnected to the production. The second ref makes no mention of any of the names listed. The third ref is to a book on the art of the film. It's unlikely that two pages of the book supports the information supplied - if this is reinserted I think we need an exact quotation. Barry Wom ( talk) 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
can someone please re-add the future section? kirk demicco ( the director of the film ) said in an interview that he would like to make a sequel. yet, the future section got taken down, can someone please re-add it? I've tried to re-add the future section myself and yet, it keeps getting taken down saying that it was "unsourced" to despite me clearly adding a source, It would really appreciated if someone re-added the future section, here's a link to the interview: https://www.cinemablend.com/interviews/teenage-kraken-director-honest-more-mermaids-movie-one-thread-explore-sequel 2A02:C7C:DC07:C900:6477:C7C4:FD3:85B1 ( talk) 18:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
StephanTheAnimator, when you were rewording this page, why did you bother put the word "also" thinking that there is correlation between mixed reception and box-office faliure? Just why i just need to know. 2601:196:4A01:D770:5DC8:FF1C:47B3:3774 ( talk) 22:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)