This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rosalie Edge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Rosalie Edge has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 6, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Rosalie Edge appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 October 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just added a 1917 photo of Rosalie Edge, not even realizing who she was. So glad to read this article and know she founded Hawk Mountain! I went there often with my grandmother and her Audubon Society friends as a kid in the 1970s. Happy memories, thank you to all who made this article.- Penny Richards ( talk) 03:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi folks. Not a ton of visible life in this article or talk page. In case there are any watchlisters: I'm hoping to nominate this article for Good Article status sometime in the next month. This is part of WikiProject Women in Green's July GA drive. Any help would be appreciated. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 05:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 23:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 23:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Image is appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.
-- Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 00:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 23:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Firefangledfeathers ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Meets eligibility criteria - length, and newness i.e. recently promoted to GA. Article is well sourced. I will WP:AGF on some of the offline sources. QPQ done. Hook is cited and is interesting. Earwig does not find any issues. Marking this hook approved. I would encourage the nominator to consider adding the picture (which seems to be in WP:PD to the nomination as well. As a member of WP:WiR I think this is something we should push for. With or without the picture, this one is good to go. Ktin ( talk) 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
contribs) 03:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Firefangledfeathers, I realized after I promoted this to GA that I should have done some spotchecks. I've now done some and found one issue I wanted to check with you:
That was the only issue that came up of the ones I looked at. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 14:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rosalie Edge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Rosalie Edge has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 6, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Rosalie Edge appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 October 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just added a 1917 photo of Rosalie Edge, not even realizing who she was. So glad to read this article and know she founded Hawk Mountain! I went there often with my grandmother and her Audubon Society friends as a kid in the 1970s. Happy memories, thank you to all who made this article.- Penny Richards ( talk) 03:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi folks. Not a ton of visible life in this article or talk page. In case there are any watchlisters: I'm hoping to nominate this article for Good Article status sometime in the next month. This is part of WikiProject Women in Green's July GA drive. Any help would be appreciated. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 05:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mike Christie ( talk · contribs) 23:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library) 23:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Image is appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.
-- Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 00:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 23:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Firefangledfeathers ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Meets eligibility criteria - length, and newness i.e. recently promoted to GA. Article is well sourced. I will WP:AGF on some of the offline sources. QPQ done. Hook is cited and is interesting. Earwig does not find any issues. Marking this hook approved. I would encourage the nominator to consider adding the picture (which seems to be in WP:PD to the nomination as well. As a member of WP:WiR I think this is something we should push for. With or without the picture, this one is good to go. Ktin ( talk) 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
contribs) 03:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Firefangledfeathers, I realized after I promoted this to GA that I should have done some spotchecks. I've now done some and found one issue I wanted to check with you:
That was the only issue that came up of the ones I looked at. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 14:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)